Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 25–42 | Cite as

Developing Policies and Instruments for Sustainable Household Consumption: Irish Experiences and Futures

  • Jessica Pape
  • Henrike Rau
  • Frances Fahy
  • Anna Davies
Original Paper

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of sustainable consumption (SC) has received increased attention. Overconsumption in industrialized countries still presents major challenges to achieving sustainable development goals despite the global economic crisis. This paper offers an in-depth analysis of national influences on consumption patterns in the Republic of Ireland, focusing in particular on the role of governance in the design of policy instruments for sustainable consumption. It is argued that country-specific political conditions and policy frameworks fundamentally shape everyday household consumption. After an initial discussion of the effectiveness of three key types of policy instruments—legislative, economic, communicative—the paper compares SC policy making and implementation in Ireland with examples of good practice from Europe. An agenda to progress Ireland’s sustainable consumption policy framework is proposed in the concluding part of the paper.

Keywords

Sustainable consumption Governance Ireland Policy instruments 

References

  1. An Taisce. (2001). The performance of the Irish Green Schools programme: Results of the Green Schools research projects. An Taisce (The National Trust for Ireland). Dublin: An Taisce.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, M. S. (2000). Designing and introducing green taxes: Institutional dimensions. In M. S. Andersen & R. U. Sprenger (Eds.), Market-based instruments for environmental management (pp. 67–88). Cheltenham: Politics and Institutions.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, J. (2009). ‘It ain’t easy being green’: Sustainable development between environment and economy in Northern Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 24, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, A. (2010). Not roadmaps but toolboxes: Analysing pioneering national programmes for sustainable consumption and production. Retrieved June 1, 2010, from Springer Link: http://www.springerlink.com/content/d32470816g364436/.
  5. Blowers, A., & Hinchliffe, S. (Eds.). (2003). Environmental responses. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Boström, M., & Klintman, M. (2008). Eco-standards, product labelling and green consumerism. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brand, K. W. (2008). Konsum im Kontext. Der “verantwortliche Konsument”—ein Motor nachhaltigen Konsums? In H. Lange (Ed.), Nachhaltigkeit als radikaler Wandel (pp. 71–93). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  8. Buckingham, S. (2008). The rise of environmental politics and the environmental movement. In S. Buckingham & M. Turner (Eds.), Understanding environmental issues. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Burgess, J., Bedford, T., Hobson, K., Davies, G., & Harrison, C. (2003). (Un) sustainable consumption. In F. Berkhout, M. Leach, & I. Scoones (Eds.), Negotiating environmental change: New perspectives from social science (pp. 261–291). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Cherp, A., George, C., & Kirkpatrick, C. (2004). A methodology for assessing national sustainable development strategies. Environmental Planning C: Government and Policy, 22, 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, M. J., & Murphy, J. (Eds.). (2001). Exploring sustainable consumption: Environmental policy and the social sciences. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  12. Comhar. (2009). Budgets and sustainability: ‘Smart’ taxes and budget 2010. Comhar Sustainable Development Council.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, H. E. (1996). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, A. R. (1999). Environmental education, ethics and citizenship conference: Report of discussion. Ethics, Place and Environment, 2, 82–87.Google Scholar
  15. Davies, A. R. (2002). Mass media environmental awareness campaigns in Ireland: A critical reflection. Geographical Viewpoint, 30, 18–25.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, A. R. (2007). A wasted opportunity? Civil society and waste management in Ireland. Environmental Politics, 16, 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies, A. R. (2009). Does sustainability count? Environmental policy, sustainable development and the governance of grassroots sustainability enterprise in Ireland. Sustainable Development, 17, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, A. R., & O’Callaghan-Platt, A. (2008). A nationwide review of pay-by-use (PBU) domestic waste collection charges in Ireland. Dublin: EPA.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, A. R., Fahy, F., Rau, H., & Pape, J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Practices and governance. Irish Geography, 43, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Young, R. (1993). Changing behaviour and making it stick. Environment and Behavior, 25, 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doran, P. (2007). Sustainable consumption & production—‘The art of the state’, Recommendations to Comhar for the 2007 review of the national sustainable development strategy. Belfast: Queen’s University Belfast.Google Scholar
  22. EC. (2008). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  23. EPA. (2006). Environment in focus: Environmental indicators for Ireland. Dublin: Environment Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  24. EPA. (2008). Ireland’s environment 2008. Dublin: Environment Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  25. Flynn, B. (2007). The blame game: Rethinking Ireland’s sustainable development and environmental performance. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review, 87, 746–755.Google Scholar
  27. Fuchs, D. A., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  29. Government of Ireland. (1997). Sustainable development—A strategy for Ireland. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behaviour relationships. Environment and Behaviour, 27, 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hawthorne, M., & Alabaster, T. (1999). Citizen 2000: Development of a model of environmental citizenship. Global Environmental Change, 9, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howlett, M. (2004). Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: Instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy and Society, 23(2), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth—Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  34. Jackson, T., & Michaelis, L. (2003). Sustainable consumption & production, economic, regeneration: Policies for sustainable consumption. Sustainable Development Commission.Google Scholar
  35. Klintman, M. (2009). Participation in green consumer policies: Deliberative democracy under wrong conditions? Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knill, C. (2008). Europäische Umweltpolitik. Steuerungsprobleme und Regulierungsmuster im Mehrebenensystem. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  37. Lafferty, W., & Meadowcroft, J. (2000). Implementing sustainable development. Strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Leonard, L. (2008). The environmental movement in Ireland. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leubuscher, S., Hager, W., Wattiez, C., Farmer Mombrù, J., & Liaska, E. (1998). Study on verification and control of environmental product claims. Report prepared by ProSpect C&S for DG Health and Consumer Protection.Google Scholar
  40. Linden, A., & Carlsson-Kanyama, A. (2003). Environmentally friendly disposal behaviour. Local Environment, 8, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Linder, S., & Peters, G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Mason, M. (1999). Environmental democracy. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  44. Mathar, R. (2006). Eco-Schools and Green Schools. In J. Lee & M. Williams (Eds.), Environment and geographical education for sustainability: Cultural contexts Nova Scotia (pp. 139–153). Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Mayo, E., & Knight, A. (2006). I will if you will—Towards sustainable consumption. Sustainable Consumption Roundtable.Google Scholar
  46. McDonald, F., & Nix, J. (2005). Chaos at the crossroads. Dublin: Gandon.Google Scholar
  47. Murphy, J. (2001). From production to consumption: Environmental policy in the European Union. In M. J. Cohen & J. Murphy (Eds.), Exploring sustainable consumption: Environmental policy and the social sciences. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  48. Nash, H. A. (2009). The European Commission’s sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 496–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Niestroy, I. (2005). Sustaining sustainability: A benchmark study on national strategies towards—Ireland. EEAC series Background study no. 2.Google Scholar
  50. Ó Broin, D., & Waters, E. (2007). Governing below the centre—Local governance in Ireland. Dublin: TASC.Google Scholar
  51. Ó Gallachóir, B., Keane, B. P., Morrissey, E., & O’Donnell, J. (2007). Using indicators to profile energy consumption and to inform energy policy in a university—A case study in Ireland. Energy and Buildings, 39, 913–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. OECD. (2002). Towards sustainable household consumption? Trends and policies in OECD countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation end Development.Google Scholar
  53. OECD. (2008). Promoting sustainable consumption. Good practices in OECD Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation end Development.Google Scholar
  54. Owens, S. (2000). Engaging the publics: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1141–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pape, J. (2009). Domestic driving factors of environmental performance: The role of regulatory styles in the case of water protection policy in France and the Netherlands 1970–2005. Suedwestdeutscher Verlag fuer Hochschulschriften.Google Scholar
  56. Pelletier, L. G., Legault, L. R., & Tuson, K. M. (1996). The environmental satisfaction scale. Environment and Behaviour, 28, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pender, A., & Dunne, L. (2007). The use and regulation of environmental claims as a means for promoting sustainable consumption in Ireland. Final Report, prepared for the EPA and The Environmental Institute, UCD.Google Scholar
  58. Petts, J. (1997). The public-expert interface in local waste management decisions: Expertise, credibility and process. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Princen, T. (2003). Principles for sustainability: From cooperation and efficency to sufficiency. Global Environmental Politics, 3(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rau, H. (2008). Environmental arguing at a crossroads? Cultural diversity in Irish transport planning. In R. Edmondson & H. Rau (Eds.), Environmental argument and cultural difference: Locations, fractures and deliberations (pp. 95–124). Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  61. Rau, H., & Hennessy, C. (2009). The road to sustainable transport? Rural transport programmes and policies in Ireland. In J. McDonagh, A. Varley, & S. Shortall (Eds.), A living countryside? The politics of sustainable development in rural Ireland (pp. 361–378). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  62. Rubik, F., Scholl, G., Biedenkopf, K., Kalimo, H., Mohaupt, F., Soebech, O., et al. (2009). Promoting sustainable consumption—New policy approaches. Policy brief. Retrieved March 2010, from http://www.ioew.de/uploads/tx_ukioewdb/ASCEE_Policy_Paper_Promoting_Sustainable_Consumption_01.pdf.
  63. Schor, J. (1999). The new politics of consumption. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from Boston Review: http://www.bostonreview.net/BR24.3/schor.html.
  64. Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, information and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In T. Dietz & P. C. Stern (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures (pp. 67–82). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  65. Scott, W., & Oulton, C. (2000). Environmental education and teacher education: A critical review of effective theory and practice. In A. Warhurst (Ed.), Towards a collaborative environmental research agenda: Challenges for business and society (pp. 89–106). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. SEAI. (2008). Demand side management in Ireland: Evaluating the energy efficiency opportunities. Dublin: Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland.Google Scholar
  67. SEAI. (2009). Energy efficiency in Ireland 2009 report. Dublin: Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland.Google Scholar
  68. Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  69. Southerton, D., Chappells, H., & Van Vliet, B. (2004). Sustainable consumption—The implications of changing infrastructures of provision. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  70. Spaargaren, G. (2003). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stern, P. C. (1999). Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Taylor, G. (2001). Conserving the Emerald Tiger—The politics of environmental regulation in Ireland. Dublin: Arlen House.Google Scholar
  73. Thøgersen, J. (2005a). Consumer behaviour and the environment: Which role for information? In S. Krarup & C. S. Russell (Eds.), Environment, information and consumer behaviour (pp. 51–63). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  74. Thøgersen, J. (2005b). How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 143–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. UN DESA, & UNEP. (2008). Marrakesh task force: Frequently asked questions. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  76. UNEP. (2004). Sustainable consumption and production in the European Union. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  77. UNEP. (2008). Planning for change: Guidelines for national programmes on sustainable consumption and production. United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  78. Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behaviour, 22, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilhite, H., & Lutzenhiser, L. (1999). Social loading and sustainable consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 281–287.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica Pape
    • 1
    • 2
  • Henrike Rau
    • 3
  • Frances Fahy
    • 4
  • Anna Davies
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.School of Geography and ArchaeologyNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  3. 3.School of Political Science and SociologyNUI, GalwayGalwayIreland
  4. 4.School of Geography and ArchaeologyNational University of Ireland, GalwayGalway CityIreland
  5. 5.Department of GeographyTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations