Constitutional Political Economy

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 231–248 | Cite as

Regulation and shadow economy: empirical evidence for 25 OECD-countries

Original Paper


New empirical findings for the impact of regulations on economic activities in the shadow economy are presented here. A comprehensive regulation index covering major fields (e.g. labour and product market regulation and the quality of institutions) has been used to analyze the relationship between the density of regulations and the size of shadow economies. The empirical results from 25 OECD countries for the time period 1995–2005 show that—apart from tax burden and tax moral—main causes for the development of the size of shadow economies are labour and product market regulations, overall regulations and poor quality of official public institutions and administration. These findings can provide additional information on policy measures to tackle the problem of growing shadow economies.


Regulation Quality of institutions Shadow economy Underground economy Random effects models 

JEL Classification

O17 K42 J22 H26 


  1. Addison, J. T., & Teixeira, P. (2003). The economics of employment protection. Journal of Labor Research, 24(1), 85–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajada, C., & Schneider, F. (2005). Size, causes and consequences of the underground economy. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, H., & Daninger, S. (2005). Labor and product market deregulation: Partial, sequential, or simultaneous reform? IMF Working Papers 05/227, International Monetary Fund, Washington.Google Scholar
  4. Boockmann, B., & Rincke, J. (2005). Wirksamkeit der Bekämpfung der Schwarzarbeit durch die “Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit” – empirische Untersuchung der Entwicklung der Schwarzarbeit und des hierauf bezogenen Bewusstseins- und Wertwandels – Machbarkeitsstudie. Berlin: BMF.Google Scholar
  5. Botero, J., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shliefer, A. (2004). The regulation of labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1339–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouev, M. (2005). State regulations, job search and wage bargaining: A study in the economics of the informal sector. Working paper Nr. 764, William Davidson Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  7. Conway, P., & Nicoletti, G. (2006). Product market regulation in the non-manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: Measurements and highlights. OECD Working Papers, Nr. 530, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Conway, P., Janod, V., & Nicoletti, G. (2005). Product market regulation in OECD countries: 1998 to 2003. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Nr. 419, Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, S. J., & Henrekson, M. (2005). Tax effects on work activity, industry mix and shadow economy size: Evidence from rich country comparison. In R. Gomez Salvador et al. (Eds.), Labour supply and incentives to work in Europe (pp. 44–111). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. de Soto, H. (1989). The other path. New York: Harpercollins.Google Scholar
  11. Enste, D. H. (2005). The shadow economy in OECD and EU accession countries– empirical evidence for the influence of institutions, liberalization, taxation and regulation. In C. Bajada & F. Schneider (Eds.), Size, causes and consequences of the underground economy. Hants.Google Scholar
  12. Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2006a). IW-Regulierungsindex: Methode, Analyse und Ergebnisse eines internationalen Vergleichs, IW-Analyse Nr. 16, Köln.Google Scholar
  13. Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2006b). Regulierung, Arbeitsplatzsicherheit und Wohlbefinden, iw-trends 4/2006. Köln.Google Scholar
  14. Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2007). Regulierung und Schattenwirtschaft, iw-trends 1/2007. Köln.Google Scholar
  15. Enste, D. H., & Hardege, S. (2008). Regulierung, Wohlstand und Beschäftigung – Eine empirische Wirkungsanalyse für 22 OECD-Länder. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 55, 819–838. Wien.Google Scholar
  16. Enste, D. H., & Schneider, F. (Eds.) (2006). Jahrbuch Schattenwirtschaft 2006/2007. Muenster: LIT-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. EU-Commission. (2004). Undeclared work in an enlarged union. Brussels: Regioplan.Google Scholar
  18. EU-Commission. (2007). Undeclared work in the european union. Brussels: Special Eurobarometer 67.3.Google Scholar
  19. Feld, L. P., & Larsen, C. (2006). Strafen, Kontrollen und Schwarzarbeit: Einige Anmerkungen auf Basis von Befragungsdaten für Deutschland. In Edited Volume „Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.Google Scholar
  20. Fetchenhauer, D., Gresser, F., & Haferkamp, A. (2006). Ein Volk von Betrügern? Schwarzarbeit, Steuerhinterziehung und Versicherungsmissbrauch aus psychologischer Sicht. In Edited Volume “Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.Google Scholar
  21. Fraser Institute. (2004). Economic freedom of the world 2004. Vancouver: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. (1984). The hidden economy: State and prospect for measurement. Review of Income and Wealth, 30(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Weck-Hannemann, H. (1984). The hidden economy as an “unobserved” variable. European Economic Review, 26(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (2000). Dodging the grabbing hand: The determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 459–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grupp, H., & Mogee, M. E. (2004). Indicators for national science and technology policy: How robust are composite indicators? Research Policy, 33(9), 1373–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hafemann, K., & van Suntum, U. (2004). Internationales Standort-Ranking 2004. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  27. Heritage Foundation (2005). Index of economic freedom. Washington.Google Scholar
  28. Institute for Management Development (IMD). (2004). World competitiveness yearbook 2004. Lausanne.Google Scholar
  29. International Monetary Fond (IMF). (2004). Annual report on exchange arrangements and exchange restrictions. Washington: IMF.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Shleifer, A. (1997). The unofficial economy in transition. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1998). Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 387–392.Google Scholar
  32. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996-2002. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kazemier, B. (2006). Monitoring the underground economy- a survey of methods and estimates. In Edited Volume „Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.Google Scholar
  34. Kirchgässner, G. (2006). Steuermoral und Schwarzarbeit. In Edited Volume „Shadow Economy 2006/2007”. Münster.Google Scholar
  35. Kladroba, A. (2005). Methodische Einflüsse auf die Ergebnisse von Rankings. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 56, 95–111.Google Scholar
  36. Körner, M., & Strotmann, H. (2006). Steuermoral – Das Spannungsfeld von Freiwilligkeit und Regelverstoß durch Steuerhinterziehung. Tübingen: IAW.Google Scholar
  37. Loayza, N. V., & Rigolini, J. (2006). Informality trends and cycles, Policy Research Working Paper Series 4078, The World Bank, Washington.Google Scholar
  38. Loayza, N., Oviedo, A. M., & Serven, L. (2006). The impact of regulation on growth and informality cross-country evidence. In B. Guha-Khasnobis, R. Kanbur, & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Linking the formal and informal economy, concepts and policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nardo, M., Giovannini, E., Hoffman, A., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, OECD Statistics Working Paper, Nr. 3., OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  40. Nicoletti, G., & Pryor, F. L. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of governmental regulations in OECD nations. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 59, 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2005). Product market reforms and employment in OECD countries. In OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Nr. 472. Paris.Google Scholar
  42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1997). The OECD report on regulatory reform, volume II: Thematic studies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  43. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1999). OECD employment outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). Measuring the non-observed economy. A handbook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). OECD employment outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  46. Renooy, P., Ivarsson, S., Wusten-Gritsai, O., & van der Meijer, R. (2004). Undeclared work in an enlarged Union - an analysis of undeclared work. An in-depth study of specific items. Final report. Brüssel.Google Scholar
  47. Schneider, F. (2005). Shadow economies around the world: What do we really know? European Journal of Political Economy, 21(3), 598–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 77–114.Google Scholar
  49. Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2002). The shadow economy. An international survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schneider, F., & Pöll, G. (1999). Schattenwirtschaft. In Handbuch der Wirtschaftsethik (pp. 382–432). Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlageshaus.Google Scholar
  51. Tanzi, V. (1999). Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Economic Journal, 109(June), 338–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thießen, U. (2003). The impact of fiscal policy and deregulation on the shadow economies in transition countries: The case of Ukranie. Public Choice, 114, 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas, J. J. (1992). Informal economic activity. New York, London u.a. (Harvester/Weatsheaf).Google Scholar
  54. Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2007). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2541.Google Scholar
  55. World Bank. (2004). Doing business report. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  56. World Bank. (2005). Doing business report. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  57. World Bank. (2006). Doing business report. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  58. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2004). The global competitiveness report 2004–2005. Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cologne Institute for Economic ResearchCologneGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  3. 3.University of Applied Science-CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations