Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 661–671 | Cite as

A Pilot Study of an Adaptive, Idiographic, and Multi-Component Attention Bias Modification Program for Social Anxiety Disorder

  • Nader Amir
  • Jennie M. Kuckertz
  • Marlene V. Strege
Original Article

Abstract

An attentional bias toward threat may be one mechanism underlying clinical anxiety. Attention bias modification (ABM) aims to reduce symptoms of anxiety disorders by directly modifying this deficit. However, existing ABM training programs have not consistently modified attentional bias and may not reflect optimal learning needs of participants (i.e., lack of explicit instruction, training goal unclear to participants, lack of feedback, non-adaptive, inability to differentiate or target different components of attentional bias). In the current study, we introduce a new adaptive ABM program (AABM) and test its feasibility in individuals with social anxiety disorder. We report task characteristics and preliminary evidence that this task consistently modifies attentional bias and that changes in attentional bias (but not number of trials) correlate with the level of symptom reduction. These results suggest that AABM may be a targeted method for the next generation of studies examining the utility of attention training.

Keywords

Social anxiety Cognitive bias modification Attentional bias Attention bias modification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Cathy Chen and Kerry Kinney for their help with data collection. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 MH087623 awarded to the first author.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Nader Amir is part owner of a company that markets anxiety relief products. Jennie M. Kuckertz and Marlene V. Strege declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional). Informed consent was obtained from all individual subjects participating in the study.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Supplementary material

10608_2016_9781_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 28 kb)

References

  1. Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., & Przeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(11), 1325–1335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baert, S., De Raedt, R., Schacht, R., & Koster, E. H. (2010). Attentional bias training in depression: Therapeutic effects depend on depression severity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41(3), 265–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, S. L., Heinrichs, N., Kim, H. J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2002). The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: A preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 701–715.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Haim, Y., Morag, I., & Glickman, S. (2011). Training anxious children to disengage attention from threat: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(8), 861–869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy, 43(4), 724–740.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutelle, K. N., Kuckertz, J. M., Carlson, J., & Amir, N. (2014). A pilot study evaluating a one-session attention modification training to decrease overeating in obese children. Appetite, 76, 180–185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Burgers, C., Edena, A., van Engelenburga, M., & Buninghb, S. (2015). How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavanagh, J. F., & Shackman, A. J. (2015). Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 109(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, P. J. F., Notebaert, L., & MacLeod, C. (2014). Absence of evidence or evidence of absence: Reflecting on therapeutic implementations of attentional bias modification. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cristea, I. A., Kok, R. N., & Cuijpers, P. (2015a). Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 206, 7–16. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.146761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cristea, I. A., Mogoaşe, C., David, D., & Cuijpers, P. (2015b). Practitioner review: Cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 723–734. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dandeneau, S. D., & Baldwin, M. W. (2004). The inhibition of socially rejecting information among people with high versus low self-esteem: The role of attentional bias and the effects of bias reduction training. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(4), 584–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dandeneau, S. D., Baldwin, M. W., Baccus, J. R., Sakellaropoulo, M., & Pruessner, J. C. (2007). Cutting stress off at the pass: Reducing vigilance and responsiveness to social threat by manipulating attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Emmelkamp, P. M. (2012). Attention bias modification: The Emperor’s new suit? BMC Medicine, 10(1), 63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSMIV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). New York, NY: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Fresco, D. M., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., Liebowitz, M. R., Hami, S., Stein, M. B., & Goetz, D. (2001). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: A comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31(06), 1025–1035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., et al. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68(11), 982–990.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallett, P. E. (1978). Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Research, 18(10), 1279–1296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137(6), 940–958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Heeren, A., Mogoaşe, C., McNally, R. J., Schmitz, A., & Philippot, P. (2015). Does attention bias modification improve attentional control? A double-blind randomized experiment with individuals with social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 29, 35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heimberg, R. G., Horner, K. J., Juster, H. R., Safren, S. A., Brown, E. J., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale. Psychological Medicine, 29(01), 199–212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutton, S. B., & Ettinger, U. (2006). The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: A critical review. Psychophysiology, 43, 302–313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Iacoviello, B. M., Wu, G., Abend, R., Murrough, J. W., Feder, A., Fruchter, E., et al. (2014). Attention bias variability and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 27(2), 232–239.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2006). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(12), 1757–1771.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koster, E. H. W., De Raedt, R., Goeleven, E., Franck, E., & Crombez, G. (2005). Mood-congruent attentional bias in dysphoria: Maintained attention to and impaired disengagement from negative information. Emotion, 5(4), 446–455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Krebs, G., Hirsch, C. R., & Mathews, A. (2010). The effect of attention modification with explicit vs. minimal instructions on worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(3), 251–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuckertz, J. M., & Amir, N. (2015). Attention bias modification for anxiety and phobias: Current status and future directions. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17(2), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuckertz, J. M., Gildebrant, E., Liliequist, B., Karlström, P., Väppling, C., Bodlund, O., et al. (2014). Moderation and mediation of the effect of attention training in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 53, 30–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Linetzky, M., Pergamin-Hight, L., Pine, D. S., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2015). Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification treatment for anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 32(6), 383–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Locke, E. A. (1996). Motivation through conscious goal setting. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5(2), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacLeod, C., & Clarke, P. J. (2015). The attentional bias modification approach to anxiety intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(1), 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(1), 107–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. McGeary, J. E., Meadows, S. P., Amir, N., & Gibb, B. E. (2014). Computer-delivered, home-based, attentional retraining reduces drinking behavior in heavy drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(2), 559.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Mennin, D. S., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Schneier, F. R., Davies, S. O., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2002). Screening for social anxiety disorder in the clinical setting: Using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 661–673. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00134-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mogoaşe, C., David, D., & Koster, E. H. W. (2014). Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24652823
  40. Moser, J. S., Moran, T. P., Schroder, H. S., Donnellan, M. B., & Yeung, N. (2013). On the relationship between anxiety and error monitoring: A meta-analysis and conceptual framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 466. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelson, B. D., Jackson, F., Amir, N., & Hajcak, G. (2015). Single-session attention bias modification and error-related brain activity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(4), 776–786. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0365-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nishiguchi, Y., Takano, K., & Tanno, Y. (2015). Explicitly guided attentional bias modification promotes attentional disengagement from negative stimuli. Emotion. doi: 10.1037/a0039117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Driscoll, G. A., Alpert, N. M., Matthysse, S. W., Levy, D. L., Rauch, S. L., & Holzman, P. S. (1995). Functional neuroanatomy of antisaccade eye movements investigated with positron emission tomography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(3), 925–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Price, R. B., Kuckertz, J. M., Siegle, G., Ladouceur, C., Silk, J. S., Ryan, N. D., et al. (2015). Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research. Psychological Assessment, 27, 365–376. doi: 10.1037/pas0000036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.Google Scholar
  47. Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. W. (2015). Temporal dynamics of attentional bias. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 772–788. doi: 10.1177/2167702614551572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nader Amir
    • 1
  • Jennie M. Kuckertz
    • 1
  • Marlene V. Strege
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical PsychologySan Diego State University/University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations