Under what conditions may social contracts arise? Evidence from the Hanseatic League

Abstract

Social contractarians commonly take social contracts to be solely hypothetical and refrain from elaborating on the factors that influence the feasibility of the formation of social contracts. In contrast, this paper aims at providing a discussion of the conditions affecting the feasibility of social contracts. I argue that the more aligned the preferences of group members for public goods are, the more the individuals share similar social norms, and the smaller the group is the more feasible a genuine social contract becomes. I provide evidence in support of my contention from the medieval Hanseatic League. At the Hanseatic Kontor in Novgorod, one of the four major trading posts of the Hanseatic League in cities outside of Germany, German merchants agreed to live under the rule of a constitution that gave rise to a political authority for the Kontor society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kontore throughout the text refers to the plural of Kontor.

  2. 2.

    Another variant of the social contract approach uses the state of a ‘natural distribution’ as starting point for the deliberation on the contractual stage; see for example Buchanan (1975) and Bush (1972).

  3. 3.

    Besides the four major Kontore the Hanseatic League had additional trading posts in foreign cities. The Kontore, however, represented the most important trading posts of the Hanseatic League. Since historians paid considerably more attention to the structure of the Kontore than to other trading posts, we have a fairly good understanding of the Kontore, whereas relatively little is known about other trading posts.

  4. 4.

    From roughly the middle of the 13th to the middle of the 14th century the Hanseatic League developed from an association of merchants into an association of towns (De Roover 1963, 111; Dollinger 1970, 45–61).

  5. 5.

    For a general introduction to the Hanseatic League see Dollinger (1970).

  6. 6.

    This holds especially true for Bergen and Novgorod, where the merchants lived on the Kontor’s premises. In London and in Bruges, the merchants did not live on the site of the Kontor and the German merchants intermingled with the native population.

  7. 7.

    Summer travelers arrived in Novgorod in spring after the ice gave the seaway to Novgorod free and left just before the ice made the voyage impossible. Winter travelers accordingly arrived in Novgorod shortly before the ice covered the passage to Novgorod.

  8. 8.

    Although officially a princedom, Novgorod was de facto governed by an oligarchic class of so-called Boyars. For details on Novgorod’s political system, see for example Johansen (1953).

  9. 9.

    The second condition concerning the absence of any political authority appears to be non-binding. It is imaginable that although a political authority is present all members of a society, including the political authority, agree to a social contract giving rise to a new political authority. A preexisting political authority therefore does not per se eliminate the possibility of designing a social contract. For a discussion of the influence of an existing political authority on the formation of a social contract see Sect. 4.

  10. 10.

    Kattinger (1999, 220) estimates that the first Skra was written around the year 1192.

  11. 11.

    Schlüter (1911b) provides the original text of seven versions of the constitution of the Kontor in Novgorod.

  12. 12.

    The preamble of the first Skra contains a reference to an approval of the Skra by ‘the wisest of all German cities’ (Schlüter 1911b, 58, author’s own translation from the original Middle Low German). The reference to the ‘wisest of all cities’ suggests that the extent copy was composed around 1270 in Visby, where merchants from several German cities formed a community (Schlüter 1911b, 8), and not that it was virtually approved by representatives from the wisest cities when it was first composed in the first half of the 13th century (Kattinger 1999, 217–219; Rennkamp 1977, 123).

  13. 13.

    Throughout the paper all references to the olderman of the Kontor refer to the ‘olderman of the court’.

  14. 14.

    One of the three known versions of the second edition of the constitution from 1298 (Schlüter 1911b, 18) mandated that the constitution be read to all the merchants of the Kontor twice a year—once for the summer travelers and once for the winter travelers (Schlüter 1911a, 26, b, 51).

  15. 15.

    See Holcombe (1994, 80–89) for a discussion of different definitions of government.

  16. 16.

    I consider the term ‘legitimate’ in Weber’s definition of government to indicate that despite the government’s official monopoly other members of society engage in physical force, which is then accordingly deemed ‘illegitimate’ by the established government.

  17. 17.

    Note that governments which were originally based on unanimous consent can turn into organizations that predate on those who initially consented to their creation. See Wagner (2007, 35) and the literature cited there for a discussion of the possibility that over time governments, which were originally created by unanimous consent, secure a dominant position in society not intended by those who participated in its creation.

  18. 18.

    If, as preferred by Holcombe (1994), the presence of coercive measures is considered to separate governments from clubs, due to its voluntary nature the Kontor society would have to be regarded as a club with a club leadership, which has extensive powers commonly associated with the characteristics of governments.

  19. 19.

    In the next known German-Russian trade agreement from 1259 the first mentioned participant on the German side is a representative from the city of Lübeck, followed by a representative of the German merchants frequenting Novgorod via Gotland and a representative of the Gotlandic merchants (Goetz 1916, 74). This change in the signers of the contract stands for the increase in influence of the Hanseatic Cities, especially Lübeck, over the affairs of Germans in Novgorod as elaborated on in Sect. 4.

  20. 20.

    Although the trade agreements between Russians and Germans and people from Gotland granted mutual freedoms, they were de facto privileges for the Germans (Goetz 1916, 68). The Russians’ level of international trade decreased from a very modest level in the 12th century to an even lower level during the 13th and 14th centuries, nearly vanishing completely (Johansen 1953, 130–131).

  21. 21.

    I understand norms to encompass all ‘rules of the game’ for social cooperation that are not provided for by a political authority. Whereby norms can emerge spontaneously through human interaction or be designed by individuals deliberately.

  22. 22.

    Voigt (1999) does not elaborate on further conditions for the establishment of constitutions.

  23. 23.

    Williamson (2009) provides empirical evidence for the claim that formal institutions are only effective when successfully embedded in a set of informal institutions.

  24. 24.

    For a discussion of the conditions under which either anarchy or the presence of a government is the efficient form of social organization for individual members of a society, see Leeson (2007a).

  25. 25.

    I assume here that the group is large enough to be able to produce public goods efficiently.

  26. 26.

    Without referring to any particular time period Rybina (2002, 240) states that the Kontor of Novgorod was dependent on the cities and problems concerning all businesses of the Kontor were discussed and resolved by the Hanseatic diet and the city diets of the Livland cities (especially Dorpat and Reval). If Rybina makes this statement also for the period before the first Hanseatic Diet in 1356, Rybina represents an exceptional opinion concerning the degree of independence of the Kontore. The development of the constitution itself suggests that the Kontore lost their independence over time and other historians argue that there was a time in which the Kontore were self-governed free of direct influence from any of the governing institutions of the Hanseatic cities (Gurland 1913; Zeller 2002; Angermann 1989, Szeftel 1958, 404; Johansen 1953, 138). Furthermore, Rybina (2001, 307), contradicting her dependence thesis, stresses the uniqueness of the isolated and closed settlement of the Germans in Novgorod.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aligica, P. D., & Boettke, P. J. (2009). Challenging institutional analysis and development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, T. L., & Hill, P. J. (2004). The Not so wild, wild west: Property rights on the frontier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angermann, N. (1989). Nowgorod—das Kontor im Osten. In J. Bracker, V. Henn, & R. Postel (Eds.), Die Hanse. Lebenswirklichkeit und Mythos (pp. 234–241). Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2008). Institutional stickiness and the new development economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(2), 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchanan, J. M. (1972). Before public choice. In G. Tullock (Ed.), Publications in the theory of anarchy (pp. 27–37). Blacksburg: Center for the Study of Public Choice.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buchanan, J. M. (1977). Freedom in constitutional contract. London: College Station.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bush, W. C. (1972). Individual welfare in anarchy. In G. Tullock (Ed.), Explorations in the theory of anarchy (pp. 5–18). Blacksburg: Center for the Study of Public Choice.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carpenter, J. P. (2007). Punishing free-riders: How group size affects mutual monitoring and the provision of public goods. Games and Economic Behavior, 60, 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Roover, R. (1963). The organization of trade. In M. M. Postan, E. E. Rich, & E. Miller (Eds.), The Cambridge economic history of europe (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Desmet, K., Ortuno-Ortin, I., & Wacziarg, R. (2009). The political economy of ethnolinguistic cleavages. NBER Working Paper No. 15360.

  16. Dollinger, P. (1970). The German Hansa. First published in 1964. (D. S. Ault & S. H. Steinberg, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  17. Dworkin, R. (1973). The original position. The University of Chicago Law Review, 40(3), 500–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ebel, W. (1950). Forschungen zur Geschichte des lübischen Rechts. I. Teil. Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ebel, W. (1954). Bürgerliches Rechtsleben zur Hansezeit in Lübecker Ratsurteilen. Göttingen: Musterschmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ebel, W. (1971). Lübisches Recht. Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goetz, L. K. (1916). Deutsch-Russische Handelsverträge des Mittelalters. Hamburg: Friederichsen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Groth, E. (1999). Das Verhältnis der livländischen Städte zum Novgoroder HanseKontor im 14. Jahrhundert. Hamburg: Baltische Gesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gurland, M. (1913). Der St. Peterhof zu Nowgorod (13611494). Innere Hofverhältnisse. Dissertation Göttingen.

  24. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hardin, R. (1989). Why a constitution? In B. Grofman & D. Wittman (Eds.), The federalist papers and the new institutionalism (pp. 100–120). New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heckathorn, D. D., & Maser, S. M. (1987). Bargaining and constitutional contracts. American Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Henn, V. (2008). Die Hansekontore und ihre Ordnungen. In A. Cordes (Ed.), Hansisches und hansestädtisches Recht (pp. 15–39). Trier: Porta Alba.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holcombe, R. G. (1994). The distinction between clubs and governments. In R. G. Holcombe (Ed.), The economic foundations of government (pp. 72–91). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Isaac, M. R., & Walker, J. M. (1988). Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contributions mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Isaac, M. R., Walker, J. M., & Williams, A. W. (1994). Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Johansen, P. (1953). Novgorod und die Hanse. In A. von Brandt & W. Koppe (Eds.), Städtewesen und Bürgertum als geschichtliche Kräfte (pp. 121–148). Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kalt, J. P. (1981). Public goods and the theory of government. Cato Journal, 1(2), 565–584.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kattinger, D. (1999). Die Gotländische Genossenschaft. Köln: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  35. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15(1), 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Leeson, P. T. (2007a). Efficient anarchy. Public Choice, 130(1–2), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Leeson, P. T. (2007b). An-arrgh-chy: The law and economics of pirate organization. Journal of Political Economy, 115(6), 1049–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Leeson, P. T. (2009). The calculus of piratical choice: The myth of the myth of the social contract. Public Choice, 139, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lopez, R. S. (1971). The commercial revolution of the middle ages (pp. 950–1350). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lowenberg, A. D., & Yu, B. T. (1992). Efficient constitutions formation and maintenance: The role of exit. Constitutional Political Economy, 3(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ordeshook, P. C. (1992). Constitutional stability. Constitutional Political Economy, 3(2), 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ordeshook, P. C. (2002). Are ‘Western’ constitutions relevant to anything other than the countries they serve? Constitutional Political Economy, 13(3), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(3), 223–251.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rennkamp, W. (1977). Studien zum deutsch-russischen Handel bis zum Ende des 13. Jahrhunderts, Nowgorod und Dünagebiet. Bochum: Studienverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rybina, E. (2001). “Frühe ‘Joint Ventures.’” Die Beziehungen Novgorods im Ostseeraum. In M. Müller-Wille et al. (Eds.), Novgorod. Das mittelalterliche Zentrum und sein Umland im Norden Russlands, (pp. 291–308). Neumünster.

  48. Rybina, E. (2002). Die hansischen Kaufleute in Novgorod. Ihre Lebensumstände und ihre Beziehungen zu den Einwohnern der Stadt. In R. Hammel-Kiesow (Ed.), Vergleichende Ansätze in der hansischen Geschichtsforschung (pp. 237–245). Trier: Porta Alba.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schlüter, W. (1911a). Die Nowgoroder Schra in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung vom 13. bis zum 17. Jh. Dorpat: Mattiesen.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schlüter, W. (1911b). Die Nowgoroder Schra in sieben Fassungen vom XIII. bis XVII. Jahrhundert. Dorpat: Mattiesen.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schubert, B. (2002a). Hansische Kaufleute im Novgoroder Handelskontor. In N. Angermann & K. Friedland (Eds.), Novgorod. Markt und Kontor der Hanse (pp. 79–95). Köln: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schubert, E. (2002b). Novgorod, Brügge, Bergen und London: Die Kontore der Hanse. Concilium Medii Aevi, 5, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Skarbek, D. (2011). Putting the ‘Con’ into constitutions: The economics of prison gangs. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26(2), 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Szeftel, M. (1958). La condition légale des étrangers dans la Russie Novgorodo-Kievienne. Recueils de la Société Jean Bodin, 10, 375–430.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Voigt, S. (1999). Breaking with the notion of social contract: Constitutions as based on spontaneously arisen institutions. Constitutional Political Economy, 10, 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wagner, R. E. (2007). Fiscal sociology and the theory of public Finance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Williamson, C. R. (2009). Informal institutions rule: Institutional arrangements and economic performance. Public Choice, 139(3), 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zeller, A. (2002). Der Handel Deutscher Kaufleute im mittelalterlichen Novgorod. Hamburg.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Simon Bilo, Peter Boettke, Nicholas Curott, Harry David, Stewart Dompe, Thomas Hogan, Ole Jürgens, Peter Leeson, William Luther, Adam Martin, Douglas Rogers, David Skarbek, Daniel Smith, Nicholas Snow, Virgil Storr, Elif Uncu, Lawrence White, and participants of the Southern Economics Association Meetings 2009 for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. The standard disclaimer applies. He gratefully acknowledges generous research support from the Mercatus Center.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Fink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fink, A. Under what conditions may social contracts arise? Evidence from the Hanseatic League. Const Polit Econ 22, 173–190 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-010-9099-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social contracts
  • Constitutions
  • Hanseatic League
  • Trading posts
  • Kontor

JEL Classification

  • D71
  • H41
  • N43