A hybrid model for a multiproduct pipeline planning and scheduling problem
- 259 Downloads
Brazilian petrobras is one of the world largest oil companies. Recurrently, it faces a very difficult planning and scheduling problem: how to operate a large pipeline network in order to adequately transport oil derivatives and biofuels from refineries to local markets. In spite of being more economical and environmentally safer, the use of a complex pipeline network poses serious operational difficulties related to resource allocation and temporal constraints. The current approaches known from the literature only consider a few types of constraints and restricted topologies, hence they are far from being applicable to real instances from petrobras. We propose a hybrid framework based on a two-phase problem decomposition strategy. A novel Constraint Programming (CP) model plays a key role in modelling operational constraints that are usually overlooked in literature, but that are essential in order to guarantee viable solutions. The full strategy was implemented and produced very adequate results when tested over large real instances.
KeywordsConstraints Scheduling Oil pipeline
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.5th International Planning Competition (2006). http://zeus.ing.unibs.it/ipc-5/.
- 2.Alves, V., & Filho, V. J. (2007). Pipeline scheduling of petroleum derivatives using genetic algorithm. In IV Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Petróleo e Gás. Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
- 4.Camponogara, E. (1995). A-Teams para um problema de transporte de derivados de petróleo. Master’s thesis, Instituto de Matemática, Estatística e Ciência da Computação, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. In Portuguese.Google Scholar
- 5.Camponogara, E., & Souza, P. S. (1996). A-Teams for oil transportation problem through pipelines. In Information systems analysis and synthesis. Orlando, United States.Google Scholar
- 7.Crane, D. S., Wainwright, R. L., & Schoenefeld, D. A. (1999). Scheduling of multi-product fungible liquid pipelines using genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the 1999 ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 280–285). San Antonio, USA.Google Scholar
- 8.de la Cruz, J., Andrés-Toro, B., Herrán-González, A., Porta, E. B., & Blanco, P.F. (2003). Multiobjective optimization of the transport in oil pipelines networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (Vol. 1, pp. 566–573).Google Scholar
- 10.Filho, E. M. S., Filho, V. J., & de Lima, L. S. (2007). Variable neighborhood search (VNS) applied to pipeline distribution problem with capacity constraints. In IV Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Petróleo e Gás. Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
- 11.Group, A. E. (2001). How pipelines make the oil market work—their networks, operation and regulation. New York: Association of Oil Pipe Lines.Google Scholar
- 12.Hooker, J. N. (2006). Integrated methods for optimization (International series in operations research & management science). Secaucus: Springer.Google Scholar
- 13.ILOG (2006). ILOG scheduler 6.2: User’s manual. ILOG.Google Scholar
- 14.Kautz, H., Horvitz, E., Ruan, Y., Gomes, C., & Selman, B. (2002). Dynamic restarts policies. In Proceedings of the AAAI-2002. Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
- 17.Marriot, K., & Stuckey, P. (1998). Programming with constraints: An introduction (1st ed.). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- 18.Milidíu, R., & dos Santos Liporace, F. (2003). Planning of pipeline oil transportation with interface restrictions is a difficult problem. Tech. rep. 56, Departamento de Informática, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Google Scholar
- 19.Milidíu, R., dos Santos Liporace, F., & de Lucena, C. J. P. (2003). Pipesworld: Planning pipeline transportation of petroleum derivatives. In Proceedings of ICAPS’03—Workshop on the competition: Impact, organization, evaluation, benchmarks. Trento, Italy.Google Scholar
- 22.Moura, A., de Souza, C., Cire, A., & Lopes, T. (2008). Heuristics and constraint programming hybridizations for a real pipeline planning and scheduling problem. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE international conference on computational science and engineering—CSE’08 (pp. 455–462).Google Scholar
- 23.Moura, A., de Souza, C., Cire, A., & Lopes, T. (2008). Planning and scheduling the operation of a very large oil pipeline network. In Lecture notes in computer science—proceedings of the 14th international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming (Vol. 5202, pp. 36–51).Google Scholar
- 25.Rejowski, R., & Pinto, J. M. (2004). Efficient MILP formulations and valid cuts for multiproduct pipeline scheduling. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28(8), 1511–1528.Google Scholar
- 27.Relvas, S., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D., Matos, H. A., Fialho, J., & Pinheiro, A. S. (2006). Pipeline scheduling and distribution centre management—A real-world scenario at CLC. In Proceedings of the 16th European symposium on computer aided process engineering and 9th international symposium on process systems engineering (pp. 2135–2140). Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.Google Scholar
- 31.Wilson, R. (2001). Transportation in America (18th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Eno Transportation Foundation.Google Scholar