Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 13, Issue 3–4, pp 305–327 | Cite as

Building Connections among Loosely Coupled Groups: Hebb’s Rule at Work

Article

Abstract

Awareness of others’ interests can lead to fruitful collaborations, friendships and positive social change. Interviews of groups involved in both research and corporate work revealed a lack of awareness of shared interests among workers sharing an organizational affiliation and collocated in the same building or complex but still physically separated (e.g., by walls or floors). Our study showed that loosely coupled groups were less likely to discover shared interests in the way that many tightly collocated groups do, such as by overhearing conversations or noticing paraphernalia. Based on these findings we iteratively developed a system to capture and display shared interests. Our platform includes an e-mail sensor to discover personal interests, a search algorithm to determine shared interests, a public peripheral display and lightweight location-tracking system to convey those interests. We deployed the system to two groups for two months and found that the system did lead to increased awareness of shared interests.

Keywords

CSCW social computing peripheral displays sensors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellotti, V. and S. Bly (1996): Walking Away from the Desktop Computer: Distributed Collaboration and Mobility in a Product Design Team. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW’96 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. pp. 209–218.Google Scholar
  2. Borgatti, S., M. Everett and L. Freeman (2002): Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, H.H. 1996Using LanguageCambridge University PressCambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  4. de Bruijn, O. and R. Spence (2001): Serendipity within a Ubiquitous Computing Environment: A Case for Opportunistic Browsing. In Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing, Third International Conference, vol. 2201 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 362–369.Google Scholar
  5. Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., Henderson, A. 1996Your Place or Mine? Learning from Long-Term Use of Audio-Video CommunicationComputer Supported Cooperative Work53362Google Scholar
  6. Dourish, P. and S. Bly (1992): Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group. In Proceedings of ACM CHI’92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 541–547.Google Scholar
  7. Garton, L., C. Haythornthwaite and B. Wellman (1997): Studying On-Line Social Networks. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication vol. 3, no. 1.Google Scholar
  8. Greenberg, S. (1996): Peepholes: Low Cost Awareness of One’s Community. In Extended abstracts of ACM CHI ’96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 206–207.Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg, S. and M. Rounding (2001): The Notification Collage: Posting Information to Public and Personal Displays. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 514–521.Google Scholar
  10. Grice, H. (1975): Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.): Syntax and semantics, vol. 3. Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
  11. Haythornthwaite, C. (1999): A Social Network Theory of Tie Strength and Media Use: A Framework for Evaluating Multi-level Impacts of New Media. Technical report, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  12. Hebb, D.O. 1949The Organization of Behavior: A neuropsychological theoryWileyNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, E.M., J. Tuillo, T.J. Costa, and J.F. McCarthy (2002): Promoting Awareness of Work Activities Through Peripheral Displays. In Extended Abstracts of ACM CHI’02 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 648–649.Google Scholar
  14. McArthur, R. and P. Bruza (2003): Discovery of Implicit and Explicit Connections Between People Using Email Utterance. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
  15. McCarthy, J.F., T.J. Costa and E.S. Liongosari (2001): UniCast, OutCast & GroupCast: Three Steps Toward Ubiquitous, Peripheral Displays. In Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing, Third International Conference, vol. 2201 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 332–345.Google Scholar
  16. Monk, A. (2003): Common Ground in Electronically Mediated Communication: Clark’s Theory of Language Use. In J. Carroll (ed.): HCI models, theories and frameworks: towards a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 265–289.Google Scholar
  17. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., Isaacs, E., Creech, M., Johnson, J., Hainsworth, J. 2002Integrating communication and information through ContactMapCommunications of the ACM458995Google Scholar
  18. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. 1945The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of InnovationOxford PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Okamoto, M., Isbister, K., Nakanishi, H., Ishida, T. 2002Supporting Cross-Cultural Communication with a Large-Screen SystemNew Generation Computing20165185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson, G.M. (2003): Tutorial on the Evaluation of CSCW Systems. Presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.Google Scholar
  21. Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S. 2000Distance MattersHuman–Computer Interaction15139178Google Scholar
  22. Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S., Carter, M.R., Storrosten, M. 1992Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of CollaborationHuman-Computer Interaction7347374Google Scholar
  23. Olson, J.S., G.M. Olson and D.K. Meader (1995): What Mix of Video and Audio is Useful for Small Groups Doing Remote Real-Time Design Work?. In Proceedings of ACM CHI’95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 362–368.Google Scholar
  24. Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M., Storrosten, M., Carter, M. 1993Groupwork Close Up: A Comparison of the Group Design Process With and Without a Simple Group EditorACM Transactions on Information Systems14321348Special Issue on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)Google Scholar
  25. Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R.J.S. 2003Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasksHuman-Computer Interaction181318Google Scholar
  26. Sack, W. (2000): Conversation Map: A Content-Based Usenet Newsgroup Browser. In Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. pp. 233–240.Google Scholar
  27. Salton, G. 1988Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by ComputerAddison-WesleyReading MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz, M., Wood, D. 1992Discovering Shared Interests Among People Using Graph Analysis of Global Electronic Mail TrafficCommunications of the ACM367889Google Scholar
  29. Snowdon, D. and A. Grasso (2002): Diffusing information in organizational settings: learning from experience. In Proceedings of ACM CHI’02 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 331–338.Google Scholar
  30. Tyler, J., D. Wilkinson and B.A. Huberman (2003): Email as Spectroscopy: Automated Discovery of Community Structure within Organizations. In Proceedings of International Conference on Communities and Technologies.Google Scholar
  31. Wasserman, S., Faust, K. 1994Social Network Analysis: Methods and ApplicationsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Whittaker, S., D. Frohlich and O. Daly-Jones (1994): Informal Workplace Communication: What is It Like and How Might We Support It?. In Proceedings of ACM CHI’94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 131–137.Google Scholar
  33. Yantis, S. 1993Stimulus-Driven Attentional CaptureCurrent Directions in Psychological Science2156161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical Engineering and Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations