Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 23, Issue 4–6, pp 347–387 | Cite as

Information and Expertise Sharing in Inter-Organizational Crisis Management

  • Benedikt Ley
  • Thomas Ludwig
  • Volkmar Pipek
  • Dave Randall
  • Christian Reuter
  • Torben Wiedenhoefer
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Emergency or crisis management, as is well-attested, is a complex management problem. A variety of agencies need to collaborate and coordinate in real-time and with an urgency that is not always present in other domains. It follows that accurate information of varying kinds (e.g. geographical and weather conditions; available skills and expertises; state-of-play; current dispositions and deployments) needs to be made available in a timely fashion to the organizations and individuals who need it. By definition, this information will come from a number of sources both within and across organizations. Large-scale events in particular necessitate collaboration with other organizations. Of course, plans and processes exist to deal with such events but the number of dynamically changing factors as well as the high number of heterogeneous organizations and the high degree of interdependency involved make it impossible to plan for all contingencies. A degree of ongoing improvisation, which typically occurs by means of a variety of information and expertise sharing practices, therefore becomes necessary. This, however, faces many challenges, such as different organizational cultures, distinct individual and coordinative work practices and discrete information systems. Our work entails an examination of the practices of information and expertise sharing, and the obstacles to it, in inter-organizational crisis management. We conceive of this as a design case study, such that we examine a problem area and its scope; conduct detailed enquiries into practice in that area, and provide design recommendations for implementation and evaluation. First, we will present the results of an empirical study of collaboration practices between organizations and public authorities with security responsibilities such as the police, fire departments, public administration and electricity network operators, mainly in scenarios of medium to large power outages in Germany. Based on these results, we will describe a concept, which was designed, implemented and evaluated as a system prototype, in two iterations. While the first iteration focuses on situation assessment, the second iteration also includes inter-organizational collaboration functionalities. Based on the findings of our evaluations with practitioners, we will discuss how to support collaboration with a particular focus on information and expertise sharing.

Key words

Information management Expertise sharing Collaboration Design case study Inter-organizational crisis management CSCW 

