Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 860–871 | Cite as

Modification of Interpretive Bias: Impact on Anxiety Sensitivity, Information Processing and Response to Induced Bodily Sensations

  • Emma M. MacDonald
  • Naomi Koerner
  • Martin M. Antony
Original Article

Abstract

Anxiety Sensitivity (AS) is the fear of normal, arousal-related bodily sensations due to the belief that they have negative consequences. People with high AS impose negative interpretations on bodily sensations. Research shows that interpretive biases can be modified through cognitive training. In this study, the impact of interpretation training on AS, interpretive biases and reactions to bodily sensations was examined in high AS individuals. Participants (N = 34) were assigned to a training condition designed to induce a benign interpretive bias, or a “sham” control condition. Following training, only participants in the training condition reported significant decreases in overall AS and fear of the social and physical consequences of anxiety. In response to vignettes describing ambiguous sensations, only participants in the training condition reported negative explanations of such sensations as less likely to come to mind. Training did not impact reactions to bodily sensations. Theoretical and methodological implications are discussed.

Keywords

Anxiety sensitivity Interpretation bias Cognitive bias modification 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Amir, N., Beard, C., Burns, M., & Bomyea, J. (2009). Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 28–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amir, N., & Taylor, C. T. (2012). Combing computerized home-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: An attention modification program and cognitive behavioral therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43, 546–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antony, M. M., Ledley, A. R., Liss, A., & Swinson, R. P. (2006). Responses to symptoms induction exercises in panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 85–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beard, C. (2011). Cognitive bias modification for anxiety: Current evidence and future directions. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 11, 299–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2008). A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretations and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 1135–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beard, C., Weisberg, R. B., & Amir, N. (2011). Combined cognitive bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A pilot trial. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 981–988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 461–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Öst, L. G., Brietholtz, E., Koehler, K. A., & Westling, B. E. (1997). Misinterpretations of body sensations in panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 203–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donnell, C. D., & McNally, R. J. (1990). Anxiety sensitivity and panic attacks in a nonclinical population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 83–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehlers, A. (1995). A 1-year prospective study of panic attacks: Clinical course and factors associated with maintenance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 164–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grey, S., & Mathews, A. (2000). Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1143–1162.Google Scholar
  13. Grey, S., & Mathews, A. (2009). Cognitive bias modification: Priming with an ambiguous homograph is necessary to detect an interpretation training effect. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 338–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hancock, G. R., & Klockars, A. J. (1996). The quest for α: Developments in multiple comparison procedures in the quarter century since Games (1971). Review of Educational Research, 66, 269–306.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, J. M., Richards, J. C., Dziadosz, T., & Swindell, A. (1993). Misinterpretation of ambiguous stimuli in panic disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirsch, C. R., Clark, D. M., & Mathews, A. (2006). Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: Support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis. Behavior Therapy, 37, 223–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoppitt, L., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., & Mackintosh, B. (2010a). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the emotional effects of bias modification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 312–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoppitt, L., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., & Mackintosh, B. (2010b). Cognitive bias modification: The critical role of active training in modifying emotional responses. Behavior Therapy, 41, 73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamieniecki, G. W., Wade, T., & Tsourtos, G. (1997). Interpretive bias for benign sensations in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 141–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lau, J. J., Calamari, J. E., & Waraczynski, M. (1996). Panic attack symptomatology and anxiety sensitivity in adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mackintosh, B., Mathews, A., Yiend, J., Ridgeway, V., & Cook, E. (2006). Induced bias in emotional interpretation influence stress vulnerability and endure despite changes in context. Behavior Therapy, 37, 209–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McNally, R. J. (1994). Panic disorder: A critical analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Murphy, R., Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Smith, K., & Clark, D. M. (2007). Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1517–1529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olatunji, B. O., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 974–999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson, R. A., & Reiss, S. (1992). Anxiety sensitivity manual (2nd ed.). Worthington, OH: International Diagnostics Systems.Google Scholar
  27. Reiss, S., & McNally, R. J. (1985). The expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107–121). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the predications of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodriguez, B. F., Bruce, S. E., Pagano, M. E., Spencer, M. A., & Keller, M. B. (2004). Factor structure and stability of the anxiety sensitivity index in a longitudinal study of anxiety disorder patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 79–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosmarin, D. H., Bourque, L. M., Antony, M. M., & McCabe, R. E. (2009). Interpretation bias in panic disorder: Self-referential or global? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 624–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salemink, E., van den Hout, M. A., Kindt, M., & Rienties, H. (2008). Cognitive bias modification of interpretations: Effects in patients with anxiety disorders. In E. Salemink (Ed.), Believing is seeing: The causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety (pp. 119–140). Wageningen, Netherlands: Ponsen and Looijen.Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt, N. B., Eggleston, A. M., Woolaway-Bickel, K., Fitzpatrick, K. K., Vasey, M. W., & Richey, J. A. (2007). Anxiety sensitivity amelioration training (ASAT): A longitudinal primary prevention program targeting cognitive vulnerability. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 302–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1999). Prospective evaluation of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Replication and extension. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 532–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmidt, N. B., Richey, J. A., Buckner, J. D., & Timpano, K. R. (2009). Attention training for generalized social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt, N. B., & Woolaway-Bickel, K. (2006). Cognitive vulnerability to panic disorder. In L. B. Alloy & J. H. Riskind (Eds.), Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders (pp. 207–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt, N. B., Zvolensky, M. J., & Maner, J. K. (2006). Anxiety sensitivity: Prospective prediction of panic attacks and Axis I pathology. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40, 691–699.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorium, P., Janavs, J., & Weiller, E. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 22–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Steinman, S. A., & Teachman, B. A. (2010). Modifying interpretations among individuals high in anxiety sensitivity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 71–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, S. (2003). Anxiety sensitivity and its implications for understanding and treating PTSD. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 17, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor, S., Koch, W. J., & McNally, R. J. (1992). How does anxiety sensitivity vary across the anxiety disorders? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Teachman, B. A. (2005). Information processing and anxiety sensitivity: Cognitive vulnerability to panic reflected in interpretation and memory biases. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Watkins, E. R., & Moberly, N. J. (2009). Concreteness training reduces dysphoria: A pilot proof-of-principle study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 48–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yiend, J., Mackintosh, B., & Mathews, A. (2005). Enduring consequences of experimentally induced biases in interpretation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 779–797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zinbarg, R. E., Brown, T. A., Barlow, D. H., & Rapee, R. M. (2001). Anxiety sensitivity, panic, and depressed mood: A reanalyses teasing about the contributions of the two levels in the hierarchical structure of the anxiety sensitivity index. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 372–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma M. MacDonald
    • 1
  • Naomi Koerner
    • 1
  • Martin M. Antony
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations