Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 27, Issue 3–6, pp 569–607 | Cite as

The Effect of Collaboration Styles and View Independence on Video-Mediated Remote Collaboration

  • Seungwon Kim
  • Mark Billinghurst
  • Gun Lee
Article
  • 247 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates how different collaboration styles and view independence affect remote collaboration. Our remote collaboration system shares a live video of a local user’s real-world task space with a remote user. The remote user can have an independent view or a dependent view of a shared real-world object manipulation task and can draw virtual annotations onto the real-world objects as a visual communication cue. With the system, we investigated two different collaboration styles; (1) remote expert collaboration where a remote user has the solution and gives instructions to a local partner and (2) mutual collaboration where neither user has a solution but both remote and local users share ideas and discuss ways to solve the real-world task. In the user study, the remote expert collaboration showed a number of benefits over the mutual collaboration. With the remote expert collaboration, participants had better communication from the remote user to the local user, more aligned focus between participants, and the remote participants’ feeling of enjoyment and togetherness. However, the benefits were not always apparent at the local participants’ end, especially with measures of enjoyment and togetherness. The independent view also had several benefits over the dependent view, such as allowing remote participants to freely navigate around the workspace while having a wider fully zoomed-out view. The benefits of the independent view were more prominent in the mutual collaboration than in the remote expert collaboration, especially in enabling the remote participants to see the workspace.