References

  1. Ackerman, M.S., Dachtera, J., Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. (2013). Sharing Knowledge and Expertise: The CSCW View of Knowledge Management. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW), vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 531–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, M.S., Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. (2003). Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge MA, USA: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bannon, L. and Schmidt, K. (1989). CSCW: Four Characters in Search of a Context. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW). Gatwick, London, Great Britain, pp. 358–372.Google Scholar
  4. Bharosa, N., Lee, J. and Janssen, M. (2010). Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises. Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai, G. (2005). Extending Distributed GIS to Support Geo-Collaborative Crisis Management. Geographic Information Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 4–14.Google Scholar
  6. Chang, Z. and Li, S. (2007). Collaboration enabled GIS Tools for Emergency Operation Centre. In Li, J., Zlatanova, S. and Fabbri, A. (eds): Geomatics Solutions for Disaster Management. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 305–320.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, R., Sharman, R., Rao, H.R. and Upadhyaya, S.J. (2008). Coordination in Emergency Response Management. Communications of the ACM, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciborra, C. (1996). Improvisation and Information Technology in Organizations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Cleveland, USA, pp. 369–380Google Scholar
  9. Convertino, G., Mentis, H.M., Slavkovic, A., Rosson, M.B. and Carroll, J.M. (2011). Supporting common ground and awareness in emergency management planning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doherty, G., Karamanis, N. and Luz, S. (2012). Collaboration in Translation: The Impact of Increased Reach on Cross-organisational Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 525–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, USA: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrald, J.R. (2006). Agility and Discipline: Critical Success Factors for Disaster Response. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 604, no. 1, pp. 256–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–48.Google Scholar
  15. Hertzum, M., Bansler, J.P., Havn, E.C. and Simonsen, J. (2012). Pilot Implementation : Learning from Field Tests in IS Development. Communications of the AIS, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 313–328.Google Scholar
  16. Hiltz, S.R. and Turoff, M. (1985). Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 680–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hiltz, S.R., van de Walle, B. and Turoff, M. (2011). The Domain of Emergency Management Information. In Van De Walle, B., Turoff, M. and Hiltz, S.R. (eds): Information Systems for Emergency Management. New York, USA; London, Great Britain: M.E. Sharpe,, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  18. Hobson, S., Anand, R., Yang, J. and Lee, J. (2011). Towards interoperability in municipal government: a study of information sharing practices. In Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P. and Winckler, M. (eds): Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011. Springer, pp. 233–247.Google Scholar
  19. Kendra, J.M. and Wachtendorf, T. (2003). Elements of Resilience After the World Trade Center Disaster: Reconstituting New York City’s Emergency Operations Centre. Disasters, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kerr, A. (2002). A qualitative study of shift handover practice and function from a sociotechnical perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klosterman, R. (1999). The what if? Collaborative planning support system. Environment and Planning B, vol. 26, pp. 393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kraut, R., Gergle, D. and Fussell, S. (2002). The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: Informing the development of virtual co-presence. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). pp. 268–277.Google Scholar
  23. Ley, B., Pipek, V., Reuter, C. and Wiedenhoefer, T. (2012). Supporting Improvisation Work in Inter-Organizational Crisis Management. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). Austin, USA: ACM Press, pp. 1529–1538.Google Scholar
  24. Li, J. and O’Hara, K. (2009). Understanding Distributed Collaboration in Emergency Animal Disease Response. Proceedings of the Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (OZ CHI). Melbourne, Australia: ACM-Press, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, S.B. and Palen, L. (2010). The New Cartographers: Crisis Map Mashups and the Emergence of Neogeographic Practice. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ludwig, T., Reuter, C. and Pipek, V. (2013). What You See Is What I Need: Mobile Reporting Practices in Emergencies. In Bertelsen, O.W., Ciolfi, L., Grasso, A. and Papadopoulos, G.A. (eds): Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW). Paphos, Cyprus: Springer, pp. 181–206.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, D., O’Neill, J., Randall, D. and Rouncefield, M. (2007). How Can I Help You? Call Centres, Classification Work and Coordination. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mendonça, D. (2007). Decision support for improvisation in response to extreme events: Learning from the response to the 2001 World Trade Center attack. Decision Support Systems, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 952–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mendonça, D. and Wallace, W. (2007). A Cognitive Model of Improvisation in Emergency Management. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A Systems and Humans, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monares, Á., Ochoa, S.F., Pino, J.A., Herskovic, V., Rodriguez-Covili, J. and Neyem, A. (2011). Mobile computing in urban emergency situations: Improving the support to firefighters in the field. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1255–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moorman, C. and Miner, A.S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 698–723.Google Scholar
  32. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Francisco, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.MATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long range planning, vol. 33, pp. 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Normark, M. and Randall, D. (2005). Local Expertise at an Emergency Call Centre. In Gellersen, H., Schmidt, K., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. and Mackay, W. (eds): Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW). Paris, France: Springer, pp. 347–366.Google Scholar
  35. Okolloh, O. (2009). Ushahidi, or ‘testimony’: Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learning and Action, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
  36. Palen, L. and Liu, S.B. (2007). Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). San Jose, USA: ACM Press, pp. 727–736.Google Scholar
  37. Paul, S.A. and Reddy, M.C. (2010). Understanding Together: Sensemaking in Collaborative Information Seeking. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, pp. 321–330.Google Scholar
  38. Perry, L.T. (1991). Strategic improvising: How to formulate and implement competitive strategies in concert. Organization Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pettersson, M., Randall, D. and Helgeson, B.O. (2004). Ambiguities, Awareness and Economy : A Study of Emergency Service Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW), vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pina e Cunha, M., Vieira da Cunha, J. and Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational Improvisation: What, When, How and Why. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 299–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quarantelli, E.L. (1988). Disaster Crisis Management: A summary of research findings. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rabinow, P. and Marcus, G. (2008). Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary. Durham, USA: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Randall, D., Harper, R.H.R. and Rouncefield, M. (2007). Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. London, Great Britain: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rankin, A., Dahlbäck, N. and Lundberg, J. (2011). A case study of factor influencing role improvisation in crisis response teams. Cognition, Technology & Work, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reuter, C., Heger, O. and Pipek, V. (2013). Combining Real and Virtual Volunteers through Social Media. In Comes, T., Fiedrich, F., Fortier, S., Geldermann, J. and Müller, T. (eds): Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). Baden-Baden, Germany, pp. 780–790.Google Scholar
  46. Reuter, C., Ludwig, T. and Pipek, V. (2014). Ad Hoc Participation in Situation Assessment: Supporting Mobile Collaboration in Emergencies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) vol. 21, no. 4, ACM.Google Scholar
  47. Reuter, C., Marx, A. and Pipek, V. (2012). Crisis Management 2.0: Towards a Systematization of Social Software Use in Crisis Situations. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reuter, C., Pipek, V., Wiedenhoefer, T. and Ley, B. (2012). Dealing with terminologies in collaborative systems for crisis management. In Rothkrantz, L., Ristvey, J. and Franco, Z. (eds): Proceedings of the Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  49. Reuter, C. and Ritzkatis, M. (2013). Unterstützung mobiler Geo-Kollaboration zur Lageeinschätzung von Feuerwehr und Polizei. In Alt, R. and Franczyk, B. (eds): Proceedings of the International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Leipzig, Germany, pp. 1877–1891.Google Scholar
  50. Schafer, W., Ganoe, C.H. and Carroll, J.M. (2007). Supporting Community Emergency Management Planning through a Geocollaboration Software Architecture. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing (JCSCW), vol. 16, no. 4–5, pp. 501–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt, C. (2004). The Analysis of Semi-Structured Interviews. In Flick, U., v. Kardorff, E. and Steinke, I. (eds): A Companion to Qualitative Research. London, Great Britain: Sage, pp. 253–258.Google Scholar
  52. Schraagen, J.M., Huis in’t veld, M. and de Koning, L. (2010). Information Sharing During Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turoff, M., Chumer, M., van de Walle, B. and Yao, X. (2004). The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system (DERMIS). The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  54. Turoff, M., van de Walle, B. and Hiltz, S.R. (2010). Emergency Response Information Systems. Information Systems for Emergency Management, Armonk, USA: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 369–387.Google Scholar
  55. US Department of Defense (2010). Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. available at: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf.
  56. Weick, K.E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weick, K.E. (1996). Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wenger, D., Quarantelli, E.L. and Dynes, R.R. (1989). Disaster Analysis: Police and Fire Departments. University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center, available at: http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/1141Google Scholar
  59. Wu, A., Convertino, G., Ganoe, C.H., Carroll, J.M. and Zhang, X.L. (2013). Supporting collaborative sense-making in emergency management through geo-visualization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS), Elsevier, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 4–23.Google Scholar
  60. Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V. and Stevens, G. (2011). Engaging with Practices: Design Case Studies as a Research Framework in CSCW. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Hangzhou, China: ACM-Press, pp. 505–512.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedikt Ley
    • 1
  • Thomas Ludwig
    • 1
  • Volkmar Pipek
    • 1
  • Dave Randall
    • 1
  • Christian Reuter
    • 1
  • Torben Wiedenhoefer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations