Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 91–130 | Cite as

Beyond Bandwidth: Dimensions of Connection in Interpersonal Communication



Computer-mediated communication (CMC) is a keystone of computer-supported collaborative work. Current CMC theory utilizes an information channel metaphor in which media vary according to how well they afford the transfer of messages in the channel, i.e., bandwidth. This paper draws attention to a different aspect of communication argued to be equally important: a relation between people that defines a state of communicative readiness in which fruitful communication is likely. Drawing on research on instant messaging (Nardi et al., 2000) and face to face communication (Nardi et al., 2002; Nardi and Whittaker, 2003), as well as related literature, three dimensions of connection that activate readiness are proposed: affinity, commitment, and attention. These dimensions comprise a field of connection between dyads. A field of connection is conceptualized as a labile, multidimensional space in which the values of the dimensions vary according to the history of communicative activity. Affinity, commitment, and attention are constantly monitored, negotiated, and managed through social bonding, expression of commitment, and capture of attention. The management of fields of connection requires significant interactional work to sustain communication over time.


affinity attention commitment computer-mediated communication interpersonal communication social connection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altman, I., Taylor, D 1973Social Penetration The Development of Interpersonal RelationshipsNew YorkHolt Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyle, M., Dean, J. 1965Eye-Contact Distance and AffiliationSociometry28289304Google Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. 1969Social InteractionAtherton AldineChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyle, M., Graham, J. 1977The Central Europe Experiment — looking at Persons and Looking at ThingsJournal of Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behaviour1616Google Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R., Leary, M. 1995The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human MotivationPsychological Bulletin3497529Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, S., Henzi, T., Weingrill, J., Lycett, L., Hill, R. 2000Female Baboons Do Not Raise the Stakes But They Give as Good as They GetAnimal Behaviour59763770Google Scholar
  7. Begole, J., Tang, J., Smith, R., Yankelovich, N. 2002Work rhythms: Analyzing Visualization of Awareness Histories of Distributed Groups. CSCW 2002New OrleansLAGoogle Scholar
  8. Berk, L., Tan, S., Fry, W. 1989Neuroendocrine and Stress Hormone Changes during Mirthfull LaughterAmerican Journal Medical Science298390396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., Wright, Z. 2002Effects of Four Computer-Mediated Communications Channels on Trust DevelopmentACM PressNew York135139Proceedings CHI2002Google Scholar
  10. Bly, S. 1988A Use of Drawing Surfaces in Collaborative SettingsACM PressNew York250256In Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative WorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Bly, S., Harrison, S., Irwin, S. 1993Media Spaces: Bringing People Together in a Video, Audio and Computing EnvironmentCommunications of the ACM362845Google Scholar
  12. Bradner, E., W. Kellogg and T. Erickson, (1999): The Adoption and Use of BABBLE. Proceedings ECSCW’99, European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 139–158.Google Scholar
  13. Braithwaite, D., Waldron, V., Finn, J. 1999Communication of Social Support in Computer-mediated Groups for People with DisabilitiesHealth Communication11123151Google Scholar
  14. Carpenter, C. 1942Sexual Behaviour of Free-Ranging Rhesus Monkeys, Macaca mulattaJournal of Comparative Psychology33113162Google Scholar
  15. Clark, H. 1992Arenas of Language UseChicagoUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Churchill, E., Bly, S. 2000Culture vultures: Considering Culture and Communication in Virtual EnvironmentsSIGGroup Bulletin21611New York ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Culnan, M., Markus, M. 1987

    Information Technologies

    Jablin, F.Putman, L.Roberts, K.Porter, L. eds. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary PerspectiveThousand OaksSage
    Google Scholar
  18. Daft, R., Lengel, R. 1984

    Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design

    Straw, B.Cummings, L. eds. Research in Organizational BehaviourJAI PressGreenwich CT
    Google Scholar
  19. Dourish, P. and V. Bellotti, (1992): Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW’92. New York: ACM Press, pp. 107–114.Google Scholar
  20. Dourish, P. and S. Bly, (1993): Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group. Proceedings of CHI’93 Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 541–547.Google Scholar
  21. Dourish, P. 2001Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied InteractionMIT PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekman, P. 1982Emotion in the Human FaceCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Finn, K., Sellen, A., Wilbur, S. 1997Video-mediated CommunicationMahwah NJLawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  24. Fish, R., R. Kraut, R. Rootand and R. Rice, (1992): Evaluating Video as a Technology for Informal Communication, In Proceedings of CHI’92 Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
  25. Fussell, S. (2002): An Alternative Conceptualization of the Benefits of Bandwidth. Paper presented at Beyond Face to Face Workshop, Computer-supported Collaborative Work Conference, New Orleans, 2002.Google Scholar
  26. Garfinkel, H. 1967Studies in EthnomethodologyNew YorkPrentice HallGoogle Scholar
  27. Grinter, B. and M. Eldrige, (2003): Wan2tlk?: Everyday Text Messaging. Proceedings CHI2003. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, pp. 441–448.Google Scholar
  28. Grinter, R. and L. Palen, (2002): Instant Messaging in Teen Life. Proceedings CSCW 2002. New Orleans, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
  29. Gutwin, C. and S. Greenberg, (1998): Effects of Awareness Support on Group Usability. Proceedings CHI’98. Los Angeles, CA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 511–518.Google Scholar
  30. Handel, M. and J. Herbsleb, (2002): What is Chat doing in the Workplace? Proceedings CSCW 2002. New Orleans, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  31. Harlow, H., Harlow, M. 1962Social Deprivation in MonkeysScientific American207136146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heath, C. and P. Luff, (1991): Disembodied Conduct: Communication through Video in a Multimedia Environment. In Proceedings of CHI’91 Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 99–103.Google Scholar
  33. Heath, C., Luff, P. 1992Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control RoomsComputer Supported Cooperative Work.16994Google Scholar
  34. Herbsleb, J., A. Mockus, T. Finholt and R. Grinter, (2000): Distance, Dependencies and Delay in a Global Collaboration. Proceedings Computer-supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 319–328.Google Scholar
  35. Hobbs, J. (1980): Interactive Discourse: Influence of the Social Context. Proceedings 18th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, June 19–22. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  36. Hudson, J., J. Christensen, W. Kellogg and T. Erickson, (2002): “I’d be Overwhelmed, but it’s Just One More Thing To Do”: Availability and Interruption in Research Management. Proceedings CHI2002. New York: ACM Press, pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
  37. Iacono, S. and S. Weisband, (1997): Developing Trust in Virtual Teams. In Proceedings 30th HICSS Conference. pp. 412–420.Google Scholar
  38. Ito, M. (2001): Mobile Phones, Japanese Youth, and the Re-placement of Social Contact. Proc. Annual Meeting for the Society for the Social Studies of Science. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Kahneman, D. 1973Attention and EffortNew JerseyPrentice HallGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaptelinin, V. 1996

    Activity Theory: Implications for Human-Computer Interaction.

    Nardi, B. eds. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer InteractionCambridgeMIT Press103116
    Google Scholar
  41. Karttunen, L., Peters, S. 1975Conventional Implicature of Montague GrammarBerkeley Linguistic Society1266278Google Scholar
  42. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., McGuire, T. 1984Social Psychological Effects of Computer-mediated CommunicationAmerican Psychologist.3911231134Google Scholar
  43. Kleinke, C., Pohlen, P. 1971Affective and Emotional Responses as a Function of Other Person’s Gaze and Cooperativeness in a Two-Person GameJournal of Personal Social Psychology7308313Google Scholar
  44. Kraut, R., Fish, R., Root, R., Chalfonte, B. 1990

    Informal Communication in Organizations.

    Spacapan, S.Oskamp, S. eds. People’s Reactions to Technology in Factories Offices and AerospaceSageNew York
    Google Scholar
  45. Kraut, R., Gergle, D., Fussell, S. 2002The Use of Visual Information in Shared Visual Spaces: Informing the Development of Virtual Co-presence. Proceedings Computer- supported collaborative workACM PressNew York: New Orleans, LA3140Google Scholar
  46. Kraut, R., M. Miller and J. Siegel, (1996): Communication in Performance of Physical Tasks: Effects on Outcomes and Performance. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
  47. Lenhart, A., L. Rainie and O. Lewis, (2001): Teenage Life Online: The Rise of the Instant Message Generation and the Internet’s Impact on Friendships and Family Relationships. Pew Internet and American Life Project. June 20, 2001. Scholar
  48. Mantei, M., R. Baecker, A. Sellen, W. Buxton, T. Milligan and B. Wellman, (1991): Experiences in the Use of a Media Space. In Proceedings of CHI’91 Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM Press, pp. 203–209.Google Scholar
  49. Mark, G. (2001): Extreme Collaboration. Communications of the ACM, December 2001.Google Scholar
  50. Milewski, A. and T. Smith, (2000): Providing Presence Cues to Telephone Users. Proceedings CSCW 2000, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
  51. Moran, T., W. van Melle and P. Chiu (1998): Tailorable Domain Objects as Meeting Tools for an Electronic Whiteboard. Proceedings CSCW’98 Conference. New York: ACM Press, pp. 295–304.Google Scholar
  52. Morley, I., Stephenson, G. 1969Interpersonal and Interparty Exchange. A Laboratory Simulation of an Industrial Negotiation at the Plant Level.British Journal of Psychology60543545Google Scholar
  53. Morley, I., Stephenson, G. 1970Formality in Experimental Negotiations: A Validation StudyBritish Journal of Psychology61383384Google Scholar
  54. Mynatt, E., T. Igarashi, W. Edwards and A. LaMarca (1999): Flatland: New Dimensions in Office Whiteboards. Proceedings CHI’99. New York: ACM Press, pp. 346–353.Google Scholar
  55. Nardi, B., Kuchinsky, A., Whittaker, S., Leichner, R., Schwarz, H. 1996Video-as-data: Technical and Social Aspects of a Collaborative Multimedia ApplicationThe Journal of Computer-supported Cooperative Work4, 173100Google Scholar
  56. Nardi, B. 1998Introduction to A Web on the Wind: The Structure of Invisible WorkA Special Issue of Computer-supported Cooperative Work812Google Scholar
  57. Nardi, B., S. Whittaker, and E. Bradner (2000): Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. Proceedings CSCW 2000, pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
  58. Nardi, B. and S. Whittaker (2002): The Place of Face to Face Communication in Distributed Work. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds): Distributed Work. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., Schwarz, H. 2002NetWORKers and their Activity in Intentional NetworksThe Journal of Computer-supported Cooperative Work11205242Google Scholar
  60. Nardi, B. (n.d.): Cultures of connection: Network engineers and the Internet. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
  61. Nichols, K., Champness, B. 1971Eye Gaze and GSRJournal of Experimental Social Psychology7623626Google Scholar
  62. Olson, G., Olson, J. 2000Distance MattersHuman–computer Interaction15139179Google Scholar
  63. Olson, J., S. Teasley, L. Covi and G. Olson (2002): The (currently) Unique Advantages of Collocated Work. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler, (eds): Distributed Work. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 113–135.Google Scholar
  64. Parr, L., Matheson, M., Bernstein, I., de Waal, F. 1997Grooming Down the Hierarchy: Allogrooming in Captive Brown Capuchin Monkeys, Cebus appellaAnimal Behavior54361367Google Scholar
  65. Rutter, M. 1987Communicating by TelephoneOxfordPergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G. 1978A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for ConversationLanguage50696735Google Scholar
  67. Sacks, H. (1992): In G. Jefferson (ed.): Lectures on Conversation. Vols. I & II, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. Sarbaugh-Thompson, M., Feldman, M. 1998Electronic Mail and Organizational Communication: Does Saying “Hi” Really MatterOrganizational Science9685698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwarz, H., B. Nardi and S. Whittaker (1999): The Hidden Work in Virtual Work. Proceedings Critical Management Conference, Manchester, July 1999.Google Scholar
  70. Schiano, D., S. Ehrlich and K. Sheridan (2001): Categorical Perception of Facial Affect: An Illusion. Extended Abstracts of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. NY: ACM, pp. 299–300.Google Scholar
  71. Schiano, D., C. Chen, J. Ginsberg, U. Gretarsdottir, M. Huddleston and E. Isaacs (2002): Teen Use of Messaging Media. Extended Abstracts of ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. NY: ACM, (pp. 594–595).Google Scholar
  72. Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B. 1976The Social Psychology of TelecommunicationsLondonWiley PressGoogle Scholar
  73. Sproul, L., Kiesler, S. 1986Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational CommunicationManagement Science3214921512Google Scholar
  74. Stalnaker, R. (1978): Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.): Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 315–332.Google Scholar
  75. Tang, J., E. Isaacs and M. Rua (1994): Supporting Distributed Groups with a Montage of Lightweight Interactions. In Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work, New York: ACM Press, pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
  76. Tang, J. and M. Rua (1994): Montage: Providing Teleproximity for Distributed Groups. In Proceedings of CHI’94 Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
  77. Tang, J., N. Yankelovich, J. Begole, M. Van Kleek, F. Li and J. Bhalodia (2001): CoNexus to Awarenex. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer–Human Interaction (CHI) 2001, March 31–April 5, 2001, Seattle, WA, ACM Press, NY, pp. 221–228.Google Scholar
  78. Tomlinson, W. (2002): Synthetic Social Relationships for Computational Entities. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  79. Trevino, L., Lengel, R., Daft, R. 1987Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in OrganizationsCommunication Research14553574Google Scholar
  80. Vertegaal, R. and Y. Ding, (2002): Explaining Effects of Eye Gaze on Mediated Group Conversations: Amount or Synchronization? In Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 41–48.Google Scholar
  81. Voida, A., W. Newstetter, and E. Mynatt (2002): When Conventions Collide: the Tensions of Instant Messaging Attributed. Proceedings CHI2002. New York: ACM Press, pp. 187–192.Google Scholar
  82. Walther, J. 1992Interpersonal Effects in Computer-mediated Communication: A Relational PerspectiveCommunication Research195290Google Scholar
  83. Walther, J., Burgoon, J. 1992Relational Communication in Computer-mediated InteractionHuman Communication Research,195988Google Scholar
  84. Walther, J. (2002): Time Effects in Computer-mediated Groups. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds): Distributed Work. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 235–257.Google Scholar
  85. Walther, J. and M. Parks (2002): Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered in: Computer-mediated Communication and Relationships. In M. Knapp, J. Daly and G. Miller, (eds.): The Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (3rd ed.): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  86. Weisband, S. (2002): Maintaining Awareness in Distributed Team Collaboration: Implications for Leadership and Performance. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds.): Distributed Work. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 312–333.Google Scholar
  87. Whittaker, S. 1995Rethinking Video as a Technology for Interpersonal CommunicationInternational Journal of Human Computer Studies42501529Google Scholar
  88. Whittaker, S. 2003

    Theories and Methods in Mediated Communication.

    Graesser, A. eds. The Handbook of Discourse ProcessesLawrence ErlbaumCambridge: Hillsdale NJ
    Google Scholar
  89. Whittaker, S., D. Frohlich and W. Daly-Jones (1994): Informal Workplace Communication: What is it Like and How Might We Support It? Proceedings of CHI’94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 131–137.Google Scholar
  90. Whittaker, S., Geelhoed, E., Robinson, E. 1993Shared Workspaces: How do they Work and When are they Useful?International Journal of Man-Machine Studies39813842Google Scholar
  91. Williams, E. 1977Experimental Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Mediated CommunicationPsychological Bulletin16963976Google Scholar
  92. Zheng, J., Veinott, E., Bos, N., Olson, J., Olson, G. 2002Trust Without Touch: Jumpstarting Long-distance Trust with Initial Social ActivitiesACM PressNew York141146Proceedings CHI2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irvine School of Inf.+ Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations