Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 51–79 | Cite as

Does Community Access to Alternative Financial Services Relate to Individuals’ Use of These Services? Beyond Individual Explanations

Original Paper

Abstract

There is concern that the increasing number of alternative financial services in communities across the USA is risking individuals’ financial health by increasing their use of these high-cost services. To address this concern, this study used restricted-access, zip code data from nationally representative samples of adult individuals and examined associations between the density or concentration of alternative financial services within communities and individuals’ use of these services. The associations between community density and individuals’ use varied by annual household income: Communities’ higher density of alternative financial services was associated with the increased probability that modest- and highest-income individuals ever used these services, while higher density was associated with more chronic use among lowest-income individuals. State regulation that prohibited payday lenders had a protective association for modest- and highest-income individuals but had no effect for lowest-income individuals. Policy implications are discussed.

Keywords

Alternative financial services Payday lenders Collective efficacy National Financial Capability Study (NFCS) 

References

  1. Anderson, S., Zhan, M., & Scott, J. (2007). Improving the knowledge and attitudes of low-income families about banking and predatory financial practices. Families in Society, 88(3), 443–452. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apgar, W., & Herbert, C. (2006). Subprime lending and alternative financial service providers: A literature review and empirical analysis. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.gov/Publications/pdf/sublending.pdf.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baradaran, M. (2013). How the poor got cut out of banking. Emory Law Journal, 62(3), 483–548.Google Scholar
  6. Baradaran, M. (2015). How the other half banks: Exclusion, exploitation, and the threat to democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2011). Information disclosure, cognitive biases, and payday borrowing. The Journal of Finance, 66(6), 1865–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhutta, N. (2014). Payday loans and consumer financial health. Journal of Banking & Finance, 47, 230–242. Google Scholar
  9. Bhutta, N., Skiba, P., & Tobacman, J. (2015). Payday loan choices and consequences. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 47(2–3), 223–260. Google Scholar
  10. Birkenmaier, J., & Fu, Q. (2015). The association of alternative financial services usage and financial access: Evidence from the National Financial Capability Study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. Advance online publication. Google Scholar
  11. Burkey, M., & Simkins, S. (2004). Factors affecting the location of payday lending and traditional banking services in North Carolina. The Review of Regional Studies, 34(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, S. (2015). Payday loan and pawnshop usage: the impact of allowing payday loan rollovers. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 49(2), 436–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caskey, J. (1994). Fringe banking: Check cashing outlets, pawnshops, and the poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Chin, P. (2004). Payday loans: the case for federal legislation. University of Illinois Law Review, 2004(3), 723–754.Google Scholar
  15. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2016). Payday, vehicle title, and certain high-cost installment loans. Washington, DC: CFPB. Retrieved from http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/Rulemaking_Payday_Vehicle_Title_Certain_High-Cost_Installment_Loans.pdf.
  16. Crawford, T., Jilcott Pitts, S., McGuirt, J., Keyserling, T., & Ammerman, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and comparing neighborhood and activity space measures for food environment research. Health & Place, 30, 215–225. Google Scholar
  17. Dunham, I., & Foster, A. (2015). Proximate landscapes of economic inclusion in Southeastern Pennsylvania. The Professional Geographer, 67(1), 132–144. Google Scholar
  18. Elhai, J., Calhoun, P., & Ford, J. (2008). Statistical procedures for analyzing mental health services data. Psychiatry Research, 160, 129–136.Google Scholar
  19. Elliehausen, G. (2006). Consumers’ use of high-price credit products: Do they know what they are doing? Terra Haute, In: Indiana State University, Networks Financial Institute. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/t817f094/Downloads/SSRN-id921909.pdfGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott, W., & Sherraden, M. S. (2013). Institutional facilitation and CSA effects. In W. Elliott (Ed.), Biannual report on the assets and education field (pp. 30–49). Lawrence: University of Kansas, Center on Assets, Education, and Inclusion (AEDI).Google Scholar
  21. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (1997). An examination of the banking crises of the 1980s and early 1990s. Washington, DC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/history/vol1.html.
  22. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2009). Alternative financial services: A primer. Washington, DC: FDIC. Retrieved from https://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/quarterly/2009_vol3_1/AltFinServicesprimer.html.
  23. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2013). 2013 national survey of unbanked and underbanked households. Washington, DC: FDIC. Retrieved from https://www.fdic.gov/householdsurvey/
  24. Fejős, A. (2015). Achieving safety and affordability in the UK payday loans market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38(2), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernandes, D., Lynch Jr, J., & Netemeyer, R. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), 1861–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallmeyer, A., & Roberts, W. (2009). Payday lenders and economically distressed communities: a spatial analysis of financial predation. The Social Science Journal, 46, 521–538.Google Scholar