Keywords

Annotation Augmented Reality Awareness Independent View Remote Collaboration 

References

  1. Adcock, Matt and Chris Gunn (2015). Using Projected Light for Mobile Remote Guidance. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 24, no. 6, December 2015 pp. 591–611.Google Scholar
  2. Alem, Leila, Franco Tecchia and Weidong Huang (2011). Remote Tele-assistance System for Maintenance Operators in Mines. In Naj Aziz (ed): Coal2011. Proceedings of Underground Coal Operators' Conference, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 10-11 Febrary 2011. Wollongong: University of Wollongong, pp. 171–177.Google Scholar
  3. Antunes, Pedro, and Antonio Ferreira (2011). Developing collaboration awareness support from a cognitive perspective. In Jr. Ralph H. Sprague (ed): HICSS'44. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2011. Washington DC: IEEE computer society, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  4. Beaudouin-Lafon, Michel and Alain Karsenty (1992). Transparency and Awareness in a Real-time Groupware System. In Jock Mackinlay and Mark Green (eds): UIST '92. Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Monteray, California, 15-18 November 1992. New York: ACM Press, pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
  5. Benford, Steve, Chris Greenhalgh, Tom Rodden and James Pycock (2001). Collaborative virtual environments. Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, no. 7, July 2001, pp. 79–85.Google Scholar
  6. Billinghurst, Mark, Adrian Cheok, Simon Prince and Hirokazu Kato (2002). Real world teleconferencing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 22, no. 6, December 2002, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
  7. Bly, Sara A., Steve R. Harrison and Susan Irwin (1993). Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no. 1, January 1993. pp. 28–46.Google Scholar
  8. Brubaker, Jed R., Gina Venolia and John C. Tang (2012). Focusing on Shared Experiences : Moving Beyond the Camera in Video Communication. In DIS'12. Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 11–15 June 2012. New York: ACM, pp. 96–105Google Scholar
  9. Cidota, Marina, Stephan Lukosch, Dragos Datcu and Heide Lukosch, (2016). Comparing the Effect of Audio and Visual Notifications on Workspace Awareness Using Head-Mounted Displays for Remote Collaboration in Augmented Reality, Augmented Human Research (AH Research), vol. 1, no. 1, October 2016, pp. 1–15Google Scholar
  10. Cockburn, Andrew and Saul Greenberg (1993). Making Contact: Getting the Group Communicating with Groupware. In Simon Kaplan (ed):COCS '93. Proceedings of the Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, Milpitas, California, USA, 01–04 November 1993. New York: ACM, pp. 31–41.Google Scholar
  11. Dourish, Pau and Victoria Bellotti (1992) Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. In Marilyn Mantel and Ron Baecker (eds):CSCW '92. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 01–04 November 1992. New York: ACM, pp. 107–114.Google Scholar
  12. Fakourfar, Omid, Kevin Ta, Richard Tang, Scott Bateman and Anthony Tang (2016) Stabilized Annotations for Mobile Remote Assistance. In Jofish Kaye, Allison Druin, Cliff Lampe, Dan Morris, and Juan Pablo Hourcade (eds):CHI'16. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM Press, San Jose, CA, USA, 07–12 May 2016. New York: ACM pp 1548–1560Google Scholar
  13. Ferreira, Antonio, Pedro Antunes and Valeria Herskovic (2011) Improving Group Attention: An Experiment with Synchronous Brainstorming, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 20, no. 5, February 2011, pp. 643–666Google Scholar
  14. Fish, Robert S., Robert E. Kraut and Barbara L. Chalfonte (1990) The VideoWindow system in informal communication. In Frank Halasz (ed):CSCW '90. Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, California, USA, 07–10 October 1990. New York: ACM, pp. 1–11Google Scholar
  15. Fussell Susan R, Leslie D. Setlock, Jie Yang, Jiazhi Ou and Elizabeth Mauer (2004) Gestures Over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 19, no. 3, September 2004. pp. 273–309.Google Scholar
  16. Fussell Susan R, Leslie D. Setlock and Robert E. Kraut (2003). Effects of head-mounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. In Gilbert Cockton and Panu Korhonen (eds): CHI '03. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 05–10 April 2003. New York: ACM, pp. 513–520Google Scholar
  17. Gauglitz, Steffen, Cha Lee, Matthew Turk and Tobias Hollerer, (2012). Integrating the physical environment into mobile remote collaboration. In Elizabeth Churchill, Sriram Subramanian, Patrick Baudisch, and Kenton O'Hara (eds):MobileHCI '12. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. San Francisco, California, USA, 21–24 September 2012. New York: ACM. pp. 241–250Google Scholar
  18. Gauglitz, Steffen, Benjamin Nuernberger, Matthew Turk and Tobias Hollerer (2014). World-stabilized annotations and virtual scene navigation for remote collaboration. In Hrvoje Benko, Mira Dontcheva, and Daniel Wigdor (eds): UIST '14, Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 05–08 October 2014. New York: ACM pp. 449–459.Google Scholar
  19. Gaver, William W (1991). Sound Support For Collaboration. In: Bannon L., Robinson M., Schmidt K. (eds):ECSCW'91. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1991. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 293–308.Google Scholar
  20. Gaver, William W (1992). The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In Marilyn Mantel and Ron Baecker (eds): CSCW '92. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 01-04 November 1992. New York: ACM pp. 17–24Google Scholar
  21. Gergle, Darren, Robert E. Kraut and Susan R. Fussell (2013). Using visual information for grounding and awareness in collaborative tasks. Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 28, no. 1, 27 Mar 2012, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  22. Greenberg, Saul and Carl Gutwin (2016). Implications of We-Awareness to the Design of Distributed Groupware Tools. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 25, no. 4–5, October 2016, pp. 279–293.Google Scholar
  23. Gurevich, Pavel, Joel Lanir and Benjamin Cohen (2015). Design and Implementation of TeleAdvisor: a Projection-Based Augmented Reality System for Remote Collaboration, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 24, no. 6, December 2015, pp. 527–562Google Scholar
  24. Gutwin, Carl and Saul Greenberg (1996). Workspace awareness for groupware. In Bonnie Nardi, Gerrit C. Veer, and Michael J. Tauber (eds): CHI '96, Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 13–18 April 1996. New York: ACM. pp. 208–209.Google Scholar
  25. Gutwin, Carl and Saul Greenberg (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 11, no. 3–4, September 2002, pp. 411–446.Google Scholar
  26. Gutwin, Carl and Saul Greenberg (1999). The Effects of Workspace Awareness Support on the Usability of Real-Time Distributed Groupware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 6, no. 3, Sept. 1999, pp. 243–281Google Scholar
  27. Gutwin, Carl and Saul Greenberg (1998). Designfor Individuals, Design for Groups: Tradeoffs BeWeen Power and Workspace Awareness. In Steven Poltrock and Jonathan Grudin (eds): CSCW '98. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, Washington, USA, 14–18 November 1998. New York: ACM. pp. 207–216Google Scholar
  28. Gutwin, Carl, Oliver Schneider, Robert Xiao and Stephen Brewster (2011). Chalk Sounds : The Effects of Dynamic Synthesized Audio on Workspace Awareness in Distributed Groupware. In Pamela Hinds, John C. Tang, Jian Wang, Jakob Bardram, and Nicolas Duchenenaut (eds): CSCW'11. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Hangzhou, China, 19-23 March 2011. New York: ACM, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  29. Ishii, Hiroshi, Minoru Kobayashi and Kazuho Arita (1994) Iterative design of seamless collaboration media. Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, no. 8, Aug. 1994, pp. 83–97Google Scholar
  30. Ishii, Hiroshi, Minoru Kobayashi and Jonathan Grudin (1992) Integration of Interpersonal Space and Shared Workspace - ClearBoard Design and Experiments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS). Volume 11 Issue 4, Oct. 1993, pp. 349–375Google Scholar
  31. Hauber, Joerg (2008) Understanding Remote Collaboration in Video Collaborative Virtual Environments. Christchurch New Zealand: University of Canterbury Press. Doctoral dissertation from University of CanterburyGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, Seungwon, Gun A. Lee and Nobuchika Sakata (2013) Comparing pointing and drawing for remote collaboration. In Mark Billinghurst and Bruce H. Thomas (eds):ISMAR'13. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Adelaide, SA, Australia, 1–4 October 2013. Washington DC: IEEE computer society pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  33. Kim, Seungwon, Gun A. Lee, Sangtae Ha, Nobuchika Sakata and Mark Billinghurst, (2015) Automatically Freezing Live Video for Annotation during Remote Collaboration. In Bo Begole, Jinwoo Kim, Kori Inkpen, and Woontack Woo (eds): CHI EA '15. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul Korea. 18–23 April 2015. New York: ACM, pp 1669–1674Google Scholar
  34. Kim, Seungwon, Gun A. Lee, Nobuchika Sakata and Mark Billinghurst (2014). Improving co-presence with augmented visual communication cues for sharing experience through video conference. In Gudrun Klinker and Nassir Navab (eds): ISMAR'14. Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). Munich, Germany, 10-12 September 2014. Washington DC: IEEE computer society, pp 83–92Google Scholar
  35. Kirk, David, Tom Rodden and Danaë Stanton Fraser (2007). Turn It This Way: Grounding Collaborative Action with Remote Gestures. In Mary Beth Rosson and David Gilmore (eds): CHI'07. Proceedings of the CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA, 28 April - 03 May, 2007. New York: ACM. pp. 1039–1048Google Scholar
  36. Kurata, Takeshi, Nobuchika Sakata, Masakatsu Kourogi, Hideaki Kuzauoka and Mark Billinghurst (2004). Remote collaboration using a shoulder-worn active camera/laser. In: ISWC'04. Proceeding of the Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computer. Arlington, Virginia, 31 October - 03 November 2004. Washington DC: IEEE computer society, pp. 62–69.Google Scholar
  37. Kuzuoka, Hideaki, Gen Ishimoda, Yushi Nishimura, Ryutaro Suzuki and Kimio Kondo (1995) Can the GestureCam be a surrogate? In H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad, and K. Schmidt (eds): ECSCW'95. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Stockholm, Sweden, 10–14 September 1995. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 181–196.Google Scholar
  38. Kuzuoka, Hideaki, Toshio Kosuge and Masatomo Tanaka (1994) GestureCam: A video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration. In John B. Smith, F. Don Smith, and Thomas W. Malone (eds): CSCW '94. Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, 22–26 October 1994. New York: ACM, pp. 35–43.Google Scholar
  39. Lauwers, J. Chris and Keith A. Lantz (1990) Collaboration awareness in support of collaboration transparency: requirements for the next generation of shared window systems. In Jane C. Chew and John Whiteside (eds): CHI '90. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington, USA, 01–05 April 1990. New York: ACM, pp. 303–311Google Scholar
  40. Lukosch, Stephan, Heide Lukosch, Dragos Datcu and Marina Cidota (2015) Providing Information on the Spot: Using Augmented Reality for Situational Awareness in the Security Domain. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) vol. 24, no. 6, December 2015. pp. 613–664Google Scholar
  41. O'Hara, Kenton, Alison Black and Matthew Lipson (2006) Everyday practices with mobile video telephony. In Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (eds): CHI '06. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, 22–27 April 2006. New York: ACM. pp. 871–880Google Scholar
  42. Olson, Gary M. and Judith S. Olson (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 15, no. 2, September 2000, pp. 139–178Google Scholar
  43. Poelman, Ronald, Oytun Akman, Stephan Lukosch and Pieter Jonker (2012) As if being there: mediated reality for crime scene investigation, In Steven Poltrock and Carla Simon (eds): CSCW '12. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington, USA, 11–15 February 2012. New York: ACM pp. 1267–1276Google Scholar
  44. Reichherzer, Carolin, Alaeddin Nassani and Mark Billinghurst (2014) [Poster] Social panoramas using wearable computers. In Gudrun Klinker and Nassir Navab (eds): ISMAR'14. Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Munich, Germany, 10-12 September 2014. Washington DC: IEEE computer society, pp. 303–304Google Scholar
  45. Rekimoto, Jun and Katashi Nagao (1995) The World through the Computer: Computer Augmented Interaction with Real World Environments. In George Robertson (ed):UIST'95. Proceedings of the 8th annual ACM symposium on User interface and software technology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 15–17 November 1995. New York: ACM, pp. 29–36Google Scholar
  46. Roseman, Mark and Saul Greenberg (1996) Building real-time groupware with GroupKit, a groupware toolkit. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) vol. 3, Issue 1, March 1996. pp. 66–106Google Scholar
  47. Sakata, Nobuchika, Takeshi Kurata, Takekazu Kato, Masakatsu Kourogi and Hideaki Kuzuoka (2003). WACL: supporting telecommunications using wearable active camera with laser pointer. In ISWC'03. Proceedings Seventh IEEE International Symposium Wearable Computer 2003, White Plains, NY, USA, 21–23 October 2003. Washington DC: IEEE computer society, pp. 53–56.Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt, Kjeld (2002) The Problem with ‘Awareness’: Introductory Remarks on ‘Awareness in CSCW’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) vol. 11, no. 3, 2002, pp. 285–298Google Scholar
  49. Snowdon, Dave, Elizabeth F. Churchill and Alan J. Munro (2000) Collaborative Virtual Environments: Digital Spaces and Places for CSCW. London: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  50. Stefik, M, Bobrow DG, Foster G (1987) WYSIWIS Revised : Early Experiences with Multiuser Interfaces. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 5, No. 2, April 1987, pp. 147–167Google Scholar
  51. Tait, Matthew and Mark Billinghurs (2015) The Effect of View Independence in a Collaborative AR System. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 24, no. 6, Springer Netherlands, pp. 563–589Google Scholar
  52. Tan, Wei, Haomin Liu, Zilong Dong, Guofeng Zhang and Hujun Bao, (2013) Robust monocular SLAM in dynamic environments, In Mark Billinghurst and Bruce H. Thomas (eds):ISMAR'13. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Adelaide, SA, Australia, 1–4 October 2013. Washington DC: IEEE computer society, pp. 209–218Google Scholar
  53. Tang, John C. and Scott L. Minneman (1991) Videodraw: a video interface for collaborative drawing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), vol. 9, no. 2, April 1991, pp. 170–184Google Scholar
  54. Tsubaki, Ikuko, Toshiya Morita, Takahiro Saito and Kiyoharu Aizawa (2005) An adaptive video stabilization method for reducing visually induced motion sickness. In ICIP 2005. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Genova, Italy, 14 September 2005. Washington DC: IEEE computer society, pp. 497–500Google Scholar
  55. Whittaker, Steve (1995) Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), vol. 42, no. 5, May 1995, pp. 501–529.Google Scholar
  56. Wobbrock, Jacob O., Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle and James J. Higgins (2011) The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. In Desney Tan (ed): CHI '11. Proceedings of CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 07–12 May 2011. New York: ACM pp. 143–146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The School of Information Technology and Mathematical SciencesThe University of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia

Personalised recommendations