Abstract
Each and every reform in countries of Eastern Europe and South East Europe, as well as in Russia and Central Asia, was and has to be executed within an area of tension of three dimensions – the socialist path of dependency, the growing national identity and the international influence. Starting with the socialist path, apart from the substantial law, which mostly involved special legal acts, one has to consider the institutional setting of functions, relevant within the consumer protection. These settings had and have influence on the design and implementation of consumer protection in former socialist systems. With regard to national identity, at least within the legal community, there was a tendency to establish its own basic laws, e.g., civil codes. In order to embed consumer protection in these legal settings, it was necessary that new civil codes provide the framework for contractual relations in general. This includes fighting with new national pride for their own system and a desire to protect their own traditions, where consumer protection is partly seen as an intervention in the freedom of contract. Finally, international influence is visible in all Eastern countries. The 1990s combined competition between common law and continental law but also included considerable dependency on international experts. Hence, they act more as consultancies rather than being driven by enthusiasm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Change history
19 February 2020
The original version of this article unfortunately contains incorrect author name.
Notes
See, e.g., Art. 64 of the PCA with Armenia of 1999. Same wording can be found in the PCAs with Georgia (1999), Azerbaijan (1999), Ukraine (1998), Moldova (1994), Kirgizstan (1999), Uzbekistan (1999), Turkmenistan (1998) and Tajikistan (2010). In Russia (1997), it is not called “aimed” but “with a view.”
References
Askland, A (1987). The civil codes of the Soviet Republics by Ye A. Fleishits and L. Makovsky. Maryland Journal of International Law, 3(2), 450–453.
Boguslawsky, M. & Knieper, R. (1998). Wege zu neuem Recht (Ways to new Law). Berlin.
Cherstobitov, A. (2001). Problems of consumer protection in Russia. Juridica International, VI(2001), 53–57.
Gray, W. & Stults, R (2019). Civil Code of the Russian Federated Socialist Republic: An English translation.
Knieper, R. (2006). Rechtsreformen entlang der Seidenstraße. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts Verlag.
Knieper, R., Chanturia, L. & Schramm, H.J. (2010). Das Privatrecht im Kaukasus und in Zentralasien. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.
Meyer, T. (2010). Social market economy values in legal reform projects. In C. Jessel-Holst, R. Kulms, & A. Trunk (Eds.), Private Law in Eastern Europe (pp. 41–62). Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen.
Nehf, J. P. (1993). Empowering the Russian consumer in a market economy. Michigan Journal of International Law, 14(4), 739–826.
Vasiljevic, M., Kulms, R., Josipovic, T. & Stanivukovic, M. (2010). Private law reform in South East Europe. Belgrade: Liber Amicorum Christa Jessel-Host (Faculty of Law University of Belgrade).
Legislation
European Union
Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part OJ L 261, 30.8.2014, p. 4–743
Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part OJ L 161, 29.5.2014, p. 3–2137
Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part OJ L 260, 30.8.2014, p. 4–738
Joint Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part OJ L 23, 26.1.2018, p. 4–466
Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part OJ L 164, 30.6.2015, p. 2–547
Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo* , of the other part OJ L 71, 16.3.2016, p. 3–321
Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Montenegro, of the other part OJ L 108, 29.4.2010, p. 3–354
Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part OJ L 278, 18.10.2013, p. 16–473
Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part OJ L 84, 20.3.2004, p. 13–197
Yugoslavia
Law on Contracts and Torts Official Gazette of the SFR od Yugoslavia (Službeni list SFRJ) nr. 29/1978
Georgia
Civil Code of Georgia Parliamentary Gazette, 31, 24/07/1997
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: The original version of this article unfortunately contains incorrect author name.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meyer, T. Apples and Peaches—Consumer Protection Goes East. J Consum Policy 43, 77–87 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09432-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09432-1