Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Open Data, Crowdsourcing and Game Mechanics. A case study on civic participation in the digital age

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to shed light on the dynamics of civic participation, media agency, and data practices. To do so we analyse an investigative journalism story run by The Guardian that combined open data, crowdsourcing and game mechanics with the purpose of engaging readers. The case study highlights how data can be made accessible to people who usually do not have access; how game mechanics can be deployed in order to foster civic participation by offering users a sense of autonomy, competence and relatedness; and how crowdsourcing can organise a large group of people into achieving a common goal. The combination of these three elements resulted in a case for civic participation in the digital era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, Richard P. and Judy Goggin (2005). What do we mean by ‘Civic Engagment’? Journal of Transformative Education, vol.3, no.3, pp. 236-253.

  • Aitamurto, Tanja (2015). Crowdsourcing as a Knowledge-Search Method in Digital Journalism: Ruptured ideals and blended responsibility. Digital Journalism, (ahead-of-print), pp. 1-18

  • Andersen, Michael. (2009). Four crowdsourcing lessons from the Guardian’s (spectacular) expenses-scandal experiment. NiemanLab, (June 23, 2009). http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/four-crowdsourcing-lessons-from-the-guardians-spectacular-expenses-scandal-experiment. Accessed 18 February, 2016.

  • Andrejevic, Mark (2013). Infoglut. How too much information is changing the way we think and know. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, Sören, and Jens Lehmann (2010). Creating knowledge out of interlinked data. Semantic Web, vol.1, no.1-2, pp. 97-104.

  • Balsamo, Anne (2011). Designing culture: The technological imagination at work. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai (2011). The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs over Self-Interest. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance, Deen G. Freelon and Chris  Wells (2010). Changing citizen identity and the rise of a participatory media culture. In Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth, pp. 393-423.

  • Bouchart, Marianne (2012). Crowdsourcing data at the Guardian datablog, In J. Gray, L. Bounegru, & L. Chambers (eds.), Data Journalism Handbook. http://datajournalismhandbook.org/1.0/en/getting_data_5.html. accessed 1 November 2015.

  • Brabham, Daren C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, vol.8, no.3, pp. 242-262.

  • Brabham, Daren C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, Axel (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busarovs, Aleksejs (2013). Ethical aspects of crowdsourcing, or is it a modern form of exploitation. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol.1, no.1, pp. 3-14.

  • Cabiddu, Francesca, ​Manuel Castriotta, Maria C. Di Guardo, Paola Floreddu, and Daniela Pettinao (2012). Combining exploitation and exploration through crowdsourcing: The case of Starbucks. In M. De Marco, D. Te’eni, V. Albano, and S. Za (Eds.), Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering, pp. 359-366. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.

  • Castells, Manuel (2006). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.

  • CSCW (2004). ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 6-10 November 2004, Chicago, Illinois. Call for participation. http://www.acm.org/conferences/cscw2004/call_intro.html. accessed 6 November 2015.

  • Davies, Tim and Duncan Edwards (2012). Emerging implications of open and linked data for knowledge sharing in development. IDS Bulletin, vol.43, no.5, pp.117-127.

  • De Croon, Guido, Paul K. Gerke, and Ida Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper (2014, September). Crowdsourcing as a methodology to obtain large and varied robotic data sets. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference (pp. 1595-1600).

  • Deci, Edward L. and Richard M. Ryan (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum

  • Delli Carpini, Michael X. (2012). Entertainment media and the political engagement of citizens. In Semetko & Scammell (eds.) The Sage handbook of political communication. SAGE Publications.

  • Deterding, Sebastian, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9-15. New York: ACM Press.

  • Estellés-Arolas, Enrique and Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science, vol.38, no.2, pp. 189-200.

  • Flichy, Patrice (2007). The internet imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogg, B.J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology, (p. 40). ACM.

  • Frost, Chris (2014). Journalism ethics and regulation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian (2013). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvin, Jean-François (2015). When Museums of Science Create Citizen Expertise: Participatory science and the gamification of techne. THEMA. La revue des Musées de la civilisation, vol. 2, pp. 49-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony and Christopher Pierson (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens. Making sense of modernity. Standford University Press.

  • GNM press office. (2009, June 23). MPs’ expenses: The Guardian launches major crowdsourcing experiment. The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/gnm-press-office/crowdsourcing-mps-expenses. Accessed 1 November 2015.

  • Gordon, Eric, Jessica Baldwin-Philippi, and Martina Balestra (2013). Why we engage: How theories of human behavior contribute to our understanding of civic engagement in a digital era. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 21. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2343762 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2343762

  • Graybeal, Geoffrey and Amy Sindik (2012). Journalism students and civic engagement: Is there still a connection? Community Journalism, vol.1, no.1, pp. 29-46.

  • Gross, Richard, Patricia A. Curtin, and Glen T. Cameron (2001). Diversity advances both journalism, business. Newspaper Research Journal, vol.22, no.2, pp.14.

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackos, JoAnn T., and Janice Redish (1998) User and task analysis for interface design. Wiley Computer Publishing.

  • Howe, Jeff (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, vol.14, no.6, pp.1-4.

  • Howe, Jeff (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijboom, Noor and Tijs Van den Broek (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European journal of ePractice, vol.12, no.1, pp. 4-16.

  • Janssen, Marijn, Yannis Charalabidis, and Aanneke Zuiderwijk (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, vol.29, no.4, pp. 258-268.

  • Jenkins, Henry (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry and Nico Carpentier (2013). Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol.19, no.3, pp. 265-286.

  • Johnson, Jeffrey Alan (2014). From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, vol.16, no.4, pp. 263-274.

  • Kitchin, Rob (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W.E. & Law, J. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in sociotechnical change, pp. 225-258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Livingstone, Sonia (2013). The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research. The Communication Review, vol.16, no.1-2, pp. 21-30.

  • Lovink, Geert (2013). The Principle of Notworking - Concepts in Critical Internet Culture. Amsterdam: HVA Publicaties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, Lev (2001). The language of the media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Martin, Sébastien, Muriel Foulonneau, Slim Turki, and Madjid Ihadjadene (2013). Risk analysis to overcome barriers to open data. Electronic Journal of e-Government, vol.11, no.1, pp. 348-359.

  • Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor and Kenneth Cukier (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

  • McGonigal, Jane (2011). Reality is Broken. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Zizi (2015). The unbearable lightness of information and the impossible gravitas of knowledge: Big Data and the makings of a digital orality. Media, Culture & Society, vol.37, no.7, pp. 1095-1100.

  • Pariser, Eli (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carol (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, John Durham (2011). McLuhan’s grammatical theology. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol.36, pp. 227-242.

  • Pew (2008). Teens, video games, and civics - Teens’ gaming experiences are diverse and include significant social interaction and civic engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project.

  • Pew (2010). Millennials: Confident-Connected-Open to Change. Pew Research Center for the People & the Press

  • Postigo, Hector. (2003). From Pong to planet quake: Post-Industrial transitions from leisure to work. Information, Communication and Society, vol.6, no.4, pp. 593–607.

  • Przybylski, Andy K., C. Scott Rigby and Richard M. Ryan (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 154-166.

  • Putnam, Robert (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, Thorsten and Sonja Kröger (2013). Multiplayer: the social aspects of digital gaming (Vol. 3). London: Routledge.

  • Richards, Ian (2004). Stakeholders versus shareholders: Journalism, business, and ethics. Journal of mass media ethics, vol.19, no.2, pp.119-129.

  • Rieder, Bernhard and Mirko T. Schäfer (2008). Beyond engineering: Software design as bridge over the culture/technology dichotomy. In P. E. Vermaas, et al. (eds). Philosophy and Design (pp. 159-171). Houten: Springer Netherlands.

  • Rogers, Simon (2009, June 18). How to crowdsource MPs’ expenses. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/jun/18/mps-expenseshouseofcommons. accessed 1 November 2015.

  • Rosen, Jay (2006). The people formerly known as the audience. Press Think (27 June). http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html. Accessed 10 October 2015.

  • Sassen, Saskia (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, vol.50, no.3, pp. 365–388.

  • Shirky, Clay (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. Penguin Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, Clay (2010). Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. Penguin Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, Jesper, Monika Djerf-Pierre and Adam Shehata (2012). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/eds018 .

  • Turow, Joseph. (2011). The daily you: how the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Van Dijck, José (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, vol.12, no.2, pp.197-208.

  • Wershler, Darren (2012). Marshal McLuhan and the economies of knowledge. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol.37, pp. 625-636.

  • Willett, Wesley, Jeffrey Heer and Maneesh Agrawala (2012). Strategies for crowdsourcing social data analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 227-236). New York: ACM Press.

  • Williams, Raymond (Ed.) (1990). Television: Technology and Cultural Form (2nd edition.). London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Dimitri (2006). Groups and goblins: The social and civic impact of online game. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 651-670.

  • Williams, Raymond and David Edge (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 865–899.

  • Winner, Langdon (1986). Technologies as forms of life. In The Whale and the Reactor. A search for limits in an Age of High Technology. (pp. 3-18). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Zittrain, Jonathan (2009, May 6). How to get what we all want. Cato Institute (blog). Retrieved from: http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/06/jonathan-zittrain/how-get-what-we-all-want. Accessed 2 November, 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Media and Communication Studies, Karlstad University, 651 88, Karlstad, Sweden

    Reinhard A. Handler & Raul Ferrer Conill

Authors
  1. Reinhard A. Handler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raul Ferrer Conill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard A. Handler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Handler, R.A., Ferrer Conill, R. Open Data, Crowdsourcing and Game Mechanics. A case study on civic participation in the digital age . Comput Supported Coop Work 25, 153–166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-016-9250-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-016-9250-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation