This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
See, e.g., Council Directive of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays, and package tours (90/314/EEC) OJ L 158/59 (Package Travel Directive) or Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts OJ L 144/19 (Distance Selling Directive).
Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market OJ L 149/22 (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive).
See, e.g., CJEU, case C-210/96 (Gut Springenheide) ECLI:EU:C:1998:369 para 37.
CJEU has started to apply the benchmark of an average consumer in cases assessing fairness of standard terms and conditions. See, e.g., CJEU, case C-26/13 (Kásler) ECLI:EU:C:2014:282.
For a more extensive account of the information paradigm in European law and its behavioural turn, see Franck and Purnhagen (2013).
Council Directive of 20 Dececmber 1985 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises (85/577/EEC) OJ L 372/31 (Doorstep Selling Directive).
Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights OJ L 304/64 (Consumer Rights Directive).
Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers OJ L 133/66 (Consumer Credit Directive).
See, e.g., Regulation 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers OJ L 304/18.
We are focusing in this paper on the function of information obligations as a consumer protection mechanism rather than a purported silver bullet against market failures and a mechanism, which assigns information responsibilities and analytical competences to different stakeholders (for further reading on this point, see Franck and Purnhagen 2013).
Alemanno, A. (2015). What can EU health law learn from behavioural sciences? The case of EU lifestyle regulation. In A. Alemanno & A.-L. Sibony (Eds.), Nudge and the law: A European perspective (pp. 235–254). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Ayres, I., & Schwartz, A. (2014). The no-reading problem in consumer contract law. Stanford Law Review, 66, 545–610.
Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F., & Trossen, D. R. (2014). Does anyone read the fine print? Consumer attention to standard-form contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies, 43(1), 1–35.
Bar-Gill, O., & Board, O. (2012). Product-use information and the limits of voluntary disclosure. American Law and Economics Review, 14(1), 235–270.
Bar-Gill, O., Schkade, D., & Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Drawing false inferences from mandated disclosures (Harvard Public Law Working Paper No.17-06). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2914354.
Bateman, J. A. (2017). Multimodality and genre. Issues for information design. In A. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information design: research and practice (pp. 204–225). London: Routledge.
Ben-Shahar, O., & Chilton, A. (2016). Simplification of privacy disclosures: An experimental test. The Journal of Legal Studies, 45(2), 41–67.
Ben-Shahar, O., & Schneider, C. E. (2014a). More than you wanted to know: The failure of mandated disclosure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ben-Shahar, O., & Schneider, C. E. (2014b). The futility of cost benefit analysis in financial disclosure regulation (Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Working Paper No. 68). Retrieved from http://repository.law.umich.edu/law_econ_current/100.
Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2011). Information disclosure, cognitive biases, and payday borrowing. The Journal of Finance, 66(6), 1865–1893.
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Interview. In T. Theo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1008–1010). New York: Springer.
Bucher, H. J., & Niemann, P. (2012). Visualizing science: The reception of PowerPoint presentations. Visual Communication, 11(3), 283–306.
Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services. (2016). Evaluation of the Consumer Rights Directive (2011/83/EU). Information requirements—emerging findings. Presentation during the European Consumer Summit, 17th October 2016. Retrieved from https://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiy7LLJnKfVAhUNKlAKHRrCBw0QFggoMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fnewsroom%2Fjust%2Fdocument.cfm%3Faction%3Ddisplay%26doc_id%3D18574&usg=AFQjCNHPB3SB-WRQNo0PYL1PWrYb5670og.
CHAFEA. (2014). Impact of information on patients’ choice within the context of the Directive 2011/24/EU on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Final report. European Commission: Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/health/cross_border_care/docs/cbhc_information_patientschoice_en.pdf.
Chater, N., Huck, S., & Inderst, R. (2010). Consumer decision-making in retail investment services: A behavioural economics perspective. Final Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/archive/strategy/docs/final_report_en.pdf.
Djonov, E. (2005). Analysing the organisation of information in websites: From hypermedia design to systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis (Doctoral dissertation, The University of New South Wales Australia). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Emilia_Djonov/publication/265203737_Analysing_the_organisation_of_information_in_Websites_From_hypermedia_design_to_systemic_functional_hypermedia_discourse_analysis/links/57174ba308aeb56278c32074/Analysing-the-organisation-of-information-in-Websites-From-hypermedia-design-to-systemic-functional-hypermedia-discourse-analysis.pdf.
Djonov, E. (2007). Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: A systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective. Information Design Journal, 15(2), 144–162.
Domurath, I. (2017). Consumer vulnerability and welfare in mortgage contracts. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Duivenvoorde, B. (2015). The consumer benchmarks in the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. Berlin: Springer.
EATWELL. (2013). Effectiveness of policy interventions to promote healthy eating and recommendations for future action: Evidence from EATWELL Project. Deliverable 5.1. Retrieved from http://eatwellproject.eu/en/upload/Reports/Deliverable%205_1.pdf.
Edinger, W. H. (2016). Promoting educated consumer choices. Has EU food information legislation finally matured? Journal of Consumer Policy, 39(1), 9–22.
Elshout, M., Elsen, M., Leenheer, J., Loos, M., & Luzak, J. (2016). Study on consumers’ attitudes towards Terms and Conditions (T&Cs). Final report. European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer_evidence/behavioural_research/consumers_attitudes_terms_conditions/index_en.htm.
EEC. (1975). Preliminary programme of the European Economic Community for consumer information and protection, OJ  C 92/2. Brussels: European Economic Community.
European Commission. (2016). Consumer vulnerability across key markets in the European Union. Final report. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d1af2b47-9a83-11e6-9bca-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
European Commission. (2017a). Commission Work Programme 2018. An agenda for a united, stronger and more democratic Europe. COM(2017) 650 final.
European Commission. (2017b). Commission staff working document. Evaluation of the Consumer Rights Directive. SWD (2017) 169 final.
Faure, M., & Luth, H. (2011). Behavioural economics in unfair contract terms. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 337–358.
Faust, F. (2016). Gutachten: Digitale Wirtschaft—analoges Recht: Braucht das BGB ein Update?. In Deutscher Juristentag, Verhandlungen des 71. Deutschen Juristentages (pp. 805–816). Essen: Beck.
Fowler, R. (1985). Power. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 61–82). London: Academic Press.
Fowler, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Critical linguistics. In R. Fowler et al. (Eds.), Language and control (pp. 185–213). London: Routledge.
Franck, J., & Purnhagen, K. (2013). Homo economicus, behavioural sciences, and economic regulation: On the concept of man in the internal market regulation and its normative basis. In K. Mathis (Ed.), Law and economics in Europe: Foundations and applications (pp. 329–365). Berlin: Springer.
Franken, S. M. (2009). The political economy of the EC consumer credit directive. In J. Niemi, J. Ramsay, & W. Whitford (Eds.), Consumer credit, debt and bankruptcy: Comparative and international perspectives (pp. 129–152). London: Hart.
Furnell, S., & Phippen, A. (2012). Online privacy: A matter of policy? Computer Fraud & Security (August 2012), 12–19.
Gallup Consortium. (2013). Testing of a standardized information notice for consumers on the Common European Sales Law. Final report. European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/contract/files/common_sales_law/cesl_gallup_consortium_final_report_en.pdf.
Garcia Porras, C., & van Boom, W. (2012). Information disclosure in the EU Consumer Credit Directive: Opportunities and limitations. In J. Devenney & M. Kenny (Eds.), Consumer credit, debt, and investment in Europe (pp. 21–55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, P., & Basye, D. (2014). Personalized learning: A guide for engaging students with technology. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Grundmann, S. (2002). Information, party autonomy and economic agents in European contract law. Common Market Law Review, 39, 269–293.
Grundmann, S. (2013). The EU Consumer Rights Directive: Optimizing, creating alternatives, or a dead end? Uniform Law Review, 18(1), 98–127.
Grynbaum, L. (2010). Pre-contractual information duties: The foreseeable failure of full harmonization. In H. Schulte-Nölke & L. Tichý (Eds.), Perspectives for European consumer law (pp. 7–12). Munich: Sellier.
Harridge-March, S. (2006). Can the building of trust overcome consumer perceived risk online? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(7), 746–761.
Heinzle, S. L., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2012). Dynamic adjustment of eco-labelling schemes and consumer choice—the revision of EU energy label as a missed opportunity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 60–70.
Helberger, N. (2011). Diversity label: Exploring the potential and limits of a transparency approach to media diversity. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 337–369.
Helberger, N. (2013). Forms matter: Informing consumers effectively. BEUC: The European Consumer Organization. Retrieved from http://www.beuc.eu/publications/x2013_089_upa_form_matters_september_2013.pdf.
Helleringer, G., & Sibony, A. (2017). European consumer protection through the behavioural lens. Columbia Journal of European Law, 23(3), 607–646.
Helleringer, G. (2016). Trust me, I have a conflict of interest! Testing the efficacy of disclosure in retail investment advice. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14/2016. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2755734.
Henning, P. A., Heberle, F., Streicher, A., Zielinski, A., Swertz, C., Bock, J., & Zander, S. (2014, July). Personalized web learning: Merging open educational resources into adaptive courses for higher education. UMAP Workshops. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/95402195.pdf#page=57.
Himmelsbach, E., Allen, A., & Francas, M. (2014). Study on the impact of food information on consumers’ decision making. Final report. European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/docs/labelling_legislation_study_food-info-vs-cons-decision_2014.pdf.
Hirschprung, R., Toch, E., Bolton, F., & Maimon, O. (2016). A methodology for estimating the value of privacy in information disclosure systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 443–453.
Hogarth, J., & Merry, E. (2011). Designing disclosures to inform consumer financial decisionmaking: Lessons learned from consumer testing. Federal Reserve Bulletin, August 2011. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedgrb/y2011iaugustnv.97.html.
Holsanova, J. (2012). New methods for studying visual communication and multimodal integration. Visual Communication, 11, 251–257.
Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215–1226.
Homburg, C., & Stebel, P. (2008). Determinants of contract terms for professional services. Management Accounting Research, 20, 129–145.
Howells, G. (2005). The potential and limits of consumer empowerment by information. Journal of Law and Society, 32(3), 349–370.
Jansen, K. (Ed.). (2002). The handbook of media and communication research. London: Routledge.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178.
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31.
Kress, G. (1985). Ideological structures in discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 4, pp. 27–42). London: Academic Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kroes, N. (2012, Jan 12). Making online transactions easier, more trustworthy and more transparent. Remarks at a press conference on eCommerce Action Plan Communication. Brussels: European Commission.
Lacko, J., & Pappalardo, J. (2010). The failure and promise of mandated consumer mortgage disclosures: Evidence from qualitative interviews and a controlled experiment with mortgage borrowers. The American Economic Review, 100(2), 516–521.
Leenheer, J., Elsen, M., Mikola, N., van der Wagt, M., & Lloyd, L. (2014). Study on the effects on consumer behaviour of online sustainability information displays. Final report. European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/effects-consumer-behaviour-online-sustainability-information-displays-study-report.
Lee, T., Yun, T., & Haley, E. (2017). What you think you know: The effects of prior financial education and readability on financial disclosure processing. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 18(2), 125–142.
Lemke, J. L. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.
Lewis, J. (1991). The ideological octopus: An exploration of television and its audience. London: Routledge.
Linos, K., & Carlson, M. (2017). Qualitative methods for law review writing. The University of Chicago Law Review, 84, 213–238.
Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14.
Loos, M. (2014). Consumer sales in the Netherlands after implementation of the Consumer Rights Directive and with a view to the future Common European Sales Law (Centre for the European Study of Contract Law, Working Paper No. 2014–12.) Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2506048.
Loewenstein, G., Sunstein, C. R., & Golman, R. (2014). Disclosure: Psychology changes everything. Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 391–419.
Luke, C. (1989). Pedagogy, printing, and Protestantism: The discourse on childhood. New York: State University of New York Press.
Lurger, B. (2017). Psychology meets law: In search for new tools of consumer self-protection. Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht & Handelspraktijken, 6, 248–256.
Lurger, B., Vogrincic-Haselbacher, C., Caks, F., Anslinger, J., Dinslaken, I., & Athenstaedt, U. (2016). Consumer decisions under high information load: How can legal rules improve search behavior and decision quality? Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2731655.
Luth, H., & Cseres, K. (2010). The DFCR and consumer protection: An economic assessment. In P. Larouche Pierre & F. Chirico (Eds.), Economic Analysis of the DFCR: The Work of the Economic Impact Group within the CoPECL (pp. 235-276). Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers.
Luzak, J. (2005). Online disclosure rules of the consumer rights directive: Protecting passive or active consumers? Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 3, 79–87.
Luzak, J. (2014). Privacy notice for dummies? Towards European guidelines on how to give “clear and comprehensive information” on the cookies’ use in order to protect the Internet users’ right to online privacy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(4), 547–559.
Luzak, J., & Mak, V. (2014). The Consumer Rights Directive. In A.S. Hartkamp, C.H. Sieburgh, L.A.D. Keus, J.S. Kortmann & M.H. Wissink (Eds.), De Invloed van het Europese Recht op het Nederlandse Privaatrecht, part II (pp. 67–92). Deventer: Kluwer.
Mak, V. (2011). Standards of protection: In search of the ‘average consumer’ of EU law in the proposal for a Consumer Rights Directive. European Review of Private Law, 1, 25–42.
Mak, V. (2012). The myth of the ‘empowered consumer’: Lessons from financial literacy studies. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Unternehmens-und Verbraucherrecht, 1(4), 254–263.
Mankowski, P. (2005). Information and formal requirements in EC private law. European Review of Private Law, 6, 779–796.
Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2011). Will increased disclosure help? Evaluating the recommendations of the ALI’s ‘principles of the law of software contracts. University of Chicago Law Review, 78, 165–186.
Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2012). Does contract disclosure matter? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 168, 94–119.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85–139.
Micklitz, H.-W., Pałka, P., & Panagis, Y. (2017). The empire strikes back: Digital control of unfair terms of online services. Journal of Consumer Policy, 40(3), 367–388.
Milne, G., & Culnan, M. (2004). Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(2), 15–30.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nordhausen Scholes, A. (2009). Information requirements. In G. Howells (Ed.), Modernising and harmonising consumer contract law (pp. 213–236). Munich: Sellier European Law Publishing.
Nordhausen, A. (2004). Information requirements in the E-Commerce Directive and the proposed Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices. In G. Howells, A. Janssen & R. Schulze (Eds.), Information rights and obligations: A challenge for party autonomy and transactional fairness (pp. 93–114). Hants, UK: Ashgate.
O’Shea, P. (2008). Consumer credit disclosure: Does it work? Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, 16(1), 5–16.
OECD. (2007). Roundtable on economics for consumer policy. Summary report. Report of the Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Committee on Consumer Policy. DSTI/CP(2007)1/FINAL. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/consumer/39015963.pdf.
Oehler, A., & Wendt, S. (2017). Good consumer information: The information paradigm at its (dead) end? Journal of Consumer Policy, 40(2), 179–191.
Panzarasa, P., Kujawski, B., Hammond, E. J., & Roberts, C. M. (2016). Temporal patterns and dynamics of e-learning usage in medical education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 115–136.
Park, Y. J., Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2012). Affect, cognition and reward: Predictors of privacy protection online. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1019–1027.
Phillips, B. (2016). Beyond classroom learning: Personalized learning through digital technologies. Forschungsforum der österreichischen Fachhochschulen 2016. Vienna: FHK. Retrieved from http://ffhoarep.fh-ooe.at/bitstream/123456789/664/1/120_214_Phillips_FullPaper_en_Final.pdf.
Plesea Doru, A., Maiorescu, I., & Cirstea, A. (2014). Consumers’ attitude towards consumer protection in the digital single market, as reflected by European barometers. Amfiteatru Economic, 16(36), 563–577.
Pollach, I. (2005). A typology of communicative strategies in online privacy policies: Ethics, power and informed consent. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 221–235.
Purnhagen, K. (2015). Why do we need responsive regulation and behavioural research in EU internal market law? In K. Mathis (Ed.), European perspectives on behavioural law and economics (pp. 51–70). Cham: Springer International.
