Skip to main content
Log in

“Deja Vu All Over Again:” Constitutional Economics and European legal Integration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing theories of regional integration do not satisfactorily explain European legal integration. Like the bears’ porridge, one explains too much, another too little, and yet another requires unnecessary information. Constitutional economics, viewing regional integration as a process producing a constitution, is able to explain both momentum toward and resistance to legal integration in a parsimonious fashion. Further, it produces a unique analysis of the current circumstances of European legal integration, revealing that the Kompetenz–Kompetenz debate addresses the fundamental dilemma of compound republics. This also discloses that European integration has produced a novel answer to this old question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The differences between this statement and a neofunctionalist perspective will become clearer below.

  2. Craig and de Burca (1998) report that the Conseil d’Etat “appeared to accept the premises” of the comissaire’s argument (based on Article 55), though it adopted the conclusion without stating its reasoning.

  3. Usually abbreviated “BVerfG” to avoid confusion with the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, the Federal Administrative Court. Since the latter does not appear outside of this footnote, the simpler abbreviation is used.

  4. Known as the contrary act doctrine.

  5. “Fundamental rights” and “basic rights” are different translations of the same German word, Grundrechte.

  6. SpA Granital v. Amministrazione delle Finanze.

  7. Interestingly, the sole instance in which the ECJ has refused to expand the scope of supranational authority is in regards to the proposed accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights, which coincidentally would have subjected EU law (and ECJ decisions) to the scrutiny of the European Court of Human Rights.

  8. To the author’s knowledge.

  9. Neoliberal institutional consciously borrows the concept of hegemon and fundamental assumptions about its behavior from neorealism; indeed, the concept of hegemon would retain very little meaning once separated from those assumptions.

  10. For more on this in the individual case, see Hobbes and Locke.

  11. For more on this as regards individuals, see Buchanan (1993).

  12. For more on this, see Griffith (2001).

References

  • Aranson, P. H. (1991). Calhoun’s constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy, 2(1), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backer, L. C. (1998). Forging federal systems within a matrix of contained conflict: The example of the European union. Emory International Law Review, 12(3), http://www.law.emory.edu/EILR/volumes/fall98/backer.html. Accessed October 1999.

  • Blankart, C. B. (2000). The process of government centralization: A constitutional view. Constitutional Political Economy, 11(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boom, S. J. (1995). The European Union after the Maastricht Decision: Is Germany the ‘Virginia of Europe’? http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs//JeanMonnet/papers/95/9505ind.html. Accessed December 1999.

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1993). Property as a guarantor of liberty. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1965). The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht (1993). Brunner et al. v. The European Union Treaty (Cases 2 BvR 2134/92 and 2159/92), Judgment of 12 October 1993. As excerpted in Common Market Law Review, 31(2), 251–262.

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht (1992). Eurocontrol I (Cases 2 BvR 1107, 1124/77 and 195/79), Judgment of 23 June 1981. In Decisions of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (pp. 399–416). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht (1992). European Community Regulations (Cases 1 BvR 248/63 and 216/67), Judgment of 18 October 1967. In Decisions of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (pp. 182–186). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht (1992). Solange I (Case 2 BvL 52/71), Judgment of 29 May 1974. In Decisions of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (pp. 270–283). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht (1992). Solange II (Case 2 BvR 197/83), Judgment of 22 October 1986. In Decisions of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (pp. 613–633). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Burley, A.-M. S. (1993). International law and international relations theory: A dual agenda. American Journal of International Law, 87(April), 205–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, A.-M., & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the court: A political theory of legal integration. International Organization, 47(1), 41–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, G. A., & Gibson, J. L. (1995). The legitimacy of the court of justice in the European union: Models of institutional support. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. C. (1953). Disquisition on government and selections from the discourse. In C. Gordon Post (Ed.), New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

  • Calhoun, J. C. (1993). Union and liberty: The writings of John C. Calhoun. In Ross M. Lence (Ed.), Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

  • Carr, E. H. (1964). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919–1939. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R., (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, P., & de Burca, G. (1998). EU law: text, cases, and materials. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J., & Weingast, B. R. (Eds.). (1997). The new federalism: Can the states be trusted?. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

  • Gesetz zur Änderung des Grundgestetzes (1992). Bundesgesetzblatt 1992 s. 2086, http://www.jura.uni-sb.de/BGBl/TEIL1/1992/19922086.1.HTML, accessed May 1, 2001.

  • Grieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: A realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. In: R. J. Beck, A. C. Arend & R. D. Vander Lugt (eds). 1996. International rules: Approaches from international law and international relations. New York: Oxford University Press pp. 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, J.M. (1996). State interests and institutional rule trajectories: A neorealist interpretation of the maastricht treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union. Security Studies, 5(1), 261–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, Nathan D. (2001). The sword and the code: Competing images of international law. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 19–22, 2001.

  • Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1987). The federalist papers. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdegen, M. (1994). Maastricht and the German constitutional court: Constitutional restraints for an ‘ever closer union’. Common Market Law Review, 31(2), 235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan. In E. Curley (Ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., Inc.

  • Inman, R. P., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1997). Rethinking federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llorente, F. R. (1998). Constitutionalism in the ‘Integrated’ States of Europe. http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs//JeanMonnet/papers/98/98-5-.html. Accessed December 1999.

  • Locke, J. (1952). The second treatise of government. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryman, J. H. (1985). The civil law tradition: An introduction to the legal systems of Western Europe and Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, S. C. (1998). European legal personality disorder: The union’s legal nature through the prism of the German federal constitutional court’s Maastricht decision. Emory International Law Review, 12(3), http://www.law.emory.edu/EILR/volumes/fall98/monaghan.html. Accessed November 1999.

  • Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the single European act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European community. International Organization, 45(1), 19–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, P. C. (1992). Constitutional stability. Constitutional Political Economy, 3(2), 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, V. (1987). The political theory of a compound republic. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. (1996). Statistical political philosophy and positive political theory. In: F. Jeffrey (ed.), The rational choice controversy: Economic models of politics reconsidered. New Haven: Yale University Press. pp. 213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein , E. (1981). Lawyers, judges, and the making of a transnational constitution. American Journal of International Law, 75(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991). Neofunctionalism: Obstinate or obsolete? A reappraisal in the light of the new dynamism of the Ec. Millennium, 20(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler H. (1961). The political safeguards of federalism, in H. Wechsler (ed.), Principles, politics, and fundamental law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 49–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J. H. H. (1999). The constitution of europe: “do the new clothes have an emperor?” and other essays on European integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J. H. H. (1994). A quiet revolution: The European court of justice and its interlocutors. Comparative Political Studies, 26(4), 510–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J. H. H., & Fries, S. C. (1999). A human rights policy for the European community and union: The question of competences. http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/JeanMonnet/papers/99/990401.html, December 1999.

  • Weingast, B. (1993). Constitutions as governance structures: The political foundations of secure markets. Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics, 149, 286–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. (1995). The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J. (1997). “The Judicial Safeguards of Federalism.” 70 Southern California Law Review 1311, http://www.law.berkeley.edu/faculty/yooj/articles/federalism.html. Accessed May 10, 2000.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Clark Gibson, Cameron Theis, and participants at the 2001 Southern Political Science Association for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan D. Griffith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffith, N.D. “Deja Vu All Over Again:” Constitutional Economics and European legal Integration. Constit Polit Econ 17, 15–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-006-6791-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-006-6791-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation