Measuring Recurring Stigma in the Lives of Individuals with Mental Illness
- 856 Downloads
We present an exploratory factor analysis of the 8-item Daily Indignities of Mental Illness (DIMI) scale, created to measure the detection and perceptions of recurring stigma among individuals with recent psychiatric hospitalizations. Structured in-person interviews were conducted with individuals with recent psychiatric hospitalizations in metropolitan New York. The 8-item DIMI scale’s internal consistency for the sample (n = 65), measured by Cronbach’s alpha, was 0.869. Statistically significantly higher DIMI scale scores were observed among individuals with more than 2 psychotic episodes and those reporting seeing relatives less often after hospitalization. The DIMI scale possesses good internal consistency for research contextualizing perceptions around the occurrence or recurrence of mental illness-related stigma among individuals with recent psychiatric hospitalizations.
KeywordsStigma Micro-aggression Mental illness Self esteem Exploratory factor analysis
We wish to thank the study participants and their mental healthcare providers for their commitment to this study. We also wish to thank the field and study staff for their hard work and dedication to the research being undertaken in this study.
The data collection and research carried out for this manuscript was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH74996) and by funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health and Society Scholars Program at Columbia University.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict to report.
- Bandalos, D. L., Boehm-Kaufman, M. R., Bandalos, D. L., & Boehm-Kaufman, M. R. (2008). Four common misconceptions in exploratory factor analysis. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. pp. 61–87.Google Scholar
- Carliner, H., Collins, P. Y., Cabassa, L. J., McNallen, A., Joestl, S. S., & Lewis-Fernández, R. (2014). Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among racial and ethnic minorities with schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorders: A critical literature review. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(2), 233–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doty, M. M., & Fund, C. (2003). Hispanic patients’ double burden: Lack of health insurance and limited English. New York: Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
- Manderscheid, R., Delvecchio, P., Marshall, C., Palpant, R., Bigham, J., Bornemann, T. … Lubar, D. (2010). Attitudes toward mental illness: 35 states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 59(20), 619–625.Google Scholar
- Parks, J., Svendsen, D., Singer, P., Foti, M. E., & Mauer, B. (2006). Morbidity and mortality in people with serious mental illness. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Medical Directors Council.Google Scholar
- Perlick, D. A., Rosenheck, R. A., Clarkin, J. F., Sirey, J. A., Salahi, J., Struening, E. L., & Link, B. G. (2001). Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptation of persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder. Psychiatric Services, 52(12), 1627–1632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sirey, J. A., Bruce, M. L., Alexopoulos, G. S., Perlick, D. A., Friedman, S. J., & Meyers, B. S. (2001). Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence. Psychiatric Services, 52(12), 1615–1620.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solorzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 79(4), 60–73.Google Scholar
- Thornicroft, G., Leff, J., Warner, R., Sartorius, N., & Schulze, H. (2009). Shunned: Discrimination against people with mental illness. Journal of Occupational Psychology, Employment and Disability, 11, 56–58.Google Scholar