Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling of Environmental-Economic Indicators of Regional Development

  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

One of the current topical problems is the prediction of climate change and mitigation of its consequences. All-sided analysis of ecological, economic, and social aspects of climate issues relies on interdisciplinary assessment models. This article adapts the MERGE optimization model to the current state of the world economy and introduces into the model a new component that implements a simplified procedure of “green” GDP calculation (“green” GDP, or GGDP, provides information about the efficiency of use of environmental resources). The objective of our numerical simulations is to tests the consequences of Russia’s hypothetical participation in the program for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to analyze the environmental indicators of Russia’s GDP. The input data are mainly provided by the project of scenario conditions and main macroeconomic parameters for the forecasting of socio-economic development in Russia in the near future implemented by the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. The calculations reveal the existence of reserves for Russia’s “painless” participation in environment-preserving initiatives that call for not exceeding the 1990 emission level in 2020–2025. At the same time, increasing the environmental efficiency of Russia’s GDP is a relevant task that requires immediate attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Climate Doctrine of the Russian Federation [in Russian] [http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/6365].

  2. A. O. Korotin, I. G. Gritsevich, and G. V. Safonov, Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol: The Reality and Practical Options [in Russian], World Wild Life Foundation (WWF)-Russia (2004).

  3. A. Manne, R. Mendelsohn, and R. Richels, “MERGE — a Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GHG reduction policies,” Energy Policy, 23, No. 2, 17–34 (1995).

  4. A. Kryazhimsky, Ya. Minullin, and L. Schrattenholzer, “Global long-term energy-economy-environment scenarios with an emphasis on Russia,” Perspectives in Energy Journal, 9, 119–137 (2005).

  5. B. Digas and V. Rozenberg, “Application of an optimization model to studying some aspects of Russia’s economic development,” Int. J. Environ. Policy Decision Making, 1, No. 1, 51–63 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. V. Digas and V. L. Rozenberg, “Comprehensive estimation model of MERGE: Adaptation to current state of world economy,” Economy of Region, No. 3, 281–290 (2013) [https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84979726261&origin=resultslist&sid=400cd4242aca1dc29f4fcb4e16222994].

  7. J. P. Weyant, “Integrated assessment of climate change: an overview and comparison of approaches and results,” in: J. P. Bruce, H. Lee, and E. F. Haites, eds., Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press (1996).

  8. T. Rutherford, “Sequential joint maximization,” in: J. P. Weyant, ed., Energy and Environmental Policy Modeling, Kluwer, Norwell, MA (1999), pp. 139–175.

  9. S. N. Bobylev, V. S. Minakov, S. V. Solov’eva, and V. V. Tret’yakov, Environmental-Economic Index of Russia’s Regions [in Russian], World Wild Life Foundation (WWF)-Russia (2012).

  10. O. A. Veklich and N. Yu. Shlapak, “Environmentally corrected GDP as a measure of real economic development,” Problemy Prognozirovaniya, No. 3, 48–54 (2012).

  11. \( \overset{\frown }{\mathrm{S}} \)ystem of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Central Framework, United Nations, New York (2014) [http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/SEEA CF Final en.pdf].

  12. Federal Service of State Statistics (Rosstat) [http:/www.gks.ru].

  13. Unified Inter-Departmental Information-Statistical System (EMISS) [http://www.fedstat.ru].

  14. World Development Indicators 2012, The World Bank [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6014].

  15. International Energy Outlook IEO-2014, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) [http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/].

  16. The World Factbook 2013–2015, U.S. Central Intelligence Agency [http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/].

  17. Scenario Conditions, Main Parameters for the Forecasting of Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation . . . for 2016 and for the planning period 2017 and 2018 [in Russian], Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, Moscow (2015) [http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/macro/prognoz/].

  18. A Forecast of Development of the Energy Sector in the World and in Russia to 2040 [in Russian], Institute of Energy Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Analytical Center of the Government of the Russian Federation (2014) [http://ineiran.ru/articles/prognoz-2030.pdf].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Dinamicheskogo Upravleniya, No. 7, 2016, pp. 20–33.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Digas, B.V., Rozenberg, V.L. Modeling of Environmental-Economic Indicators of Regional Development. Comput Math Model 28, 550–560 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10598-017-9380-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10598-017-9380-3

Keywords

Navigation