Advertisement

Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 421–449 | Cite as

Inadequate Life?Evidence of Consumer Attitudes to Product Obsolescence

  • Tim Cooper
Article

Abstract

Public interest in the durability of household appliances may be traced back 40 years to criticism of planned obsolescence raised by an emerging consumer movement. A recent revival of interest in product life spans has taken place in the context of increasing waste generation and debate prompted by proposed producer responsibility legislation, but data on the age of discarded products and consumer attitudes to product life spans have been lacking. This paper draws upon recent data from research into discarded household appliances in the UK to enhance a theoretical model of product obsolescence and explore some implications for marketing and public policy. A survey of over 800 households provided quantitative data on consumer attitudes and behaviour relating to appliance life spans and a subsequent series of focus groups enriched this data with personal narratives. Respondents were evenly divided on whether or not appliance life spans are adequate. Variations in behaviour demonstrated how users may influence appliance life spans. Overall, the results suggest that consumers have an important role in reversing the trend toward increased appliance waste but currently face economic disincentives and lack adequate product information.

Keywords

Focus Group Marketing Public Policy Life Span Economic Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AEA Technology (1997). Recovery of WEEE: Economic and Environmental Impacts. Report produced for European Commission DG XI.Google Scholar
  2. Alpert, F., Wilson, B., Elliott, M. T. 1993Price signalling: Does it ever workJournal of Consumer Marketing10414Google Scholar
  3. Antonides, G. 1990The lifetime of a durable goodKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Box, J. M. F. 1983Extending product lifetime: Prospects and opportunitiesEuropean Journal of Marketing173449Google Scholar
  5. Conn, W. D. 1977Consumer product life extension in the context of materials and energy flows.Pearce, D. W.Walter, I. eds. Resource conservation: Social and economic dimensions of recyclingLongmanLondon127143Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, T. 1994aBeyond recycling: The longer life optionNew Economics FoundationLondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, T. 1994bThe durability of consumer durablesBusiness Strategy and the Environment,32330Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, T. 2000WEEE, WEEE, WEEE, WEEE, all the way homeEuropean Environment10121130Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, T., Mayers, K. 2000Prospects for household appliancesUrban MinesHalifaxGoogle Scholar
  10. Dardis, R., Gieser, N. 1980Price and quality of consumer goods: Are they more closely related in the seventies than in the sixtiesJournal of Consumer Policy4238248Google Scholar
  11. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2000). Waste strategy 2000 for England and Wales. London: TSO. Cm. 4693. Google Scholar
  12. Department of the Environment and the Welsh Office (1995). Making waste work: A strategy for sustainable waste management in England and Wales. London: HMSO. Cm 3040. Google Scholar
  13. Falkman, E. G. 1996Sustainable production and consumptionWorld Business Council for Sustainable DevelopmentGenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. Granberg, B. 1997The quality re-evaluation process: Product obsolescence in a consumer-producer interaction frameworkUniversity of Stockholm, Department of Economic HistoryStockholmGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanson, J. 1980A proposed paradigm for consumer product disposition processesJournal of Consumer Affairs144967Google Scholar
  16. Harrell, G. D., McConocha, D. M. 1992Personal Factors related to consumer product disposal tendenciesJournal of Consumer Affairs26397417Google Scholar
  17. Heiskanen, E. 1996Conditions for product life extensionNational Consumer Research Centre. Working Paper 23HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacoby, J., Berning, C., Dietvorst, T. F. 1977What about dispositionJournal of Marketing412228Google Scholar
  19. Kostecki, M. 1998The durable use of consumer products.KluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  20. McLaren, D., Bullock, S., Yousuf, N. 1998Tomorrow’s worldEarthscanLondonGoogle Scholar
  21. National Consumer Council (1989). The consumer guarantee. London: National Consumer Council. Google Scholar
  22. OECD (1982). Product durability and product-life extension. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Google Scholar
  23. Packard, V. 1960The waste makersPelicanHarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  24. Redclift, M. 1996Wasted: Counting the cost of global consumptionEarthscanLondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Robson, C. 1993Real world researchBlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Sproles, G. B. 1977New evidence on price and product qualityJournal of Consumer Affairs116377Google Scholar
  27. Stahel, W.R., Jackson, T. 1993Durability and optimal utilisation: Product-life extension in the service economy.LewisIn: T. Jackson (Ed.), Clean production strategies, pp. 262–291. Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  28. van Hinte, E. 1997Eternally yours: Visions on product endurance.010 PublishersRotterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. van Nes, N. 2003Replacement of durables: Influencing product lifetime through product designErasmus University. PhD thesisRotterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sustainable ConsumptionSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations