Skip to main content

Life Events as Windows of Opportunity for Changing Towards Sustainable Consumption Patterns?

Results from an Intervention Study

Journal of Consumer Policy volume 35, pages 65–84 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Strategies for motivating households towards sustainable consumption are confronted with the challenge of addressing seldom-reflected-upon routines, which cannot easily be changed. We investigate whether life-course transitions can serve as starting point for sustainable consumption interventions, assuming that during such transitions people already need to adapt their behavioural routines and are thus more receptive to interventions. The effects of two different campaigns (information mailing and personal consultation) were evaluated for people experiencing two different kinds of life events (childbirth and relocation). The experimental study found that the consultation campaign had significant effects on sustainable consumption concerning some of the focussed on behaviours, but did not have greater effects on the life-events groups. Mailing of information did not result in significant behavioural changes. To get a clearer picture about the impact of life-course transitions on everyday routines and susceptibility to interventions, additional qualitative interviews were carried out. The results indicate that everyday routines and consumption patterns change during life-course transitions, but with heterogeneous results regarding sustainability. The interviews revealed that the preparation phase preceding life events and a rather short period after them are decisive for changes in routine. Tentative explanations for the low impact of the consultation campaign on the persons in life-course transition are that the campaign addressed the target groups too late and that its design was not specifically adapted to these target groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. The terms “routines” and “habits” are used as synonyms in this article.

  2. The study was part of the project “Life events as windows of opportunity for a change towards sustainable consumption patterns” (abbreviated as “LifeEvents”), which sought to investigate the influence of two life events on everyday consumption patterns as well as the susceptibility of people to interventions promoting sustainable consumption following life events. This was a collaborative project between the Technische Universität Berlin and the University of Applied Sciences Bielefeld, funded from 2007 to 2011 by the Social-ecological research programme of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. For more information: http://www.lifeevents.de.

  3. This article focuses on the results concerning the significance of life events. Articles explaining details of the qualitative methods and results as well as on psychological theory underpinning the intervention are in the process of being published and will be announced on this website: http://www.lifeevents.de.

  4. More information about the evaluation tools is available by contacting the authors.

References

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S. (2000). The promotion of new behavior by forming an implementation intention—Results from a field-experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1903–1922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S. (2006). Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people’s travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environment and Behavior, 38, 820–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S. (2007). Is a stage model a useful approach to explain car drivers’ willingness to use public transportation? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1757–1783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S. (in press). Processes of change. In: L. Steg, A. E. van den Berg, & J. I. M. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction. New York: Wiley

  • Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the “value-action gap” in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, K.-W. (2010). Social practices and sustainable consumption: Benefits and limitations of a new theoretical approach. In M. Gross & H. Heinrich (Eds.), Environmental sociology: European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges (pp. 217–235). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, G., & Lewis, A. (1999). Reducing household energy consumption: A qualitative and quantitative field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M., & Ogden, J. (1999). The impact of pregnancy on eating behaviour and aspects of weight concern. International Journal of Obesity, 23, 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback. The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvill, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2003). Effects of increased awareness on choice of travel mode. Transportation, 30, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, W. R., & Hekimian, A. J. (1983). Measuring the effectiveness of personalized ridersharing assistance. Transportation Research Records, 914, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986–87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behavior: A meta-analysis, The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption—SDRN briefing 1, London: Policy Studies Institute. Retrieved March 29, 2011 from www.sd-research.org.uk/researchreviews/documents/MotivatingSCfinal.pdf.

  • Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2002). Effects of economic disincentives on private car use. Transportation, 29, 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., Woelfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G. R., Verplanken, B., Manstead, A. S. R., Stroebe, W., Abraham, C. S., Sheeran, P., et al. (2008). Social psychological factors in lifestyle change and their relevance to policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 99–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres, A. (1993). Evaluating employer-based transportation demand management programs. Transportation Research, 27A, 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, G., Stead, M., Jones, S. Mc, Dermott, L., & Mc Vie, D. (2007). The paradoxical food buying behaviour of parents: Insights from the UK and Australia. British Food Journal, 109(5), 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Promoting Sustainable Consumption. Danvers: Orgnaisation for Economic Co-operation and Development publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, C. M. (2005). Tracking food choices across the transition to motherhood. Journal of Nutrition, Education and Behaviour, 37, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, S., & Verplanken, B. (2010). The automatic component of habit in health behavior: Habit as cue-contingent automaticity. Health Psychology, 29, 374–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanne, C. (2002). Willing consumers—or locked in? Policies for a sustainable consumption. Ecological Economics, 42, 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M., & Bamberg, S. (2008). Breaking habits: Linking sustainable consumption campaigns to sensitive life events. Proceedings: Sustainable Consumption and Production: Framework for Action, 10–11 March 2008, Brussels, Belgium. Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE!) Network, supported by the EU’s 6th Framework Programme.

  • Schäfer, M., Herde, A., & Kropp, C. (2010). Life events as turning points for sustainable nutrition. In U. Tischner, U. Kjærnes, E. Stø, & A. Tukker (Eds.), System innovation for sustainability 4: Sustainable consumption and production of food (pp. 210–226). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, U. (2007). The moral responsibility of consumers as citizens. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sia, A. P., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1985–86). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis, The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staats, H., Harland, P., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2004). Effecting durable change. A team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, G. J., Seligman, C., Kantola, S. J., & MacPherson, D. K. (1987). Evaluating a television campaign to promote petrol conservation. Environment and Behavior, 19, 444–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J. (2009). Seize the opportunity: The importance of timing for breaking commuters’ car driving habits. In V. Klein & V. W. Thoresen (Eds.), Making a difference: Putting consumer citizenship into action (pp. 87–93). Hedmark: Høgskolen i Hedmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A., Huppes, G., Guinee, J., Heijungs, R., Koning, A., van Oers, L, et al. (2006). Environmental impact of products (EIPRO). European Commission DG Joint Reseach Centre. Retrieved March 29, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf.

  • Verbeke, W., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2007). Dietary behaviour of pregnant versus non-pregnant women. Appetite, 48, 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of automaticity? European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25(1), 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völlink, T., & Meerten, R. M. (1999). De effectiviteit van elektronische feedback over het energie - en waterverbruik door middel van teletekst bij huishoudens. (The effectiveness of electronic feedback on household energy use and water use by means of text TV). In R. M. Meertens, R. Vermunt, J. B. F. De Wit, & J. F. Ybema (Eds.), Sociale psychologie en haar toepassingen (pp. 79–91). Delft: Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, A. (2000). Das problemzentrierte Interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 22. Retrieved February 3rd from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:00^14-fqs0001228

  • Wood, W., Tam, L., & Guerrero-Witt, M. (2005). Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 88, 918–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Technology and Society, Technische Universität Berlin, Sekr. HBS 1, Hardenbergstr. 16-18, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    Martina Schäfer & Melanie Jaeger-Erben

  2. University of Applied Sciences Bielefeld, Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 6, 633615, Bielefeld, Germany

    Sebastian Bamberg

Authors
  1. Martina Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melanie Jaeger-Erben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Bamberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Schäfer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schäfer, M., Jaeger-Erben, M. & Bamberg, S. Life Events as Windows of Opportunity for Changing Towards Sustainable Consumption Patterns?. J Consum Policy 35, 65–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9181-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9181-6

Keywords

  • Sustainable consumption
  • Life events
  • Mixed methods
  • Sustainability interventions
  • Everyday life