Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modification of Interpretive Bias: Impact on Anxiety Sensitivity, Information Processing and Response to Induced Bodily Sensations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anxiety Sensitivity (AS) is the fear of normal, arousal-related bodily sensations due to the belief that they have negative consequences. People with high AS impose negative interpretations on bodily sensations. Research shows that interpretive biases can be modified through cognitive training. In this study, the impact of interpretation training on AS, interpretive biases and reactions to bodily sensations was examined in high AS individuals. Participants (N = 34) were assigned to a training condition designed to induce a benign interpretive bias, or a “sham” control condition. Following training, only participants in the training condition reported significant decreases in overall AS and fear of the social and physical consequences of anxiety. In response to vignettes describing ambiguous sensations, only participants in the training condition reported negative explanations of such sensations as less likely to come to mind. Training did not impact reactions to bodily sensations. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, N., Beard, C., Burns, M., & Bomyea, J. (2009). Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, N., & Taylor, C. T. (2012). Combing computerized home-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: An attention modification program and cognitive behavioral therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43, 546–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antony, M. M., Ledley, A. R., Liss, A., & Swinson, R. P. (2006). Responses to symptoms induction exercises in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 85–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C. (2011). Cognitive bias modification for anxiety: Current evidence and future directions. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 11, 299–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2008). A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretations and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1135–1141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C., Weisberg, R. B., & Amir, N. (2011). Combined cognitive bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A pilot trial. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 981–988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Öst, L. G., Brietholtz, E., Koehler, K. A., & Westling, B. E. (1997). Misinterpretations of body sensations in panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 203–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donnell, C. D., & McNally, R. J. (1990). Anxiety sensitivity and panic attacks in a nonclinical population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 83–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A. (1995). A 1-year prospective study of panic attacks: Clinical course and factors associated with maintenance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 164–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S., & Mathews, A. (2000). Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1143–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S., & Mathews, A. (2009). Cognitive bias modification: Priming with an ambiguous homograph is necessary to detect an interpretation training effect. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 338–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R., & Klockars, A. J. (1996). The quest for α: Developments in multiple comparison procedures in the quarter century since Games (1971). Review of Educational Research, 66, 269–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. M., Richards, J. C., Dziadosz, T., & Swindell, A. (1993). Misinterpretation of ambiguous stimuli in panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, C. R., Clark, D. M., & Mathews, A. (2006). Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: Support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Behavior Therapy, 37, 223–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppitt, L., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., & Mackintosh, B. (2010a). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the emotional effects of bias modification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppitt, L., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., & Mackintosh, B. (2010b). Cognitive bias modification: The critical role of active training in modifying emotional responses. Behavior Therapy, 41, 73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamieniecki, G. W., Wade, T., & Tsourtos, G. (1997). Interpretive bias for benign sensations in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 141–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, J. J., Calamari, J. E., & Waraczynski, M. (1996). Panic attack symptomatology and anxiety sensitivity in adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, B., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., Ridgeway, V., & Cook, E. (2006). Induced bias in emotional interpretation influence stress vulnerability and endure despite changes in context. Behavior Therapy, 37, 209–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1994). Panic disorder: A critical analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R., Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Smith, K., & Clark, D. M. (2007). Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1517–1529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olatunji, B. O., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 974–999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity manual (2nd ed.). Worthington, OH: International Diagnostics Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., & McNally, R. J. (1985). The expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107–121). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the predications of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, B. F., Bruce, S. E., Pagano, M. E., Spencer, M. A., & Keller, M. B. (2004). Factor structure and stability of the anxiety sensitivity index in a longitudinal study of anxiety disorder patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 79–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosmarin, D. H., Bourque, L. M., Antony, M. M., & McCabe, R. E. (2009). Interpretation bias in panic disorder: Self-referential or global? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 624–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salemink, E., van den Hout, M. A., Kindt, M., & Rienties, H. (2008). Cognitive bias modification of interpretations: Effects in patients with anxiety disorders. In E. Salemink (Ed.), Believing is seeing: The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety (pp. 119–140). Wageningen, Netherlands: Ponsen and Looijen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Eggleston, A. M., Woolaway-Bickel, K., Fitzpatrick, K. K., Vasey, M. W., & Richey, J. A. (2007). Anxiety sensitivity amelioration training (ASAT): A longitudinal primary prevention program targeting cognitive vulnerability. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 302–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1999). Prospective evaluation of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Replication and extension. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 532–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Richey, J. A., Buckner, J. D., & Timpano, K. R. (2009). Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., & Woolaway-Bickel, K. (2006). Cognitive vulnerability to panic disorder. In L. B. Alloy & J. H. Riskind (Eds.), Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders (pp. 207–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Zvolensky, M. J., & Maner, J. K. (2006). Anxiety sensitivity: Prospective prediction of panic attacks and Axis I pathology. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40, 691–699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorium, P., Janavs, J., & Weiller, E. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 22–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, S. A., & Teachman, B. A. (2010). Modifying interpretations among individuals high in anxiety sensitivity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 71–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2003). Anxiety sensitivity and its implications for understanding and treating PTSD. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 17, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Koch, W. J., & McNally, R. J. (1992). How does anxiety sensitivity vary across the anxiety disorders? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, B. A. (2005). Information processing and anxiety sensitivity: Cognitive vulnerability to panic reflected in interpretation and memory biases. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E. R., & Moberly, N. J. (2009). Concreteness training reduces dysphoria: A pilot proof-of-principle study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 48–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yiend, J., Mackintosh, B., & Mathews, A. (2005). Enduring consequences of experimentally induced biases in interpretation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 779–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Brown, T. A., Barlow, D. H., & Rapee, R. M. (2001). Anxiety sensitivity, panic, and depressed mood: A reanalyses teasing about the contributions of the two levels in the hierarchical structure of the anxiety sensitivity index. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 372–377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B2K3, Canada

    Emma M. MacDonald, Naomi Koerner & Martin M. Antony

Authors
  1. Emma M. MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naomi Koerner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin M. Antony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Koerner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacDonald, E.M., Koerner, N. & Antony, M.M. Modification of Interpretive Bias: Impact on Anxiety Sensitivity, Information Processing and Response to Induced Bodily Sensations. Cogn Ther Res 37, 860–871 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9519-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9519-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation