Abstract
The Evaluation of Therapeutic Community Treatments and Outcomes (VOECT) study was conducted in 131 Italian Therapeutic Communities (TCs) in 2008/2009. All of the patients entering residential treatment for drug or alcohol dependence were invited to participate. Data regarding patient socio-demographic characteristics, drug and alcohol consumption, health and psychopathological status, prior treatments and outcomes, and their motivation score were collected upon enrolment onto the study. The aim of this work was to identify the factors associated with allocation to short- versus long-term programmes in drug or alcohol dependent patients entering TCs in Italy. Of the 2470 patients included in the analysis, 30.8% were allocated to short-term treatment and 69.2% to long-term treatment. Several factors were significantly associated with the allocation to short- and long-term treatments: unstable living conditions; entering the TC when not detoxified; a high Symptom Checklist-90 somatization score; prior cessation episodes; previous in-patient detoxification treatments; psychosocial treatments; entering the TC by oneself; and a low motivation score.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adinoff, B. H., Scannell, S., Carter, L. A., & Dohoney, K. (1999). Inpatient treatment. In P. J. Ott, R. E. Tarter & R. T. Ammerman (Eds.), Sourcebook on substance abuse: Etiology, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 373–388). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Condelli, W. S., & Hubbard, R. L. (1994). Relationship between time spent in treatment and client outcomes from therapeutic communities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11(1), 25–33.
De Leon, G. (1989). Psychopathology and substance abuse: what is being learned from research in therapeutic communities. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 21(2), 177–188.
De Leon, G. (1995). Therapeutic communities for addictions: a theoretical framework. International Journal of the Addictions, 30(12), 1603–1645.
De Leon, G. (1997). Community as method: Therapeutic Communities for special populations and special settings. Westport: Praeger.
De Leon, G. (1999). Therapeutic communities. In P. J. Ott, R. E. Tarter & R. T. Ammerman (Eds.), Sourcebook on substance abuse: Etiology, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
De Leon, G., Melnick, G., & Cleland, C. M. (2010). Matching to sufficient treatment: some characteristics of undertreated (mismatched) clients. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 29(1), 59–67.
De Leon, G., Melnick, G., & Cleland, C.M. (2008). Client matching: a severity-treatment intensity paradigm. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 27(3). 99–113.
De Leon, G., Melnick, G., Kressel, D., & Jainchill, N. (1994). Circumstances, motivation, readiness, and suitability (The CMRS Scales): predicting retention in therapeutic community treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 20, 495–515.
Derogatis, L., Lipman, R., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale – preliminary report. Psychoparmacology Bulletin, 9, 13–28.
Dye, M. H., Ducharme, L. J., Johnson, J. A., Knudsen, H. K., & Roman, P. M. (2009). Modified therapeutic communities and adherence to traditional elements. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 41(3), 275–283.
Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Secades, R., Fernández, J. J., & Marina, P. A. (2002). Effectiveness of a Therapeutic community treatment in Spain: A long-term follow-up study. European Addiction Research, 8, 22–29.
Fernández-Montalvo, J., López-Goñi, J. J., Illescas, C., Landa, N., & Lorea, I. (2008). Evaluation of a therapeutic community treatment program: a long-term follow-up study in Spain. Substance Use and Misuse, 43(10), 1362–1377.
French, M. T., Zarkin, G. A., Hubbard, R. L., & Rachal, J. V. (1993). The effects of time in drug abuse treatment and employment on posttreatment drug use and criminal activity. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19(1), 19–33.
Galanter, M., & Kleber, H. D. (Eds.). (1994). Textbook of substance abuse treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Stewart, D., & Rolfe, A. (1999). Treatment retention and 1 year outcomes for residential programmes in England. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57, 89–98.
Gossop, M., Stewart, D., Browne, N., & Marsden, J. (2002). Factors associated with abstinence, lapse or relapse to heroin use after residential treatment: protective effect of coping responses. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 97, 1259–1267.
Greenfield, L., Burgdorf, K., Chen, X., Porowski, A., Roberts, T., & Herrell, J. (2004). Effectiveness of long-term residential substance abuse treatment for women: findings from three national studies. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30, 537–550.
Harris, A.H.S., Kivlahan, D., Barnett, P. G., & Finney, L. W. (2012). Longer length of stay is not associated with better outcomes in VHA’s substance abuse residential rehabilitation treatment programs. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 39(1), 68–79.
Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Harwood, H. J., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Ginzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: a national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: The Universiy of North Carolina Press.
