Constitutional Political Economy

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 328–355 | Cite as

Incompatible institutions: socialism versus constitutionalism in India

Original Paper

Abstract

There has been a decline in rule of law in India, reflected in the frequent amendments to the Indian Constitution. This paper analyzes the historical, ideological, and economic context for constitutional amendments to understand the reason for the deterioration of constitutionalism in India. I argue that the formal institutions of socialist planning were fundamentally incompatible with the constraints imposed by the Indian Constitution. This incompatibility led to frequent amendments to the Constitution, especially in the area of Fundamental Rights. Consequently, pursuit of socialist policies gradually undermined the Constitution. The contradictory mixture of socialism and constitutionalism led to economic and political deprivations that were never intended by the framers. I demonstrate this incompatibility using evidence from five-year-plans and constitutional amendments in India.

Keywords

Indian Constitution Property rights Constitutional amendments Socialist planning Rule of law 

JEL Classification

B25 K100 K11 P37 

References

  1. Alcock Ashdown Company Limited (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, G. (1999). Working a democratic constitution: The Indian experience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer Undertakings) Act, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Ordinance, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. Bhagwati, J. (1993). India in transition: Freeing the economy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhagwati, J., & Desai, P. (1970). India: Planning for industrialization. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bihar Management of Estates and Tenures Act, 1949.Google Scholar
  8. Bose, F. (2010). Parliament vs. Supreme Court: A veto player framework of the Indian constitutional experiment in the area of economic and civil rights. Constitutional Political Economy, 21(4), 336–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boettke, P. J. (1995). Hayek’s road to serfdom revisited: Government failure in the argument against socialism. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  10. Chattopadhyay, K. (2010 [1944]). Presidential address all India women’s conference. In R. Guha (Ed.), Makers of modern India. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
  11. Coal Mines (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1973.Google Scholar
  12. Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973.Google Scholar
  13. Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. Constitution of India, 1950.Google Scholar
  16. Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951.Google Scholar
  17. Constitution (Third Amendment) Act, 1954.Google Scholar
  18. Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955.Google Scholar
  19. Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.Google Scholar
  20. Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act, 1964.Google Scholar
  21. Constitution (Twenty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1971.Google Scholar
  22. Constitution (Twenty-Fifth Amendment) Act, 1971.Google Scholar
  23. Constitution (Twenty-Sixth Amendment) Act, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972.Google Scholar
  25. Constitution (Thirty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1974.Google Scholar
  26. Constitution (Thirty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1975.Google Scholar
  27. Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act, 1976.Google Scholar
  28. Constitution (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976.Google Scholar
  29. Constitution (Forty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1978.Google Scholar
  30. Das, G. (2000). India unbound. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  31. Devasahayam, M. G. (2012). Emergency and India’s second freedom. New Delhi: Times Group Books.Google Scholar
  32. Dhavan, R. (1992). Nehru and the constitution. New Delhi: Indian Law Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Dicey, A. V. (1915). An introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
  34. Editorial. (1950). New York Times, January 26.Google Scholar
  35. Editorial. (1975). New York Times, December 28.Google Scholar
  36. Essential Commodities Act, 1955.Google Scholar
  37. Friedman, M. (2000). Friedman on India. New Delhi: Center for Civil Society.Google Scholar
  38. Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.Google Scholar
  39. Gandhi, I. (1969). Why nationalization. New Delhi: All India Radio.Google Scholar
  40. General Insurance Business Nationalization Act, 1972.Google Scholar
  41. Golwalkar, M. (2010 [1964]). Not socialism but Hindu Rashtra. In R. Guha (Ed.), Makers of modern India. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
  42. Golak Nath v State of Punjab (AIR 1967 SC 1643).Google Scholar
  43. Guha, R. (2007). India after Gandhi. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Guha, R. (2010). The Socialist Feminist. In R. Guha (Ed.), Makers of modern India. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
  45. Gwatkin, D. R. (1979). Political will and family planning: The implications of India’s emergency experience. Population and Development Review, 5(1), 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law legislation and liberty: Rules and order (Vol. I: Law legislation and liberty). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law legislation and liberty: The political order of a free people (Vol. III: Law legislation and liberty). Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hayek, F. A. (2011 [1960]). Constitution of liberty: The definitive edition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Indian Copper Corporation (Acquisition of Undertaking) Act, 1972.Google Scholar
  51. Indira Nehru Gandhi v Raj Narain (AIR 1975 SC 1461).Google Scholar
  52. Industrial Disputes Act, 1951.Google Scholar
  53. Industrial Policy Resolution, 1948.Google Scholar
  54. Industries (Development and Regulation) Act of 1951.Google Scholar
  55. IR Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu (AIR 2007 SC 861).Google Scholar
  56. Kameshwar Singh v The Province of Bihar (AIR 1950 Patna 392).Google Scholar
  57. Kashyap, S. C. (2010). Indian Constitution: Conflicts and controversies. New Delhi: Vitasta.Google Scholar
  58. Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala (AIR 1973 SC 1461).Google Scholar
  59. Khilnani, S. (1998). The idea of India. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  60. Lohia, R. (2010 [1964]). The caste system. In R. Guha (Ed.), Makers of modern India. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
  61. Manish, G. P. (2011). Central economic planning and India’s economic performance, 1951–1965. The Independent Review, 16(2), 199–219.Google Scholar
  62. Minerva Mills v Union of India (AIR 1980 SC 1789).Google Scholar
  63. Moscovitch, B. (2012). Harold Laski’s Indian students and the power of education, 1920–1950. Contemporary South Asia, 20(1), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.Google Scholar
  65. Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.Google Scholar
  66. Nehru, B. K. (1977). B. K. Nehru. In J. Abse (Ed.), In my LSE. London: Robson.Google Scholar
  67. Nehru, J. (1929). Soviet Russia: Some random sketches and impressions. Mumbai: Chetana.Google Scholar
  68. Nehru, J. (1946). The objectives resolution. Constituent assembly debates, December 13, 1946.Google Scholar
  69. Nehru, J. (1951). Parliamentary debate on First Amendment Bill. In L. S. Secratariat (Ed.) (Vol. 16, col. 8820, May 1951). New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secratariat.Google Scholar
  70. Nehru, J. (2004 [1936]). An autobiography. New Delhi: Penguin Book.Google Scholar
  71. Nehru, J. (2004 [1946]). The discovery of India. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  72. Palkhivala, N. A. (1974). Our constitution defaced and defiled. New Delhi: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Panagariya, A. (2004). Growth and reforms during 1980s and 1990s. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(25), 2581–2594.Google Scholar
  74. Panagariya, A. (2008). India: The emerging giant. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Planning Commission. (1951). First five year plan. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  76. Planning Commission. (1956). Second five year plan. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  77. Planning Commission. (1961). Third five year plan. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  78. Planning Commission. (1969). Fourth five year plan. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  79. Planning Commission. (1974). Fifth five year plan. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  80. Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953.Google Scholar
  81. R.C. Cooper v Union of India. (1970). 3 SCR 530.Google Scholar
  82. Rodrik, D., & Subramaniam, A. (2005). Hindu growth to productivity surge: The mystery of the Indian growth transition. IMFs Staff Papers, 52(2), 193–228.Google Scholar
  83. Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan (AIR 1965 SC 845).Google Scholar
  84. Shankari Prasad Singh v Union of India (AIR 1951 SC 458).Google Scholar
  85. Shenoy, B. R. (1969). A decade of planning in India: Second and third five-year plans, a commentary. Forum of Free Enterprise.Google Scholar
  86. Sick Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1972.Google Scholar
  87. Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974.Google Scholar
  88. Singh, J. (2006). Separation of powers and the erosion of the “right to property” in India. Constitutional political economy, 17(4), 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Singh, S. (1976). Report of the Committee Appointed by the Congress President to suggest amendments to the Constitution of India. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  90. Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976.Google Scholar
  91. Srinivasan, T. N. (2005). Comments on “From ‘Hindu growth’ to productivity surge: The mystery of the Indian growth transition. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(2), 229–233.Google Scholar
  92. State of West Bengal v Bela Banerjee (AIR 1954 SC 170).Google Scholar
  93. Subramanian, A. (2007). The evolution of institutions in India and its relationship with economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), 196–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Surya Pal Singh v State of UP (AIR 1951 All 674).Google Scholar
  95. Tamanaha, B. Z. (2006). On the rule of law: History, politics and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Thakurdas, P. (1945). A brief memorandum outlining a plan of economic development for India (2 vols.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  97. Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.Google Scholar
  98. Varma, A. (2008, February 4). Profit’s no longer a dirty word: The transformation of Indiahttp://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2008/Varmaprofit.html.
  99. Mises, L. (1922). Socialism: An economic and sociological analysis (J. Kahane, Trans., 2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  100. Waman Rao v Union of India (AIR 1981 SC 271).Google Scholar
  101. Webb, S., & Webb, B. (1920). A constitution for the socialist commonwealth of Great Britain. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  102. White, L. H. (2012). The clash of economic ideas. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsPurchase College, State University of New YorkPurchaseUSA

Personalised recommendations