Skip to main content

Politics as exchange: the classical liberal economics and politics of James M. Buchanan

Abstract

James Buchanan advocated the market mechanism for allocating resources because it is based on voluntary exchange. People engage in market transactions only when they believe they benefit from doing so. Buchanan depicted the political process the same way. People engage in collective activities to accomplish together ends that they would be unable to accomplish individually, or through bilateral exchange. Buchanan’s vision of politics as exchange is a normative framework for evaluating the rules within which political activity takes place. Rules that meet the criterion of agreement are desirable constitutional rules, and Buchanan recognized that not all government activity satisfies that criterion. Buchanan is the father of the subdiscipline of constitutional political economy, and his “politics as exchange” approach provides the foundation for much work in that area. Buchanan has created a foundation that is rich in ideas, but leaves behind a number of unanswered questions that point the way toward a further development of the research program in constitutional political economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. We note with some pride, as members of the Florida State University economics department, that Allen, Buchanan, and Colberg were all members of our department when they wrote that book.

  2. This passage is related to Buchanan’s (1969) book on the subjective nature of cost. One can never know what the results might have been of an option that was foregone.

  3. Buchanan (1990) depicts his constitutional political economy research program as analyzing the choice among constraints, contrasting it with models of individual behavior in which individuals make choices subject to constraints.

  4. Indeed, Hayek (1944) and Schumpeter (1947) both made arguments that people were consenting to give up their liberty.

References

  • Allen, C. L., Buchanan, J. M., & Colberg, M. R. (1954). Prices, incomes, and public policy: The ABC’s of economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1949). The pure theory of government finance: A suggested approach. Journal of Political Economy, 57(6), 496–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1954a). Social choice, democracy, and free markets. Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1954b). Individual choice in voting and the market. Journal of Political Economy, 62(4), 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1962a). Politics, policy, and the Pigouvian margins. Economica, 29, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1962b). The relevance of Pareto optimality. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6(4), 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choice: An inquiry in economic theory. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1977). Freedom in constitutional contract: Perspectives of a political economist. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1979). What should economists do?. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1990). The domain of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 1(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The soul of classical liberalism. The Independent Review, 5(1), 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Devletoglou, N. E. (1970). Academia in anarchy: An economic diagnosis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Musgrave, R. A. (1999). Public finance and public choice: Two contrasting visions of the State. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J., Holcombe, R., & Lawson, R. (2004). Economic freedom, institutional quality, and cross-country differences in income and growth. Cato Journal, 24(3), 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Hall, J. (2012). Economic freedom of the world: 2012 annual report. Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Holcombe, R. (1999). Economic freedom and the environment for economic growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(4), 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1950, orig. 1651). Leviathan. New York: E.P. Dutton.

  • Hochman, H. M., & Rodgers, J. D. (1969). Pareto optimal redistribution. American Economic Review, 59(41), 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R. G. (2011). Consent or coercion? A critical analysis of the constitutional contract. In A. Marciano (Ed.), Constitutional mythologies (pp. 9–23). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2011). James M. Buchanan. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1990). Buchanan on political economy: A review article. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(1), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (2nd ed.). London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1967). A new principle of just taxation. In R. A. Musgrave & A. T. Peacock (Eds.), Classics in the theory of public finance (pp. 92–118). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, L. B. (1985). Rights, contract, and utility in policy espousal. Cato Journal, 5(1), 259–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, L. B. (2001). Ethics as a social science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall G. Holcombe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gwartney, J.D., Holcombe, R.G. Politics as exchange: the classical liberal economics and politics of James M. Buchanan. Const Polit Econ 25, 265–279 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9165-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9165-z

Keywords

  • James Buchanan
  • Constitutional economics
  • Classical liberalism
  • Economic freedom
  • Politics as exchange
  • Public choice
  • JEL Classification
  • H1
  • H4