Skip to main content
Log in

Interpretation Bias: A Comparison of Treated Social Phobics, Untreated Social Phobics, and Controls1

Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Interpretation bias, defined as the tendency to interpret ambiguous stimuli as threatening, is thought to play a central role in the maintenance of social phobia. However, the effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on this bias has not been determined. The present study examined interpretation bias in individuals with generalized social phobia (GSP) who had been treated with CBT, untreated GSPs, and nonanxious controls (NACs). Results indicated that untreated GSPs had higher negative bias scores than treated GSPs and NACs on a forced-choice measure of interpretation bias, although the latter two groups did not differ. Following study hypotheses, the interpretation bias found in untreated GSPs was specific to social items, and was evident when raters coded participants’ initial written responses to the scenarios, when compared with control subjects. Treated patients had open-ended responses that did not differ from controls or untreated GSPs. Findings are discussed in the context of other GSP interpretation bias studies, and future research directions are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amir, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945–957.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., Stanley, M. A., & Dancu, C. V. (1989). The social phobia and anxiety inventory: Concurrent and external validity. Behavior Therapy, 20, 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research & Therapy, 5, 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders -patient edition (SCID-I/P,version 2.0). New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., Herbert, J. D., & Bellack, A. S. (1995). Comprehensive cognitive behavior therapy for generalized social phobia: A treatment manual. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., & Kozak, M. J. (2001). Social phobia: An information processing perspective. In S. Hofman & P. M. DiBartolo (Eds.), From social anxiety to social phobia: Multiple perspectives (pp. 268–280). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., Perry, K. J., & Herbert, J. D. (1996). Cognitive biases in generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 433–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. E., Jaycox, L. H., & Foa, E. B. (1999). Social phobia: Social skills training. In M. Hersen & A. Bellack (Eds.), Handbook of comparative interventions for adult disorders (2nd ed.), (pp. 317–339). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H., & Hammen, C. L. (1992). Psychological aspects of depression: Toward a cognitive-interpersonal integration. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J. D., Bellack, A. S., Hope, D. A., & Mueser, K. T. (1992). Scoring the social phobia and anxiety inventory: Reply to Beidel and Turner. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14, 381–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1123–1132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, C., & Mathews, A. (2000). Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 705–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, J. D., Foa, E. B., Furr, J., Filips, J., & Mathews, A. M. (2003). Interpretation bias in social anxiety: A dimensional perspective. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 569–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C., & MacLeod, C. (1999). Depression and the interpretation of ambiguity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 463–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattia, J. I., Heimberg, R. G., & Hope, D. A. (1993). The revised Stroop color-naming task in social phobics. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 305–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2000). Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 602–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, F., Clark, D. M., and Hackmann, A. (2000). Specificity of cognitive biases in social phobia and their role in recovery. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., & Foa, E. B. (1987). Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cogntive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, B. J., McNeil, D. W., Boone, M. L., Turk, C. L., Carter, L. E., & Heimberg, R. G. (1998). Assessment of contemporary social phobia verbal report instruments. Behavior Research and Therapy, 36, 983–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stopa, L., & Clark, D. M. (2000). Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., Dancu, C. V., & Stanley, M. A. (1989). An empirically derived inventory to measure social fears and anxiety: The social phobia and anxiety scale. Psychological Assessment, 1, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., & Jacob, R. G. (1994). Social phobia: A comparison of behavior therapy and atenolol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 350–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voncken, M. J., Bogels, S. M., & de Vries, K. (2003). Interpretation and judgmental biases in social phobia. Behavior Research and Therapy, 41, 1481–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin E. Franklin.

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franklin, M.E., Huppert, J., Langner, R. et al. Interpretation Bias: A Comparison of Treated Social Phobics, Untreated Social Phobics, and Controls1. Cogn Ther Res 29, 289–300 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-2412-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-2412-8

Keywords

Navigation