Constitutional Political Economy

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 247–280 | Cite as

Constitutional property rights protection and economic growth: evidence from the post-communist transition

  • Christian Bjørnskov
Original Paper


This paper seeks to estimate the economic growth effect of constitutional provisions for property rights protection. It does so using the unique situation in formerly communist countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the Caucasus where all but two introduced new constitutions after the fall of the Iron Curtain. The effects of implementing different constitutional provisions can therefore be observed in a group of countries with similar formal starting points. Estimates provide no evidence of positive effects and mainly point towards a negative conclusion: the introduction of constitutional protection of property rights is not associated with economic development in the long run, but tends to impose costs during a period of institutional transition and implementation proportional to the constitutional change.


Property rights Economic growth Constitutional political economy Transition 

JEL Classification

P16 P37 K40 O43 



The idea for the paper arose from discussions with Niclas Berggren, Nils Karlson and Stefan Voigt at a workshop at the Ratio Institute in Stockholm. The paper is part of the Ratio Institute Project “Property rights, the conditions for enterprise and economic growth”. Financial support from the Marcus and Amalia Wallenberg Memorial Fund Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. I thank Sebastian von Engelhardt, Jerg Gutmann, Daniel Halvorsson, Annamaria Kubovcikova, Niklas Potrafke, participants at the 2012 World Congress of the Public Choice Societies (Miami) and two referees at this journal for comments that improved the paper. Niclas Berggren deserves special mention for providing many important suggestions. Vilhelm Krag Bjørnskov provided able research assistance.


  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1A, pp. 385–472). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Aidt, T. (2003). Economic analysis of corruption: A survey. The Economic Journal, 113, F632–F652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aron, J. (2000). Growth and institutions: A review of the evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 15, 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asoni, A. (2008). Protection of property rights and growth as political equilibria. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 953–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R., & Gordon, D. B. (1982). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berggren, N., Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2012). The growth effects of institutional instability. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8, 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergh, A., & Henrekson, M. (2011). Government size and growth: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25, 872–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Combating corruption: On the interplay between institutional quality and social trust. Journal of Law and Economics, 54, 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bjørnskov, C., & Potrafke, N. (2011). Politics and privatization in Central and Eastern Europe: A panel data analysis. Economics of Transition, 19, 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (1998). Investment and institutional uncertainty: A comparative study of different uncertainty measures. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 134, 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruno, Giovanni S. F. (2005). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics Letters, 87, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57, 347–359.Google Scholar
  15. Dicey, A. V. (1885). An introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  16. Durnev, A. & Guriev, S. (2011). Expropriation risk and firm growth: A corporate transparency channel. Working Paper, Paris School of Economics.Google Scholar
  17. Ellickson, R. C. (1998). Law and economics discovers social norms. Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., & Melton, J. (2009). The endurance of national constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feld, L., & Voigt, S. (2003). Economic growth and judicial independence: Cross-country evidence using a new set of indicators. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foundation, H. (2012). 2012 Index of economic freedom: Promoting economic opportunity and prosperity. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  21. Freytag, A., & Voll, S. (2013). Institutions and savings in developing and emerging economies. Public Choice, 157, 475–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glaeser, E. L., la Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaeser, E. L., & Saks, R. E. (2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1053–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haggard, S., & Tiede, L. (2011). The rule of law and economic growth: Where are we? World Development, 39, 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty: Rules and order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2007). Explaining de facto judicial independence. International Review of Law and Economics, 27, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henisz, W. (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 355–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2011). Penn World Tables, Mark 7. Pennsylvania: Center for International Comparisons, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  29. ICL. (2011). International Constitutional Law. Database available at Accessed Sept 2011.
  30. Justesen, M. K. (2014). Better safe than sorry: How property rights and veto players jointly affect economic growth. Comparative Politics, 46, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008). Governance matters VII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2007. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Working Paper 4654.Google Scholar
  32. Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (1997). Why don’t poor countries catch up? A cross-national test of an institutional explanation. Economic Inquiry, 35, 590–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kingston, C., & Caballero, G. (2009). Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5, 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., & Justesen, M. K. (2013). Institutional interactions and economic growth: The joint effects of property rights, veto players and democratic capital. Public Choice, 157, 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Libman, A. (2010). Constitutions, regulations, and taxes: Contradictions of different aspects of decentralization. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melton, J., & Ginsburg, T. (2014). Does de jure judicial independence really matter? A reevaluation of explanations for judicial independence. Journal of Law and Courts, 2, 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Metelska-Szaniawska, K. (2009). Constitutions and economic reforms in transition: An empirical study. Constitutional Political Economy, 20, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metelska-Szaniawska, K. (2014). Economic effects of postsocialist constitutions (nearly) 25 years from the outset of transition. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the European Public Choice Society, Cambridge, April 3–6.Google Scholar
  41. North, D. C., & Weingast, B. (1989). Constitution and commitment: The evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History, 49, 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pitlik, H. (2002). The path of liberalization and economic growth. Kyklos, 55, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ríos-Figueroa, J., & Staton, J. K. (2014). An evaluation of cross-national measures of judicial independence. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 30, 104–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sager, L. G. (1978). The legal status of underenforced constitutional norms. Harvard Law Review, 91, 1212–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sonin, K. (2003). Why the rich may favor poor protection of property rights. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, 715–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. University of Richmond. (2011). Constitution finder. Online database at The University of Richmond School of Law; Accessed Oct 2011.
  48. Voigt, S. (1999). Implicit constitutional change—changing the meaning of the constitution without changing the text of the document. European Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Voigt, S. (2013). How (not) to measure institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Voigt, S., & Gutmann, J. (2013). Turning cheap talk into economic growth: On the relationship between property rights and judicial independence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Voigt, S., Gutmann, J., & Feld, L. P. (2014). Economic growth and judicial independence, a dozen years on: Cross-country evidence using an updated set of indicators. CESifo Working Paper 5010.Google Scholar
  52. Vreeland, J. R. (2008). The effect of political regime on civil war: Unpacking anocracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 401–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waldron, J. (2006). Are constitutional norms legal norms? Fordham Law Review, 75, 1697–1713.Google Scholar
  54. Whelan, D. J. (2010). Indivisibility of human rights: A history. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  55. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and BusinessAarhus UniversityAarhus VDenmark
  2. 2.Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations