Skip to main content
Log in

The Looming Cognitive Style and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Distinctive Danger Schemas and Cognitive Phenomenology

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While great strides have been made in understanding the nature, role, and maintenance of maladaptive cognitive and affective avoidance strategies in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), much remains to be learned about the nature of threat appraisals that are instigators of such compensatory self-protective responses. The looming cognitive style (LCS) is characterized by a distinctive cognitive phenomenology and tendency to construct mental scenarios and appraisals of unfolding threat and increasing danger. Research shows that the LCS functions as a danger schema and is related to worry and anxiety but not depression. Two studies were conducted to examine the role of the LCS in GAD. Results of these studies suggest that the LCS is present at higher levels in GADs but not in non-GADS or unipolar depressives. Study 1 used an analogue sample of students with a probable diagnosis of GAD. Study 2 investigated the distinctiveness and specificity of the LCS in clinically diagnosed patients and nonpsychopathology controls. Results of Study 2 indicate that the LCS is present in clinical GADs but not unipolar depressive disorders or nonpsychopathology controls. Collectively, results of both studies suggest that the LCS uniquely contributes to the discrimination and classification of GAD beyond the effects of anxious and depressive symptoms, worry, and thought suppression. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for extending current cognitive conceptualizations of GAD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Raniere, D., & Dyller, I. (1999). Research methods in adult psychopathology. In P. C. Kendall, J. N. Butcher & G. N. Holmbeck (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 49–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 49–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Emery, G. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R., & Perkins, T. S. (2001). Cognitive content-specificity for anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 651–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The nature, functions, and origins of worry. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory assessment, and treatment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D., & Inz, J. (1990). The nature of worry in generalized anxiety disorder: A predominance of thought activity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 153–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borkovec, T. D., Ray, W. J., & Stoeber, J. (1998). Worry: A cognitive phenomenon intimately linked to affective, physiological, and interpersonal behavioral processes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 561–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., DiNardo, P. A., Lehman, C. L., & Campbell, L. A. (2001). Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for classification of emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 49–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, M. J., Gagnon, F., Ladouceur, R., & Freeston, M. H. (1998). Generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary test of a conceptual model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 215–226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. L., & Durham, R. A. (1999). Recovery rates in generalized anxiety disorder following psychological therapy: An analysis of clinically significant change in STAI-T across outcome studies since 1990. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1425–1434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geer, J. H. (1965). The development of a scale to measure fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3, 45–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolutionary approaches to psychopathology: The role of natural defenses. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 17–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, P. E., Sisitsky, T., Kessler, R. C., Finkelstein, S. N., Berndt, E. R., Davidson, J. R. T., et al. (1999). The economic burden of anxiety disorders in the 1990s. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 60, 427–435.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1958). The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 32, 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn-Saric, R., Hazlett, R. L., & McLeod, D. R. (1993). Generalized anxiety disorder with early and late onset of anxiety symptoms. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 34, 291–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. (1983). A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2002). Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–496.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. G., Zuellig, A. R., Kachin, K. E., Costantino, M. J., Przeworski, A., Erickson, T., et al. (2002). Preliminary reliability and validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV: A revised self-report diagnostic measure of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 33, 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, R., Woodman, C., Garvey, M. J., Cook, B. L., Suelzer, M., Clancy, J., et al. (1992). Generalized anxiety disorder versus panic disorder: Distinguishing characteristics and patterns of comorbidity. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 396–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A., (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskind, J. H. (1997). Looming vulnerability to threat: A cognitive paradigm for anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskind, J. H. (2004). Looming cognitive style and affect regulation. Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University.

  • Riskind, J. H., & Alloy, L. B. (in press). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders: Theory, design, and methods. In L. B. Alloy & J. H. Riskind (Eds.), Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. New Jersey: Earlbaum.

  • Riskind, J. H., & Williams, N. L. (in press a). A unique vulnerability common to all anxiety disorders: The looming maladaptive style. In L. B. Alloy & J. H. Riskind (Eds.), Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. New Jersey: Earlbaum.

  • Riskind, J. H., & Williams, N. L. (in press b). Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety: The looming cognitive style as a superordinate vulnerability factor to anxiety disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.

  • Riskind, J. H., Williams, N. L., Gessner, T., Chrosniak, L. D., & Cortina, J. (2000). The looming maladaptive style: Anxiety, danger, and schematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 837–852.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, L., Borkovec, M., Posa, S., & Borkovec, T. D. (1995). A self-report diagnostic measure of generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 345–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2002). Expanding our conceptualization of and treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: Integrating mindfulness/acceptance-based approaches with existing cognitive behavioral models. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanavio, E. (1988). Obsessions and compulsions: The Padua Inventory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 169–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Pham, L. B., Rivkin, I. D., & Armor, D. A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental stimulation, self-regulation, and coping. American Psychologist, 53, 429–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1124–1131.

  • van Oppen, P., Hoekstra, R. J., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1995). The structure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 15–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, N. L. (2002). The cognitive interactional model of appraisal and coping: Implications for anxiety and depression. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax.

  • Williams, N. L., Olatunji, B. O., Riskind, J. H., & Elwood, L. S. (in press). Cognitive vulnerabilities to contamination fears and obsessional thoughts.

  • Williams, N. L., Shahar, G., Riskind, J. H., & Joiner, T. E. (in press). The looming cognitive style has a general effect on an anxiety disorder symptoms factor: Further support for a cognitive model of vulnerability to anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John H. Riskind.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riskind, J.H., Williams, N.L. The Looming Cognitive Style and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Distinctive Danger Schemas and Cognitive Phenomenology. Cogn Ther Res 29, 7–27 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-1645-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-1645-z

Key words

Navigation