Life Events as Windows of Opportunity for Changing Towards Sustainable Consumption Patterns?
- 1.3k Downloads
Strategies for motivating households towards sustainable consumption are confronted with the challenge of addressing seldom-reflected-upon routines, which cannot easily be changed. We investigate whether life-course transitions can serve as starting point for sustainable consumption interventions, assuming that during such transitions people already need to adapt their behavioural routines and are thus more receptive to interventions. The effects of two different campaigns (information mailing and personal consultation) were evaluated for people experiencing two different kinds of life events (childbirth and relocation). The experimental study found that the consultation campaign had significant effects on sustainable consumption concerning some of the focussed on behaviours, but did not have greater effects on the life-events groups. Mailing of information did not result in significant behavioural changes. To get a clearer picture about the impact of life-course transitions on everyday routines and susceptibility to interventions, additional qualitative interviews were carried out. The results indicate that everyday routines and consumption patterns change during life-course transitions, but with heterogeneous results regarding sustainability. The interviews revealed that the preparation phase preceding life events and a rather short period after them are decisive for changes in routine. Tentative explanations for the low impact of the consultation campaign on the persons in life-course transition are that the campaign addressed the target groups too late and that its design was not specifically adapted to these target groups.
KeywordsSustainable consumption Life events Mixed methods Sustainability interventions Everyday life
- Bamberg, S. (in press). Processes of change. In: L. Steg, A. E. van den Berg, & J. I. M. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
- Brand, K.-W. (2010). Social practices and sustainable consumption: Benefits and limitations of a new theoretical approach. In M. Gross & H. Heinrich (Eds.), Environmental sociology: European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges (pp. 217–235). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Hershey, W. R., & Hekimian, A. J. (1983). Measuring the effectiveness of personalized ridersharing assistance. Transportation Research Records, 914, 14–21.Google Scholar
- Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986–87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behavior: A meta-analysis, The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption—SDRN briefing 1, London: Policy Studies Institute. Retrieved March 29, 2011 from www.sd-research.org.uk/researchreviews/documents/MotivatingSCfinal.pdf.
- Modarres, A. (1993). Evaluating employer-based transportation demand management programs. Transportation Research, 27A, 291–297.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2008). Promoting Sustainable Consumption. Danvers: Orgnaisation for Economic Co-operation and Development publications.Google Scholar
- Schäfer, M., & Bamberg, S. (2008). Breaking habits: Linking sustainable consumption campaigns to sensitive life events. Proceedings: Sustainable Consumption and Production: Framework for Action, 10–11 March 2008, Brussels, Belgium. Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE!) Network, supported by the EU’s 6th Framework Programme.Google Scholar
- Schäfer, M., Herde, A., & Kropp, C. (2010). Life events as turning points for sustainable nutrition. In U. Tischner, U. Kjærnes, E. Stø, & A. Tukker (Eds.), System innovation for sustainability 4: Sustainable consumption and production of food (pp. 210–226). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
- Sia, A. P., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1985–86). Selected predictors of responsible environmental behavior: An analysis, The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(2), 31–40.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Thøgersen, J. (2009). Seize the opportunity: The importance of timing for breaking commuters’ car driving habits. In V. Klein & V. W. Thoresen (Eds.), Making a difference: Putting consumer citizenship into action (pp. 87–93). Hedmark: Høgskolen i Hedmark.Google Scholar
- Tukker, A., Huppes, G., Guinee, J., Heijungs, R., Koning, A., van Oers, L, et al. (2006). Environmental impact of products (EIPRO). European Commission DG Joint Reseach Centre. Retrieved March 29, 2011 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf.
- Völlink, T., & Meerten, R. M. (1999). De effectiviteit van elektronische feedback over het energie - en waterverbruik door middel van teletekst bij huishoudens. (The effectiveness of electronic feedback on household energy use and water use by means of text TV). In R. M. Meertens, R. Vermunt, J. B. F. De Wit, & J. F. Ybema (Eds.), Sociale psychologie en haar toepassingen (pp. 79–91). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
- Witzel, A. (2000). Das problemzentrierte Interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 22. Retrieved February 3rd from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:00^14-fqs0001228