From Object-Oriented to Fluid Ontology: a Case Study of the Materiality of Design Work in Agile Software Development

Abstract

In much of extant research on design cooperation, design materials are approached from noun-oriented ontologies and social topologies where the notion of ‘object’ is central. There is a long history of critique concerning such ontologies, most recently coming from the anthropology of making, because they are failing to capture the dynamic and fluid aspects that characterize the living, constantly changing world that we inhabit. Though often recognized, the implications these critiques have for design cooperation research and practice have been drawn only to a limited extent. In this study, we discuss and empirically examine such implications by adopting a fluid ontology in the analysis of design cooperation. We use data from design conversations in a firm that practices extreme programming, a form of agile software development, to exhibit what theorizing design activity in terms of fluid things, fluid spaces, and continuity has to offer to practitioners and analysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Object’ may also be used in the sense of goal or aim at which an intention or effort is directed. In this sense, too, the object is in the form of a noun and treated as a ‘blob.’

  2. 2.

    An Institutional (ethics) Review Board approved the study; all individuals appearing in the video recordings signed ethics forms, which also granted them confidentiality.

  3. 3.

    Actually, the reactions from the desktop lead during the afternoon session show that the two developers were perceived to have worked on a ‘simple editor’ rather than on the design of a ‘simplest editor.’

  4. 4.

    Rendering refers to the process that transforms algorithms into the images that can be seen on the display device.

  5. 5.

    In a material phenomenology, consciousness arises from the self-affection of life; this radically immanent self-affection ‘is nothing other than our flesh [chair]’ (Henry 2000, p. 173).

  6. 6.

    Dewey and Bentley (1949/1999) use between and in-between synonymously, opposing it to the use of inter- as ‘mutually’ and ‘reciprocally.’ Our use of in-between is in the latter sense.

  7. 7.

    Dewey and Bentley (1949/1999, p. 138) also use the adjective ‘intra-organic transactional.’

References

  1. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1993a). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1993b). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.

  3. Bateson, Gregory (1936). Naven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  4. Bateson, Gregory (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary Unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.

  5. Bateson, Gregory (1987). Steps to an ecology of mind . Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

  6. Bateson, Gregory (1996). Communication. In Hartmut B. Mokros (eds), Interaction & identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 45–70.

  7. Beck, Kent (1999). Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer , vol. 32 (no. 10), pp. 70–77.

  8. Beck, Kent et al. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Accessed 30 November 2015 at http://agilemanifesto.org/

  9. Bedny, Gregory; and Waldemar Karwowski (2007). A systemic-structural theory of activity: Applications to human performance and work design. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

  10. Binder, Thomas, Giorgio De Michelis, Pelle Ehn, Giulio Jacucci, Per Linde and Ina Wagner (2011). Design things . Cambridge: MIT Press.

  11. Birdwhistell, Ray L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  12. Bossen, Claus, Lotte Groth Jensen and Flemming Witt Udsen (2014). Boundary-object trimming: On the invisibility of medical secretaries’ care of records in healthcare infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 23, pp. 75–110.

  13. Boujut, Jean-François and Eric Blanco (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work , Vol. 12, pp. 205–219.

  14. Bucchiarelli, Louis L. (2002). Between thought and object in engineering design. Design Studies , vol. 23, pp. 219–231.

  15. Cabitza, Federico and Carla Simone. (2013). Computational coordination mechanisms: A tale of a struggle for flexibility. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 22, pp. 475–529.

  16. Callon, Michel (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieux Bay. In John Law (ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196–233.

  17. Crabtree, Andy (2000). Talking work: language-games, organisations and computer supported cooperative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol 9, pp. 215–237.

  18. Cole, Michael and Yrjö Engeström (1993). A cultural historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–46.

  19. Davidson, Donald (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In Ernest Lepore (ed.), Truth and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 433–446.

  20. Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari (1980). Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

  21. Dewey, John and Arthur F. Bentley (1999). Knowing and the known. In Rollo Handy and E. C. Harwood (eds.), Useful procedures of inquiry. Great Barrington, MA: Behavioral Research Council, pp. 97–209. (First published in 1949)

  22. Eckert, Claudia and Jean-François Boujut (2003). The role of objects in design co-operation: Communication through physical or virtual objects. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 12, pp. 145–151.

  23. Engeström, Yrjö (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–103.

  24. Engeström, Yrjö (2005). Why some social network services work and others don’t—Or: the case for object-centered sociality. http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why-some-social-network-services-work-and-others-dont-or-the-case-for-object-centered-sociality.html. Accessed 1 November 2015.

  25. Fenwick, Tara, Richard Edwards and Peter Sawchuck (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the Sociomaterial. London: Routledge.

  26. Fjeld, Morten, Kristina Lauche, Martin Bichsel, Fred Voorhorst, Helmut Krueger and Mattthias Rauterberg (2002). Physical and virtual tools: Activity theory applied to the design of groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) , vol. 2, pp. 153–180.

  27. Garfinkel, Harold (1996). Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 59, pp. 5–21.

  28. Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey Sacks (1986). On formal structures of practical action. In Harold Garfinkel (ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 160–193.

  29. Glock, Friedrich (2003). Design tools and framing practices. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 12, pp. 221–239.

  30. Goodwin, Charles (2003). The semiotic body in its environment. In J. Coupland and R. Gwyn (eds.), Discourses of the body. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 19–42.

  31. Harman, Graham (2009). Prince of networks. Bruno Latour and metaphysics . Melbourne: Re.press.

  32. Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh and Paul Luff (2010). Video in qualitative research. London: Sage.

  33. Heidegger, Martin (1977). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

  34. Henderson, Kathryn (1998). The role of material objects in the design process: A comparison of two design cultures and how they contend with automation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 23, pp. 139–174.

  35. Henry, Michel (2000). Incarnation: Une philosophie de la chair. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

  36. Hogle, Linda F. (1995). Standardization across domains: The case of organ procurement. Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 20, pp. 482–500.

  37. Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed). Cambridge: Polity Press.

  38. Il’enkov, Evald V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays in its history and theory. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

  39. Il’enkov, Evald V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

  40. Ingalls, Paul and Troy Frever. (2009). Growing an agile culture from value seeds. In 2009 Agile Conference, pp. 119–124. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2009.42.

  41. Ingold, Tim (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.

  42. Ingold, Tim (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.

  43. Ingold, Tim (2015). The life of lines. London: Routledge.

  44. Jefferson, Gail (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger and P. Bull (eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 166–196.

  45. Jefferson, Gail (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–31.

  46. Jordan, Brigitte; and Austin Henderson (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 39–103.

  47. Jornet, Alfredo and Wolff-Michael Roth. (2017). Design {thinking | communicating}: A sociogenetic approach to reflective practice in collaborative design. In J. Abildgaard, L. Ball, B. T. Christensen, and K. Halskov (eds.), Analysing design thinking: Studies of cross-Ccultural co-creation. Boca Raton: CRC Press. (In press).

  48. Jornet, Alfredo and Rolf Steier (2015). The matter of space: Bodily performances and the emergence of boundary objects during disciplinary design meetings. Mind, Culture, and Activity , vol. 22, pp. 129–151.

  49. Kant, Immanuel (1956). Werke Band II. Wiesbaden: Insel Verlag.

  50. Lektorsky, Vladislav A. (1984). Subject, object, cognition. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

  51. Leont’ev, Alexei N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

  52. Livingston, Eric (1986). The ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  53. Livingston, Eric (2008). Ethnographies of reason. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  54. Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (1978). Werke Band 3. Berlin: Dietz.

  55. Mayernik, Matthew S., Jillian C. Wallis and Christine L. Borgman (2013). Unearthing the infrastructure: Humans and sensors in field-based scientific research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 22, pp. 65–101.

  56. McDermott, Ray P., Kenneth Gospodinoff and Jeffrey Aron (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, vol. 24, pp. 245–275.

  57. McDermott, Ray and David R. Roth (1978). The social organization of behavior: Interactional approaches. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 7, pp. 321–345.

  58. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.

  59. Merz, Martina and Karin Knorr Cetina (1997). Deconstruction in a ‘thinking science’: Theoretical physicists at work. Social Studies of Science, vol. 27, pp. 73–111.

  60. Mikhailov, Felix T. (2001). The ‘Other Within’ for the psychologist. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 6–31.

  61. Mikhailov, Felix T. (2004). Object-oriented activity—Whose?. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 6–34.

  62. Mol, Annemarie and John Law (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, vol. 24, pp. 641–671.

  63. Monteiro, Marko (2015). Reconfiguring evidence: Interacting with digital objects in scientific practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 19, pp. 335–354.

  64. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1954). Werke in drei Bänden Bd. 3. Munich: Hanser.

  65. Ploderer, Bernd, Wally Smith, Jon Pearce, and Ron Borland (2015). An object-centred approach to encourage online participation in the context of behaviour change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 24: 39–64.

  66. Ricœur, Paul (1986). Du texte à l’action: Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

  67. Rorty, Richard (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  68. Romano, Claude (1998). L’événement et le monde. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  69. Roth, Wolff-Michael (2004). Perceptual gestalts in workplace communication. Journal of Pragmatics , vol. 36, pp. 1037–1069.

  70. Roth, Wolff-Michael (2015). Excess of graphical thinking: Movement, mathematics and flow. For the Learning of Mathematics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 2–7.

  71. Roth, Wolff-Michael (2016). The primacy of the social and sociogenesis. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 50, 122–141.

  72. Roth, Wolff-Michael and Alfredo Jornet (2016). Theorizing with/out mediators. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9376-0

  73. Roth, Wolff-Michael, David Socha and Josh Tenenberg (2016). Becoming-design in corresponding: Re/theorizing the co- in codesigning. CoDesign, vol. 13, pp. 1–15.

  74. Saaed, Saqib, Markus Rohde and Volker Wulf (2011). Analyzing political activists’ organization practices: Findings from a long term case study of the European social forum. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 20, pp. 265–304.

  75. Schütz, Alfred (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Vienna: Julius Springer.

  76. Smith, Barry (2003). Ontology. In L. Floridi (ed.), Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 155–166.

  77. Socha, David (2015). BeamCoffer dataset: Professional software developers collaborating in the wild. University of Washington Bothell CSS Technical Report. University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA. (unpublished).

  78. Socha, David and Kevin Sutanto (2015). The ‘pair’ as a problematic unit of analysis for pair programming. In CHASE 2015: Proceedings of the eighth international workshop on cooperative and human aspects of software engineering. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, pp. 64–70.

  79. Sørensen, Estrid (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  80. Subrahmanian, Eswaran, Ira Monarch, Suresh Konda, Helen Granger, Russ Milliken, Arthur Westerberg and the N-Dim Group (2003). Boundary objects and prototypes at the interfaces of engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 12, pp. 185–203.

  81. Suchman, Lucy A. and Randy H. Trigg (1993). Artificial intelligence as craftwork. In S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 144–178.

  82. Vološinov, Valentin N. (1930). Marksizm i folosofija jazyka: osnovye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda b nauke o jazyke. Leningrad: Priboj.

  83. Vygotsky, Lev S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Springer.

  84. Vygotsky, Lev S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 53–77.

  85. Vygotsky, Lev S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Springer.

  86. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1997). Philosophical investigations / Philosophische Untersuchungen (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell. (First published in 1953)

  87. Yasuoka, Mika (2015). Collaboration across professional boundaries—The emergence of interpretation drift and the collective creation of project jargon. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 24, pp. 253–276.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Alfredo Jornet contributed while holding a post-doctoral fellowship co-funded by the National Research Council of Norway and Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolff-Michael Roth.

Appendix A: Transcription conventions

Appendix A: Transcription conventions

The transcription conventions are those of standard conversation analysis (Jefferson 2004). All words are written using small letters (unless exception noted below); they are run together when the corresponding sound wave is.

figureg

Episode 1

figureh

Episode 2

figurei

Episode 3

figurej

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roth, WM., Jornet, A. From Object-Oriented to Fluid Ontology: a Case Study of the Materiality of Design Work in Agile Software Development. Comput Supported Coop Work 27, 37–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9297-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Objects
  • Ontology
  • Social topology
  • Fluids
  • Lines
  • Materiality
  • Communication
  • Extreme programming
  • Agile software development