Reich, N., & Micklitz, H.-W. (2014). Economic law, consumer interests, and EU integration. In N. Reich, H.-W. Micklitz, P. Rott, & K. Tonner (Eds.), European consumer law (pp. 30–45). Cambridge: Intersentia.
Riesenhuber, K. (2013). Information über die Verwendung des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Kaufrechts—Gedanken zum Harmonisierungskonzept. In K. Riesenhuber, F. Klinck, & I. Karatostas (Eds.), Information als Schutzinstrument (pp. 67–76). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Rinkes, J. (2006). European consumer law: Making sense. Zutphen: Uitgeverij Paris.
Sah, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2014). Nothing to declare: Mandatory and voluntary disclosure leads advisors to avoid conflicts of interest. Psychological Science, 25(2), 575–584.
Schebesta, H., & Purnhagen, K. (2016). The behaviour of the average consumer: A little less normativity and a little more reality in CJEU’s case law? Reflections on Teekanne (Wageningen working paper in law and governance 2016/03). Wageningen, NL. Retrieved from https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/393406.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage Publications.
Schrøder, K. C. (2000). Making sense of audience discourses: Towards a multidimensional model of mass media reception. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 3, 233–258.
Schulte-Nölke, H. (2005). Perspectives for the development of European consumer law. Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en Handelspraktijken, 137–140.
Seira, E., Elizondo, A., & Laguna-Müggenburg, E. (2017). Are information disclosures effective? Evidence from the credit card market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(1), 277–307.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Tscherner, E. (2014). Can behavioural research advance mandatory law, information duties, standard terms and withdrawal rights? Austrian Law Journal, 1, 144–155.
TNS. (2012). Bank fees behavior study. Final report. European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/financial_services/reference_studies_documents/docs/report_6146_bankfees_en.pdf.
Trzaskowski, J. (2011). Behavioural economics, neuroscience, and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 377–392.
Van Boom, W. H., Desmet, P., & Van Dam, M. (2016). If it’s easy to read, it’s easy to claim–the effect of the readability of insurance contracts on consumer expectations and conflict behaviour. Journal of Consumer Policy, 39(2), 187–197.
Van Herpen, E., & Van Trijp, H. (2011). Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints. Appetite, 57(1), 148–160.
Van Kleef, E., Van Trijp, H., Paeps, F., & Fernandez-Celemin, L. (2008). Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling. Public Health Nutrition, 11(2), 203–213.
Van Roy, V., Rossetti, F., & Piculescu, V. (2015). Consumer conditions in the EU: Revised framework and empirical investigation. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
Waller, R. (2017). Graphic literacies for a digital age. In A. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information design: Research and practice (pp. 177–203). London: Routledge.
Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
Weatherill, S. (2012). The Consumer Rights Directive: How and why a quest for “coherence” has (largely) failed. Common Market Law Review, 49(4), 1279–1339.
Willemsen, L., Neijens, P., Bronner, F., & de Ridder, J. (2011). “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 19–38.
Willis, L. E. (2008). Against financial literacy education. Iowa Law Review, 49, 197–285.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
Wulf, A. J. (2016). Who would use the Common European Sales Law? An empirical analysis of consumer cross-border contracts in the European internal market. Polish Yearbook of Law & Economics, 6, 31–50.
We sincerely thank Marco Loos and Mia Junuzović, who are also participating in this project, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. We also thank participants of workshops where we presented this paper for their feedback. All authors contributed equally to the paper.
This research is funded by the DFG (German Research Foundation; project number: WU 824/1-1). It is part of the research project “The ABC of Online Disclosure Duties. Towards a More Uniform Assessment of the Transparency of Consumer Information in Europe” funded by the DFG and the NWO, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research under the Open Research Area for the Social Sciences funding program.
About this article
Cite this article
Seizov, O., Wulf, A.J. & Luzak, J. The Transparent Trap: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on the Design of Transparent Online Disclosures in the EU. J Consum Policy 42, 149–173 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9393-0
- Information obligations
- Online communication
- Consumer protection
- Information design