  27. Getter, D. (2015). The effectiveness of the Community Reinvestment Act. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43661.pdf.
  28. Graves, S. (2003). Landscapes of predation, landscapes of neglect: a location analysis of payday lenders and banks. The Professional Geographer, 55(3), 303–317.Google Scholar
  29. Graves, S., & Peterson, C. (2005). Predatory lending and the military: the law and geography of “payday” loans in military towns. Ohio State Law Journal, 66(4), 653–832.Google Scholar
  30. Hilbe, J. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnston, K., Gustafson, P., Levy, A., & Grootendorst, P. (2008). Use of instrumental variables in the analysis of generalized linear models in the presence of unmeasured confounding with applications to epidemiological research. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 1539–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, J. (2002). The poor in the financial market: changes in the use of financial products, institutions, and services from 1995 to 1998. Journal of Consumer Policy, 25(2), 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Lusardi, A. (2011). Americans’ financial capability (NBER Working Paper No. 17103). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.astrid-online.it/Dossier--d1/United-Sta/FINANCIAL-1/Forum-to-E/Lusardi_Forum_02_10.pdf.
  35. Lusardi, A., & de Bassa Scheresberg, C. (2013). Financial literacy and high-cost borrowing in the United States (NBER Working Paper No. 18969). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lusardi, A., Schneider, D., & Tufano, P. (2011). Financially fragile households: Evidence and implications (NBER Working Paper No. 17072). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  37. McKernan, S.-M., Ratcliffe, C., & Kuehn, D. (2013). Prohibitions, price caps, and disclosures: a look at state policies and alternative financial product use. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 95, 207–223.Google Scholar
  38. Melzer, B. (2011). The real costs of credit access: evidence from the payday lending market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 126(1), 517–555.Google Scholar
  39. Morenoff, J., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–558.Google Scholar
  40. Morgan, D., Strain, M., & Seblani, I. (2012). How payday credit access affects overdrafts and other outcomes. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking , 44(2–3), 519–531.Google Scholar
  41. Morse, A. (2011). Payday lenders: heroes or villains? Journal of Financial Economics, 102, 28–44.Google Scholar
  42. Pew Charitable Trusts. (2012). Payday lending in America: who borrows, where they borrow, and why. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/∽/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2012/pewpaydaylendingreportpdf.pdf.
  43. Pew Charitable Trusts. (2015). Understanding the CFPB proposal for payday and other small loans. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2015/07/understanding-the-cfpb-proposal-for-payday-and-other-small-loans.
  44. Pinto, M. B., Parente, D. H., & Mansfield, P. M. (2005). Information learned from socialization agents: its relationship to credit card use. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(4), 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pitblado, J. (2009). Survey data analysis in Stata. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  46. Robb, C., Babiarz, P., Woodyard, A., & Seay, M. (2015). Bounded rationality and use of alternative financial services. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 49(2), 407–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roux, A. (2001). Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1783–1789.Google Scholar
  48. Sampson, R. (1997). Collective regulation of adolescent misbehavior: validation results from Chicago neighborhoods. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sampson, R. (Ed.) (2008). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Saunders, A., & Schumacher, L. (2000). The determinants of bank interest rate margins: an international study. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19(6), 813–832.Google Scholar
  51. Servon, L., & Castro-Cosío, A. (2015). Reframing the debate about financial inclusion: Evidence from an up close view of alternative financial services. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Economic Mobility Conference. Retrieved from https://www.stlouisfed.org/∽/media/Files/PDFs/Community%20Development/Econ%20Mobility/Sessions/ServonPaper508.pdf.
  52. Sherraden, M. S. (2013). Building blocks of financial capability. In J. Birkenmaier, M. S. Sherraden, & J. Curley (Eds.), Financial education and capability: Research, education, policy, and practice (pp. 3–43). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sheu, M., Hu, T., Keeler, T., Ong, M., & Sung, H. (2004). The effect of a major cigarette price change on smoking behavior in California: a zero-inflated negative binomial model. Health Economics, 13, 781–791.Google Scholar
  54. Shim, S., Barber, B. L., Card, N. A., Xiao, J. J., & Serido, J. (2010). Financial socialization of first-year college students: the roles of parents, work, and education. Journal of youth and adolescence , 39, 1457–1470.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, T., Smith, M., & Wackes, J. (2008). Alternative financial service providers and the spatial void hypothesis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(3), 205–227.Google Scholar
  56. Temkin, K, & Sawyer, N. (2004). Analysis of alternative financial service providers. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/410935-Analysis-of-Alternative-Financial-Service-Providers.PDF.
  57. US Census Bureau. (2015). Zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs). Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/zctas.html.
  58. Yen, I., & Kaplan, G. (1999). Neighborhood social environment and risk of death: multilevel evidence from the Alameda County Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149(10), 898–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WelfareUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations