Open Data, Crowdsourcing and Game Mechanics. A case study on civic participation in the digital age

Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to shed light on the dynamics of civic participation, media agency, and data practices. To do so we analyse an investigative journalism story run by The Guardian that combined open data, crowdsourcing and game mechanics with the purpose of engaging readers. The case study highlights how data can be made accessible to people who usually do not have access; how game mechanics can be deployed in order to foster civic participation by offering users a sense of autonomy, competence and relatedness; and how crowdsourcing can organise a large group of people into achieving a common goal. The combination of these three elements resulted in a case for civic participation in the digital era.

Keywords

Civic participation Civic technologies Crowdsourcing Game mechanics Open data 

References

  1. Adler, Richard P. and Judy Goggin (2005). What do we mean by ‘Civic Engagment’? Journal of Transformative Education, vol.3, no.3, pp. 236-253.Google Scholar
  2. Aitamurto, Tanja (2015). Crowdsourcing as a Knowledge-Search Method in Digital Journalism: Ruptured ideals and blended responsibility. Digital Journalism, (ahead-of-print), pp. 1-18Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, Michael. (2009). Four crowdsourcing lessons from the Guardian’s (spectacular) expenses-scandal experiment. NiemanLab, (June 23, 2009). http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/four-crowdsourcing-lessons-from-the-guardians-spectacular-expenses-scandal-experiment. Accessed 18 February, 2016.
  4. Andrejevic, Mark (2013). Infoglut. How too much information is changing the way we think and know. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Auer, Sören, and Jens Lehmann (2010). Creating knowledge out of interlinked data. Semantic Web, vol.1, no.1-2, pp. 97-104.Google Scholar
  6. Balsamo, Anne (2011). Designing culture: The technological imagination at work. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benkler, Yochai (2011). The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs over Self-Interest. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, W. Lance, Deen G. Freelon and Chris  Wells (2010). Changing citizen identity and the rise of a participatory media culture. In Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth, pp. 393-423.Google Scholar
  9. Bouchart, Marianne (2012). Crowdsourcing data at the Guardian datablog, In J. Gray, L. Bounegru, & L. Chambers (eds.), Data Journalism Handbook. http://datajournalismhandbook.org/1.0/en/getting_data_5.html. accessed 1 November 2015.
  10. Brabham, Daren C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, vol.8, no.3, pp. 242-262.Google Scholar
  11. Brabham, Daren C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bruns, Axel (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Busarovs, Aleksejs (2013). Ethical aspects of crowdsourcing, or is it a modern form of exploitation. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol.1, no.1, pp. 3-14.Google Scholar
  14. Cabiddu, Francesca, ​Manuel Castriotta, Maria C. Di Guardo, Paola Floreddu, and Daniela Pettinao (2012). Combining exploitation and exploration through crowdsourcing: The case of Starbucks. In M. De Marco, D. Te’eni, V. Albano, and S. Za (Eds.), Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering, pp. 359-366. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.Google Scholar
  15. Castells, Manuel (2006). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. CSCW (2004). ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 6-10 November 2004, Chicago, Illinois. Call for participation. http://www.acm.org/conferences/cscw2004/call_intro.html. accessed 6 November 2015.
  17. Davies, Tim and Duncan Edwards (2012). Emerging implications of open and linked data for knowledge sharing in development. IDS Bulletin, vol.43, no.5, pp.117-127.Google Scholar
  18. De Croon, Guido, Paul K. Gerke, and Ida Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper (2014, September). Crowdsourcing as a methodology to obtain large and varied robotic data sets. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference (pp. 1595-1600).Google Scholar
  19. Deci, Edward L. and Richard M. Ryan (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: PlenumGoogle Scholar
  20. Delli Carpini, Michael X. (2012). Entertainment media and the political engagement of citizens. In Semetko & Scammell (eds.) The Sage handbook of political communication. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Deterding, Sebastian, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9-15. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  22. Estellés-Arolas, Enrique and Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara (2012). Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information science, vol.38, no.2, pp. 189-200.Google Scholar
  23. Flichy, Patrice (2007). The internet imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fogg, B.J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology, (p. 40). ACM.Google Scholar
  25. Frost, Chris (2014). Journalism ethics and regulation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Fuchs, Christian (2013). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Gauvin, Jean-François (2015). When Museums of Science Create Citizen Expertise: Participatory science and the gamification of techne. THEMA. La revue des Musées de la civilisation, vol. 2, pp. 49-59.Google Scholar
  28. Giddens, Anthony and Christopher Pierson (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens. Making sense of modernity. Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. GNM press office. (2009, June 23). MPs’ expenses: The Guardian launches major crowdsourcing experiment. The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/gnm-press-office/crowdsourcing-mps-expenses. Accessed 1 November 2015.
  30. Gordon, Eric, Jessica Baldwin-Philippi, and Martina Balestra (2013). Why we engage: How theories of human behavior contribute to our understanding of civic engagement in a digital era. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 21. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2343762 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2343762
  31. Graybeal, Geoffrey and Amy Sindik (2012). Journalism students and civic engagement: Is there still a connection? Community Journalism, vol.1, no.1, pp. 29-46.Google Scholar
  32. Gross, Richard, Patricia A. Curtin, and Glen T. Cameron (2001). Diversity advances both journalism, business. Newspaper Research Journal, vol.22, no.2, pp.14.Google Scholar
  33. Habermas, Jürgen (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  34. Hackos, JoAnn T., and Janice Redish (1998) User and task analysis for interface design. Wiley Computer Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Howe, Jeff (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, vol.14, no.6, pp.1-4.Google Scholar
  36. Howe, Jeff (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  37. Huijboom, Noor and Tijs Van den Broek (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European journal of ePractice, vol.12, no.1, pp. 4-16.Google Scholar
  38. Janssen, Marijn, Yannis Charalabidis, and Aanneke Zuiderwijk (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, vol.29, no.4, pp. 258-268.Google Scholar
  39. Jenkins, Henry (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  40. Jenkins, Henry and Nico Carpentier (2013). Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol.19, no.3, pp. 265-286.Google Scholar
  41. Johnson, Jeffrey Alan (2014). From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology, vol.16, no.4, pp. 263-274.Google Scholar
  42. Kitchin, Rob (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Latour, Bruno (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker, W.E. & Law, J. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in sociotechnical change, pp. 225-258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Livingstone, Sonia (2013). The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research. The Communication Review, vol.16, no.1-2, pp. 21-30.Google Scholar
  45. Lovink, Geert (2013). The Principle of Notworking - Concepts in Critical Internet Culture. Amsterdam: HVA Publicaties.Google Scholar
  46. Manovich, Lev (2001). The language of the media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Martin, Sébastien, Muriel Foulonneau, Slim Turki, and Madjid Ihadjadene (2013). Risk analysis to overcome barriers to open data. Electronic Journal of e-Government, vol.11, no.1, pp. 348-359.Google Scholar
  48. Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor and Kenneth Cukier (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  49. McGonigal, Jane (2011). Reality is Broken. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  50. Papacharissi, Zizi (2015). The unbearable lightness of information and the impossible gravitas of knowledge: Big Data and the makings of a digital orality. Media, Culture & Society, vol.37, no.7, pp. 1095-1100.Google Scholar
  51. Pariser, Eli (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pateman, Carol (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peters, John Durham (2011). McLuhan’s grammatical theology. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol.36, pp. 227-242.Google Scholar
  54. Pew (2008). Teens, video games, and civics - Teens’ gaming experiences are diverse and include significant social interaction and civic engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  55. Pew (2010). Millennials: Confident-Connected-Open to Change. Pew Research Center for the People & the PressGoogle Scholar
  56. Postigo, Hector. (2003). From Pong to planet quake: Post-Industrial transitions from leisure to work. Information, Communication and Society, vol.6, no.4, pp. 593–607.Google Scholar
  57. Przybylski, Andy K., C. Scott Rigby and Richard M. Ryan (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 154-166.Google Scholar
  58. Putnam, Robert (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Quandt, Thorsten and Sonja Kröger (2013). Multiplayer: the social aspects of digital gaming (Vol. 3). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Richards, Ian (2004). Stakeholders versus shareholders: Journalism, business, and ethics. Journal of mass media ethics, vol.19, no.2, pp.119-129.Google Scholar
  61. Rieder, Bernhard and Mirko T. Schäfer (2008). Beyond engineering: Software design as bridge over the culture/technology dichotomy. In P. E. Vermaas, et al. (eds). Philosophy and Design (pp. 159-171). Houten: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  62. Rogers, Simon (2009, June 18). How to crowdsource MPs’ expenses. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/jun/18/mps-expenseshouseofcommons. accessed 1 November 2015.
  63. Rosen, Jay (2006). The people formerly known as the audience. Press Think (27 June). http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html. Accessed 10 October 2015.
  64. Sassen, Saskia (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, vol.50, no.3, pp. 365–388.Google Scholar
  65. Shirky, Clay (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. Penguin Press: New York.Google Scholar
  66. Shirky, Clay (2010). Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. Penguin Press: New York.Google Scholar
  67. Strömbäck, Jesper, Monika Djerf-Pierre and Adam Shehata (2012). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/eds018.
  68. Turow, Joseph. (2011). The daily you: how the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Van Dijck, José (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, vol.12, no.2, pp.197-208.Google Scholar
  70. Wershler, Darren (2012). Marshal McLuhan and the economies of knowledge. Canadian Journal of Communication, vol.37, pp. 625-636.Google Scholar
  71. Willett, Wesley, Jeffrey Heer and Maneesh Agrawala (2012). Strategies for crowdsourcing social data analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 227-236). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  72. Williams, Raymond (Ed.) (1990). Television: Technology and Cultural Form (2nd edition.). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  73. Williams, Dimitri (2006). Groups and goblins: The social and civic impact of online game. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 651-670.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, Raymond and David Edge (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 865–899.Google Scholar
  75. Winner, Langdon (1986). Technologies as forms of life. In The Whale and the Reactor. A search for limits in an Age of High Technology. (pp. 3-18). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Zittrain, Jonathan (2009, May 6). How to get what we all want. Cato Institute (blog). Retrieved from: http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/05/06/jonathan-zittrain/how-get-what-we-all-want. Accessed 2 November, 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media and Communication StudiesKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations