Skip to main content
Log in

Social Anxiety and Empathy for Social Pain

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined whether dispositional social anxiety influenced empathy for individuals who experience aversive social events. Participants (N = 121) were randomly assigned to an experimental condition designed to increase state anxiety via social threat or to a control condition. They then observed videos of target individuals discussing high school events in which they were either socially included or excluded. Both participants and targets rated the emotions the targets felt when discussing those situations. Hierarchical linear modeling revealed that social anxiety was associated with greater accuracy for targets’ negative social emotions but only under conditions of social threat. These results suggest that individual differences in social anxiety may influence empathic accuracy for others’ social pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. The significant main effect of social anxiety indicated that social anxiety predicted greater NA accuracy, suggesting that overall, individuals with higher levels of social anxiety were more accurate at rating targets’ negative affect. While interesting, this main effect was qualified by the three-way interaction.

  2. Analyses were also conducted using a discrepancy variable (i.e., the directional difference between participant and target ratings), where negative scores indicate that participants underestimated targets’ negative affect and positive scores indicate that participants overestimated. There was a significant two-way interaction within the exclusion videos, b = -.07, t = 2.38, p = .02. Follow-up analyses revealed that the slope of social anxiety was only significant within the experimental condition, b = .05, t = 2.28, p = .02. On average, individuals with low social anxiety underestimated target affect (M = -6.26, SD = 11.99) more than individuals with high social anxiety (M = −2.92, SD = 10.62).

References

  • Anderson, C., & Keltner, D. (2002). The role of empathy in the formation and maintenance of social bonds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 21–22. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02230010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (Version R package version 0.999375-39). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., & Weisler, R. H. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): New self-rating scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379–386. doi:10.1192/bjp.176.4.379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuming, S., & Rapee, R. M. (2010). Social anxiety and self-protective communication style in close relationships. Behaviour Resea, 48, 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51(2), 167–184. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00860.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Attitudes and Social Cognition, 91, 1–15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberger & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). Social pain: experiential, neurocognitive, and genetic correlates. In A. Todorov, S. T. Fiske, & D. A. Prentice (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind (pp. 229–248). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294–300. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., Ferrari, P. F., & Ultimà, M. A. (2002). The mirror matching system: A shared manifold for intersubjectivity. Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, P. R., Manber, T., Hakimi, S., Canli, T., & Gross, J. J. (2009). Neural bases of social anxiety disorder: Emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation during social and physical threat. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(2), 170–180.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harb, G. C., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2002). The psychometric properties of the interpersonal sensitivity measure in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 961–980. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00125-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., Mueller, G. P., Holt, C. S., & Hope, D. A. (1992). Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behavior Therapy, 23, 53–73. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80308-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappesser, J., Williams, A., & Prkachin, K. M. (2006). Testing two accounts of pain underestimation. Pain, 124, 109–116. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kross, E., Egner, T., Ochsner, K., Hirsch, J., & Downey, G. (2007). Neural dynamics of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 945–956. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371–375. doi:10.1177/0146167283093007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 202–223. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallot, M. A., Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Schmidt, N. B. (2009). Compensatory deficits following rejection: The role of social anxiety in disrupting affiliative behavior. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 438–446. doi:10.1002/da.20555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “Porcupine Problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42–55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, C. L., Gillen-O’Neel, C., & Brown, C. S. (2010). Children’s intergroup empathic processing: The roles of novel ingroup identification, situational distress, and social anxiety. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 115–128. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 455–470. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nordgren, L. F., MacDonald, G., & Banas, K. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: Why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 120–128. doi:10.1037/a0020938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nordgren, L. F., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2006). Visceral drives in retrospect: Explanations about the inaccessible past. Psychological Science, 17, 635–640. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01756.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, M. S., Hougaard, E., & Mennin, D. S. (2013). Social anxiety and emotion knowledge: A meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27(1), 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1095–1107. doi:10.1177/0146167203262085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Romero-Canyas, R., & Downey, G. (2013). What I see when I think it’s about me: People low in rejection-sensitivity downplay cues of rejection in self-relevant interpersonal situations. Emotion, 13(1), 104–117. doi:10.1037/a0029786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safren, S. A., Turk, C. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (1998). Factor structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Grich, J. (1999). When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious-uncertain individuals to a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Kim, J. S., Fillo, J., Ickes, W., Rholes, W. S., Oriña, M., & Winterheld, H. A. (2011). Attachment and the management of empathic accuracy in relationship-threatening situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 242–254. doi:10.1177/0146167210394368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383. doi:10.1037/a0015250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staugaard, S. R. (2010). Threatening faces and social anxiety: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(6), 669–690. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. T., & Alden, L. E. (2011). To see ourselves as others see us: An experimental integration of the intra and interpersonal consequences of self-protection in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 129–141. doi:10.1037/a0022127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. doi:10.1177/0022022106297301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibi-Elhanany, Y., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2011). Social cognition in social anxiety: First evidence for increased empathic abilities. The Isreal Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 48(2), 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A., Simms, E. N., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analysis of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029–1068. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, J. B., Hudson, J. L., & Rapee, R. M. (2007). The effect of attentional focus on social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2326–2333. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.03.01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) to the first author, and a SSHRC research Grant to the second author. There are no other financial disclosures to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen W. Auyeung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Karen W. Auyeung and Lynn E. Alden declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures in the current research were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Behavioural Research Ethics Board at the University of British Columbia (ID# H11-02526). All participants provided fully informed consent.

Animal Rights

No research conducted with animals was carried out by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Auyeung, K.W., Alden, L.E. Social Anxiety and Empathy for Social Pain. Cogn Ther Res 40, 38–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9718-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9718-0

Keywords

Navigation