Hubbard, R. L., Craddock, S. G., & Anderson, J. (2003). Overview of 5-year follow up outcomes in the drug abuse treatment outcome studies (DATOS). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25(3), 125–134.
Joe, G. W., Simpson, D. D., & Broome, K. M. (1998). Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 93(8), 1177–1190.
Laffaye, C., McKellar, J. D., Ilgen, M. A., & Moos, R. H. (2008). Predictors of 4-year outcome of community residential treatment for patients with substance use disorders. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 103(4), 671–680.
Leshner, A. I. (1997). Drug abuse and addiction treatment research: the next generation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(8), 691–694.
Malivert, M., Fatséas, M., Denis, C., Langlois, E., & Auriacombe, M. (2012). Effectiveness of therapeutic communities: a systematic review. European Addiction Research, 18(1), 1–11.
Mathis, F., Vigna-Taglianti, F., Diecidue, R., Kirchmayer, U., Piras, G., Amato, L., et al. (2013). Studio VOECT- Valutazione dell’Offerta e dell’Esito dei trattamenti in Comunità Terapeutiche. Monografia numero 1. Analisi descrittiva della coorte arruolata. Retrieved from http://www.oed.piemonte.it/pubblic/3_VOECT/monografiaVOECT.pdf.
Mattick, R. P., & Jarvis, T. (1994). In-patient setting and long duration for the treatment of alcohol dependence? Out-patient care is as good. Drug Alcohol Rev., 13, 127–135.
Mattson, M. E., Allen, J. P., Longabaugh, R., Nickless, C. J., Connors, G. J., & Kadden, R. M. (1994). A chronological review of empirical studies matching alcoholic clients to treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol Supplement, 12, 16–29.
McCusker, J., Vickers-Lahti, M., Stoddard, A. M., Hindin, R., Bigelow, C., Garfield, F., et al. (1995). The effectiveness of alternative planned durations of residential drug abuse treatment. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 1426–1429.
McCusker, J., Stoddard, A., Frost, R., & Zorn, M. (1996). Planned versus actual duration of drug abuse treatment. Reconciling observational and experimental evidence. Journal of Nervous Mental Disease, 184, 482–489.
McCusker, J., Bigelow, C., Frost, R., Garfield, F., Hindin, R., Vickers-Lahti, M., et al (1997). The effects of planned duration of residential drug abuse treatment on recovery and HIV risk behavior. American Journal of Public Health, 87(10), 1637–1644.
McKellar, J. D., Harris, A. H., & Moos, R. H. (2006). Predictors of outcome for patients with substance-use disorders five years after treatment drop-out. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(5), 685–693.
McLellan, A. T., Alterman, A. I., Metzger, D. S., Grissom, G. R., Woody, G. E., Luborsky, L., et al. (1994). Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: Role of treatment services. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 1141–1158.
Melnick, G., De Leon, G., Hiller, M. L., & Knight, K. (2000). Therapeutic communities: Diversity in treatment elements. Substance Use and Misuse, 35(12–14), 1819–1847.
Melnick, G., De Leon, G., Thomas, G., & Kressel, D. (2001). A client-treatment matching protocol for therapeutic communities: First report. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 21(3), 119–128.
Messina, N., Wish, E., & Nemes, S. (2000). Predictors of treatment outcomes in men and women admitted to a therapeutic community. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 207–227.
Miller, W. R., & Cooney, N. L. (1994). Designing studies to investigate client-treatment matching. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. Supplement, 12, 38–45.
Moos, R. H., & King, M. J. (1997). Participation in community residential treatment and substance abuse patients’ outcomes at discharge. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14(1), 71–80.
Moos, R. H., Moos, B. S., & Andrassy, J. M. (1999). Outcomes of four treatment approaches in community residential programs for patients with substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 50(12), 1577–1583.
Moos, R. H., Pettit, B., & Gruber, V. (1995). Longer episodes of community residential care reduce substance abuse patients’ readmission rates. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56(4), 433–443.
Mulder, R. T., Frampton, C.M.A., Peka, H., Hampton, G., & Marsters, T. (2009). Predictors of 3-month retention in a drug treatment therapeutic community. Drug Alcohol Review, 28, 366–371.
Nemes, S., Wish, E. D., & Messina, N. (1999). Comparing the impact of standard and abbreviated treatment in a therapeutic community. Findings from the district of Columbia treatment initiative experiment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17(4), 339–347.
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. (1999). Accordo Stato-Regioni per la “Riorganizzazione del sistema di assistenza ai tossicodipendenti”. Provvedimento 21 gennaio 1999. Retrieved from http://www.politicheantidroga.it/droghe/normativa/nazionale/accordi-stato-regioni.aspx.
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. (2008). Relazione annuale al Parlamento sullo stato delle tossicodipendenze in Italia, Anno 2007. Retrieved from http://www.politicheantidroga.it/progetti-e-ricerca/relazioni-al-parlamento.aspx.
Simpson, D. D. (1979). The relation of time spent in drug abuse treatment to posttreatment outcome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 1449–1453.
Simpson, D. D. (1981). Treatment for drug abuse. Follow-up outcomes and length of time spent. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38(8), 875–880.
Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., Broome, K., Hiller, M., Knight, K., & Rowan-Szal, G. (1997). Program diversity and treatment retention rates in the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). Psychol. Addict. Behav., 11(4), 279–293.
Smith, L. A., Gates, S., & Foxcroft, D. (2006). Therapeutic communities for substance related disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD005338.
Soyez, V., DE Leon, G., Broekaert, E., & Rosseel, Y. (2006). The impact of a social network intervention on retention in Belgian therapeutic communities: a quasi-experimental study. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 101, 1027–1034.
Toumbourou, J. W., Hamilton, M., & Fallon, B. (1998). Treatment level progress and time spent in treatment in the prediction of outcomes following drug-free therapeutic community treatment. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 93(7), 1051–1064.
Van de Velde, J. C., Schaap, G. E., & Land, H. (1998). Follow-up at a Dutch addiction hospital and effectiveness of therapeutic community treatment. Substance Use Misuse, 33(8), 1611–1627.
Wellisch, J., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1995). Toward a drug abuse treatment system. Journal of Drug Issues, 25, 759–782.
Westenberg, M. R. M., Koele, P., & Kools, E. (1998). The treatment of substance addicts: a judgment analysis of therapists’ matching strategies. Clinical Psychology Psychotherapy, 5, 39–46.
Wild, C. (1996) Treatment Entry Questionnaire. Unpublished Instrument available from Dr. Cam Wild, Addiction Research Foundation, U.W.O. Research Park, 100 Collip Circle, London, Ontario, N6C 4X8,.
Acknowledgements
The study would have not been possible without the collaboration of the patients and of the staff at the Therapeutic Communities.
Author Contributions
PPP, ET, FV-T, UK, RD, AS, LA, JG, MD and FF designed the study. PPP, FM, FV-T, RD, ET, UK, GP, AC and JG created the study instruments. AC, JG, GP, ET and FM coordinated the data collection. FV-T, FM, PPP and RD designed the strategy of analysis for this paper. FM analysed the data. FV-T and PPP drafted the paper. All of the authors contributed to the revision of the paper and approved the final version.
Funding
VOECT is a project funded by the National Ministry of Health (Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata 2006 Grant No. RF-SAR-2006-341958). Additional funding was provided by Regione Piemonte (201-30/11/2007).
The VOECT Study Group
Pier Paolo Pani, Emanuela Trogu, Rosangela Vacca (ASL Cagliari, Italy), Ilario Carta (General Directorate of Health and Welfare, Sardinia Region, Italy), Federica Vigna-Taglianti, Federica Mathis, Roberto Diecidue, Barbara Zunino, Fabrizio Faggiano (Piedmont Centre for Drug Addiction Epidemiology, ASLTO3, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy); Ursula Kirchmayer, Marina Davoli M, Giovanna Piras, Laura Amato (Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy), Joli Ghibaudi, Teresa Marzocchi, Antonella Camposeragna, (Coordinating Centre of Italian Residential Communities–CNCA, Rome, Italy); Alessio Saponaro, Mila Ferri (General Directorate of Health and Social Policies, Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare to have no conflict of interest. All authors certify their responsibility for the present manuscript.
Ethical Approval
In accordance with the Ethical Principle of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, full confidentiality was obtained and anonymity was assured by assigning each patient an anonymous code. Information on the study and the contents of the forms to be completed were reviewed with the participants before the interviews.
Informed Consent
All participants signed a written, informed consent form and were informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time without any ensuing consequences.
IRB Statement
The study was not reported to an Ethical Committee as it is not required in Italy for observational studies.
Additional information
Collaborators of the VOECT Study Group are listed in “Acknowledgment”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vigna-Taglianti, F., Mathis, F., Diecidue, R. et al. Factors Predicting Patient’s Allocation to Short- and Long-Term Therapeutic Community Treatments in the Italian VOECT Cohort Study. Community Ment Health J 53, 972–983 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0105-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0105-z