Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pilot Study of the Cost-Effectiveness of Youth F-ACT in the Netherlands

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mental healthcare costs are rising. Community-based interventions often are being implemented without sufficient evidence for the effectiveness in terms of care and cost. In this pilot study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of youth Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (F-ACT) compared to treatment as usual (TAU). In total 28 adolescents (12–18 years) participated in F-ACT (N = 13) and TAU (N = 15). The outcome measures were the percentage of adolescents with a significant improvement in quality of life and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Costs were measured using a retrospective cost-questionnaire. Outcomes were assessed at the start and after three months of care. Compared to TAU, F-ACT resulted in a significantly higher quality of life as reported by adolescents. There was no significant difference in quality of life reported by the parents. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) demonstrated that youth F-ACT is more effective but with higher costs. This study may help to make evidence-based decisions in terms of who benefits the most from youth F-ACT interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig.3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bak, M., van Os, J., Delespaul, P., Bie, A., Campo, J., Poddighe, G., & Drukker, M. (2007). An observational, ‘real life’ trial of the introduction of assertive community treatment in a geographically defined area using clinical rather than service use outcome criteria. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-006-0147-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bak, M., Drukker, M., De Bie, A., Campo, J., Poddighe, G., Van Os, J., & Delespaul, P. (2008). Een observationele trial naar ‘assertive outreach’ met remissie als uitkomstmaat. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie, 50(5), 253–262.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, A. H., Liu, B., Ullman, S., Jadback, I., & Engstrom, K. (2016). Children’s quality of life based on the KIDSCREEN-27: Child self-report, parent ratings and child-parent agreement in a Swedish random population sample. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0150545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernert, S., Fernández, A., Haro, J. M., König, H., Alonso, J., Vilagut, G., & Mhedea, E. (2009). Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in, three European countries. Value in Health, 12(5), 750–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodden, D. H. M., Dirksen, C. D., & Bögels, S. M. (2008). Societal burden of clinically anxious youth referred for treatment: A cost-of-illness study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(4), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9194-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Mueser, K. T. (2001). Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness. Critical ingredients and impact on patients. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 36, 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwmans, C., De Jong, K., Timman, R., Zijlstra-Vlasveld, M., Van der Feltz-Cornelis, C., Tan Swan, S., & Hakkaart-van Roijen, L. (2013). Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 217. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Broersen, M., Kroon, J., Creemers, D., & Frieswijk, N. (2019). Youth F-ACT: Evaluating psychosocial functioning of adolescents in treatment and associations between model fidelity and treatment outcome. Unpublished manuscript Trimbos-instituut, Utrecht University, Netherlands.

  • Broersen, M., Creemers, D. H. M., Frieswijk, N., Vermulst, A. A., & Kroon, H. (2020). Investigating the critical elements and psychosocial outcomes of youth flexible assertive community treatment: A study protocol for an observational prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busschbach, J. Van, & Hout, B. Van. (n.d.). QALY en kwaliteit van leven metingen.

  • Central Bureau for Statistics. (2019). Statistics Netherlands. Retrieved from https://opendata.cbs.nl/#/CBS/nl/dataset/84134NED.htm.

  • den Otter, J., Verschuur, F., & Schell, P. (2009). Community treatment ook voor jeugd? Tijdschrift Sociale Psychiatrie, 28(89), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drukker, M., Maarschalkerweerd, M., Bak, M., Driessen, G., à Campo, J., de Bie, A., & Delespaul, P. (2008). A real-life observational study of the effectiveness of FACT in a Dutch mental health region. BMC Psychiatry, 8, 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Drukker, M., Visser, E., Sytema, S., & van Os, J. (2013). Flexible assertive community treatment, severity of symptoms and psychiatric health service use, a real life observational study. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 9, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901309010202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, M. F., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forti, A., Nas, C., Geldrop, A. Van, Franx, G., Petrea, I., Strien, & Y. Van, Jeurissen, P. (2014). OECD Health Working Paper 73 Mental Health Analysis Profiles (MhAP’s) Netherlands, (6), 90.

  • Gold, M., Siegel, J., Russell, L., et al. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakkaart-van Roijen, L., Van der Linden, N., Bouwmans, C., Kanters, T., & Tan, S. S. (2015). Kostenhandleiding: Methodologie van kostenonderzoek en referentieprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg.

  • Hunsley, J. (2002). The Cost-Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions. Ottawa: Canadian Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, I. E., Kann, D., van den Berg, G., Dirksen, C. D., Hiligsmann, M., & Evers, S. M. (2016). Welke jeugdinterventies in Nederland zijn kosteneffectief ?.Systematische literatuurreview naar de huidige stand van zaken.

  • Lamers, L. M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Krabbe, P. F. M., & Busschbach, J. J. V. (2006). The Dutch tariff: Results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics, 15(10), 1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M., & Lockwood, A. (2011). WITHDRAWN: Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001089.pub2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matza, L. S., Secnik, K., Mannix, S., & Sallee, F. R. (2005). Parent-proxy EQ-5D ratings of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in the US and the UK. Pharmacoeconomics, 23(8), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523080-00004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nugter, M. A., Engelsbel, F., Bahler, M., Keet, R., & van Veldhuizen, R. (2016). Outcomes of FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) Implementation: A prospective real life study. Community Mental Health Journal, 52(8), 898–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9831-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S., Byford, S., & Raftery, J. (1999). Types of economic evaluation. British Medical Journal, 318(7194), 1349. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7194.1349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer, U., Wille, N., Badia, X., Bonsel, G., Burström, K., Cavrini, G., & Greiner, W. (2010). Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: Results from a multinational study. Quality of Life Research, 19(6), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9649-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer, U., Herdman, M., Devine, J., Otto, C., Bullinger, M., Rose, M., & Klasen, F. (2014). The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: Development, current application, and future advances. Quality of Life Research, 23(3), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0428-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolk, E. A., Busschbach, J. J. V., & Vogels, T. (2000). Performance of the EuroQol in children with imperforate anus. Quality of Life Research, 9(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008923029886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tompke, B. K., & Ferro, M. A. M. (2019). Invariance and informant discrepancies of the KIDSCREEN-27 in children with mental disorder. Applied Research Quality Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09801-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Busschbach, J. J., Hout, B. V., Hastrup, L. H., Aagaard, J., Mavranezouli, I., Mayo-Wilson, E., & Reviewers, D. (2013). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901309010202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Steensel, F. J. A., Dirksen, C. D., & Bögels, S. M. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy versus treatment as usual for anxiety disorders in children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Veldhuizen, R., Bähler, M., Polhuis, D., & van Os, J. (2008). Handboek FACT (pp. 29–48). Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, D. C., Joore, M. A., Nieman, F. H., Severens, J. L., Wouters, E. F., & Hendriks, J. J. (2009). Using EQ-5D in children with asthma, rheumatic disorders, diabetes, and speech/language and/or hearing disorders. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 25(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462309990171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Sponsoring: No sponsoring.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author’s responsibilities were as follows: Material preparation (JH, AN), Data collection (JH, AN), Analysis (JH, AN, FE). The first draft of the manuscript was written by JH and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes W. F. Hogewind.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hogewind, J.W.F., Nugter, M.A. & Engelsbel, F. Pilot Study of the Cost-Effectiveness of Youth F-ACT in the Netherlands. Community Ment Health J 57, 701–710 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-021-00791-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-021-00791-z

Keywords

Navigation