Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 21–50 | Cite as

Latent Users in an Online User-Generated Content Community

  • Alcides Velasquez
  • Rick Wash
  • Cliff Lampe
  • Tor Bjornrud
Article

Abstract

Online communities depend on the persistent contributions of heterogeneous users with diverse motivations and ways of participating. As these online communities exist over time, it is possible that users change the way in which they contribute to the site. Through interviews with 31 long-term members of a user-generated content community who have decreased their participation on the site, we examined the meaning that these users gave to their contribution and how their new participation patterns related to their initial motivations. We complement the reader-to-leader framework (Preece and Shneiderman: AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 2009) by propounding the concept of latent user to understand decreasing content contribution and user life-cycles in online communities. We showed that even though latent users decrease their content contribution, their participation becomes more selective and remained consistent with initial motivations to participate.

Key words

content contribution in online communities motivations to contribute latent users online communities online participation reader-to-leader framework 

References

  1. Antin, J. (2011): My Kind of People?: Perceptions About Wikipedia Contributors and their Motivations. In CHI’ 11. Proceedings of the Conference on Human factors in Computing System, Vancouver, Canada, May 7–12, 2011. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 3411–3420.Google Scholar
  2. Baumer, E.P.S., M. Sueyoshi, and B. Tomlinson (2011): Bloggers and readers blogging together: Collaborative co-creation of political blogs Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, vol. 20, nos. 1–2, April 2011, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, S.L., A. Forte, and A. Bruckman (2005): Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia. In GROUP’05. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL. USA, October 6–9, 2005. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, M., C. Marlow, and T. Lento (2009): Feed me: Motivating Newcomer Contribution in Social Network Sites. In CHI’09. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA., USA, April 4–9, 2009. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 945–954.Google Scholar
  5. Cheshire, C. and J. Antin (2008): The social psychological effects of feedback on the production of internet information pools. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 705–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dholakia, U.M., R.P. Bagozzi, and L.K. Pearo (2004): A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heckathorn, D.D. (1997): Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joinson, A.N. (2008): Looking at, Looking up or Keeping up with People?: Motives and Use of Facebook. In CHI’08. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 1027–1036.Google Scholar
  9. King, Nigel and Christine Horrocks. (2010): Interviews in Qualitative Research. Los Angeles, C.A.: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Kollock, P. (1999): The economies of online cooperation. In M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds): Communities in cyberspace. New York, N.Y: Routledge, pp. 220–239.Google Scholar
  11. Kuzel, A.J. (1999): Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B.F. Crabtree and W.L. Miller (eds): Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE, pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
  12. Lakhani, K.R. and R.G. Wolf (2005): Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam and K.R. Lakhani (eds): Perspectives on free and open source software. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  13. Lampe, C., N. Ellison, and C. Steinfield (2006): A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. In CSCW’06. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Banff, Alberta, Canada, November 4–8, 2006. New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 167–170.Google Scholar
  14. Lampe, C. and E. Johnston (2005): Follow the (Slash) Dot: Effects of Feedback on New Members in an Online Community. In GROUP’05. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL., USA, November 6–9, 2005. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  15. Lampe, C., R. Wash, A. Velasquez, and E. Ozkaya (2010): Motivations to Contribute to Online Communities. In CHI’10. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA. USA, April 10–15, 2010. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 1927–1936.Google Scholar
  16. LaRose, R. (2010): The problem of media habits. Communication Theory, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 194–222.Google Scholar
  17. McCully, W., C. Lampe, C. Sarkar, A. Velasquez, and A. Sreenivasan (2011): Online and Offline Interactions in Online Communities. In WikiSym’11. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, Mountain View, CA, October 3–6, 2011. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
  18. Miles, M.B. and M.A. Huberman (1994): Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, C.A.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Nonnecke, B. and J. Preece (2000): Lurker Demographics: Counting the Silent. In CHI’00. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, Amsterdam. Netherlands, April 1–6, 2000. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
  20. Nov, Oded (2007).: What motivates wikipedians? Communications of the ACM, vol. 50, no. 11, November 2007, pp. 60–64.Google Scholar
  21. Onwuegbuzie, A.J. and N.L. Leech (2007): Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality and quantity, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Panciera, K. (2011): User Lifecycles in Cyclopath: A Survey of Users. In iConference’11. Proceedings of the ACM iConference, Seattle, Washington, February 8–11, 2011. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 741–742.Google Scholar
  23. Panciera, K., R. Priedhorsky, T. Erickson, and L. Terveen (2010): Lurking? Cyclopaths?: A Quantitative Lifecycle Analysis of User Behavior in a Geowiki. In CHI’ 10. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, April 10–15, 2010. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 1917–1926.Google Scholar
  24. Preece, J. and D. Maloney-Krichmar (2005): Online Communities: Design, Theory and Practice. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 10, no. 1.Google Scholar
  25. Preece, J. and B. Shneiderman (2009): The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
  26. Singh, V. (2012): Newcomer Integration and Learning in Technical Support Communities for Open Source Software. In GROUP’ 12. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL. October 27–31, 2012. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 65–74.Google Scholar
  27. Yang, H.-L. and C.-Y. Lai (2010): Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1377–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Welser, H. T., D. Cosley, G. Kossinets, A. Lin, F. Dokshin, G. Gay, and M. Smith (2011): Finding Social Roles in Wikipedia. In iConference’11. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, Seattle, Washington, February 8–11, 2011. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 122–129.Google Scholar
  29. Wilkinson, D.M. (2008): Strong Regularities in Online Peer Production. In EC’ 08. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, Chicago, Illinois, USA, July 8–12, 2008. New York, NY: ACM Press Chicago, Il, USA, pp. 302–309.Google Scholar
  30. Wohn, D.Y., A.V. Tor Bjornrud, and C. Lampe (2012): Habit as an Explanation of Participation in an Online Peer-Production Community. In CHI’12. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin TX. USA, May 5–10, 2012. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press, pp. 2905–2914.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alcides Velasquez
    • 1
  • Rick Wash
    • 2
  • Cliff Lampe
    • 3
  • Tor Bjornrud
    • 4
  1. 1.Departamento de ComunicacionPontificia Universidad JaverianaBogotaColombia
  2. 2.Department of Telecommunications, Information Studies, and MediaMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.School of InformationUniversity of Michigan, Ann ArborAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Department of Telecommunications, Information Studies, and MediaMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations