Skip to main content

Reliability and Validity of a Newly Developed Measure of Citizenship Among Persons with Mental Illnesses

Abstract

Following development of a 46-item of measure citizenship, a framework for supporting the full membership in society of persons with mental illness, this study tested the measure’s reliability and validity. 110 persons from a mental health center completed a questionnaire packet containing the citizenship measure and other measures to assess internal consistency and validity of the citizenship instrument. Correlation matrices were examined for associations between the citizenship instrument and other measures. Stepwise regression examines demographic factors, sense of community, and social capital as predictors of citizenship, recovery, and well-being. Analyses revealed that the measure is psychometrically sound. The measure captures subjective information about the degree to which individuals experience rights, sense of belonging, and other factors associated with community membership that have been previously difficult to assess. The measure establishes a platform for interventions to support the full participation in society of persons with mental illnesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Chipuer, H. M., & Pretty, G. H. (1999). A review of the sense of community index: Current uses, factor structure, reliability, and future development. Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 643–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, A., O'Connell, M.J., Bellamy, C., Benedict, P., & Rowe, M. (2013). The citizenship project part II: Impact of a citizenship intervention on clinical and community outcomes for persons with mental illness and criminal justice involvement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1–2), 114–122.

  • Davidson, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional scaling. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. (1980). Cluster analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. & Owen, D. (2000). Social capital, active citizenship and political equality in Australia. In I. Winter (Ed.), Social capital and public policy in Australia (74–103). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., et al. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, A. F., Postrado, L. T., & Rachuba, L. T. (1993). Convergent validation of quality of life assessments for persons with severe mental illnesses. Quality of Life Research, 2, 327–333.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, D., & Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2003). Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. A., Cook, J. A., & Cohler, B. J. (1994). Caregiving burden experienced by parents of offspring with severe mental illness: Impact of off-timedness. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 18, 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. (1999). Crossing the border: Encounters between homeless people and outreach workers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., et al. (2001). Homelessness, mental illness and citizenship. Social Policy and Administration, 35, 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., et al. (2007). A peer-support, group intervention to reduce substance use and criminality among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58, 955–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., et al. (2012). Going to the source: Citizenship outcome measure development. Psychiatric Services, 63(1–6), 445–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • President’ s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America: Executive summary (DHHS publication no. SMA 03-3831). Rockville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, IBM. (2010). SPSS statistics version 19.0.0.1.

  • Stanton, A., & Revenson, T. (2006). Adjustment to chronic disease: Progress and promise in research. In H. S. Friedman & R. C. Silver (Eds.), Foundations of Health Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N. B., & Duran, B. (2006). Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion Practice, 7, 312–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The funding was provided by State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley Clayton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No disclosures for any author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Connell, M.J., Clayton, A. & Rowe, M. Reliability and Validity of a Newly Developed Measure of Citizenship Among Persons with Mental Illnesses. Community Ment Health J 53, 367–374 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-0054-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-0054-y

Keywords

  • Citizenship
  • Social inclusion
  • Mental illness
  • Measure development
  • Measure validation