Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Justice at Work and Psychiatric Morbidity Among the Personnel of an Italian Hospital

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the association between justice in the workplace (and other psychosocial factors) and mental health among healthcare professionals. It was conducted in a sample of hospital employees in Italy. The prevalence of mental disorders was assessed and the relationships between having a disorder and the level of perceived justice, job control and effort-reward imbalance were investigated. Psychiatric morbidity among professionals with higher perceived justice were 0.3–0.9 times lower than those among those with lower perceived justice. This finding suggests that improving fairness at work does matter for disease prevention and mental health promotion policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M. C., Bernert, S., et al. (2004). ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 investigators, European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project: Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: Results from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum, 420, 21–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arber, S. (2001). Designing samples. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. P., Perry, G. S., & Strine, T. W. (2005). The vital link between chronic disease and depressive disorders. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2, A14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., Kawachi, I., Coakley, E. H., Schwartz, J., & Colditz, G. (2000). Association between psychosocial work characteristics and health functioning in American women: Prospective study. BMJ, 320, 1432–1436.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cinamon Rich, R. G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work-family conflict. Sex roles: A Journal of Research, 47, 531–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Girolamo, G., Polidori, G., Morosini, P., et al. (2006). Prevalence of common mental disorders in Italy: Results from the European study of the epidemiology of mental disorders (ESEMeD). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 853–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., & Vahtera, J. (2002). Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 105–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Escribà-Agüir, V., & Tenías-Burillo, J. M. (2004). Psychological well-being among hospital personnel: The role of family demands and psychosocial work environment. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 77, 401–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eskelinen, L., Toikkanen, J., Tuomi, K., Mauno, I., Nygård, C. H., & Ilmarinen, J. (1991). Symptoms of mental and physical stress in different categories of municipal work. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 17(Suppl 1), 82–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faravelli, C., Abrardi, L., Bartolozzi, D., et al. (2004). the sesto fiorentino study: Point and one-year prevalences of psychiatric disorders in an Italian community sample using clinical interviewers. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 73, 226–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigantesco, A., & Morosini, P. (2008). Development, reliability and factor analysis of a self-administered questionnaire which originates from the World Health Organization’s Composite International Diagnostic Interview—Short Form (CIDI-SF) for assessing mental disorders. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 4, 8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gigantesco, A., Mirabella, F., Bonaviri, G., & Morosini, P. (2004). Assessment of working conditions in health care. [in Italian]. Medicina del Lavoro 95, 431–440.

  • Gigantesco, A., Palumbo, G., Mirabella, F., Pettinelli, M., & Morosini, P. (2006). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in an Italian town: Low prevalence confirmed with two different interviews. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 75, 170–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A users guide to the general health questionnaire. Berkshire, UK: NFER-Nelson Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., McMichael, A. J., Wells, J. A., Kaplan, B. H., & Landerman, L. R. (1979). Occupational stress and health among factory workers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 139–160.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordanova, V., Wickramesinghe, C., Gerada, C., & Prince, M. (2004). Validation of two survey diagnostic interviews among primary care attendees: A comparison of CIS-R and CIDI with SCAN ICD-10 diagnostic categories. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1013–1024.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A. (1985). Job content questionnaire and User’s Guide, Revision 1.1. Los Angeles, University of Southern California.

  • Karasek, R. E., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Mroczek, D., Ustun, B., & Wittchen, H. U. (1998). The world health organization composite international diagnostic interview short form (CIDI-SF). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 7, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, M., Elovainio, M., Vahtera, J., Virtanen, M., & Stansfeld, S. A. (2003). Association between organizational inequity and incidence of psychiatric disorders in female employees. Psychological Medicine, 33, 319–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, M., Ferrie, J. E., Head, J., Shipley, M. J., Vahtera, J., & Marmot, M. G. (2004). Organisational justice and change in justice as predictors of employee health: The Whitehall II study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 931–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, M., Ferrie, J. E., Brunner, E., Head, J., Shipley, M. J., Vahtera, J., et al. (2005). Justice at work and reduced risk of coronary heart disease among employees: The Whitehall II study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 2245–2251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, M., Vahtera, J., Elovainio, M., Virtanen, M., & Siegrist, J. (2007). Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: Complementary or redundant models? Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, 659–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2004). Status syndrome: How your social standing directly affects your health and life expectancy. London, England: Bloombury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. A., & Gump, B. B. (2002). Chronic work stress and marital dissolution increase risk of posttrial mortality in men from the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 309–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, T. J., Raju, N. S., & Collins, W. C. (1998). Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. B., Kessler, R. C., & Mroczek, D. (1999). CIDI-SF 12 months DSM-IV version–v1.1. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peen, J., Dekker, J., Schoevers, R. A., Have, M. T., de Graaf, R., & Beekman, A. T. (2007). Is the prevalence of psychiatric disorders associated with urbanization? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42, 984–989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pikhart, H., Bobak, M., Siegrist, J., et al. (2001). Psychosocial work characteristics and self rated health in four post-communist countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 624–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C., Hof, A., & Alvarenga, M. (2000). Serum lipids and their relationships with hostility and angry affect and behaviors in men. Health Psychology, 19, 393–398.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 27–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, J. (2008). The model of effort-reward imbalance. Available at: http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/MedicalSociology/eri/eri-save/statistical_information.htm. Accessed 11 March 2008.

  • Siegrist, J., Starke, D., Chandola, T., et al. (2004). The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1483–1499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzia, J., & Wood, N. (1998). Response rate in patient satisfaction research: An analysis of 210 published studies. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 10, 311–317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfeld, S. A., Fuhrer, R., Shipley, M. J., & Marmot, M. G. (1999). Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: Prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56, 302–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium. (2004). Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the world health organization world mental health surveys. JAMA, 291, 2581–2590.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress, 13, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, E. E., Kessler, R. C., Nelson, C. B., & Mroczek, D. (2002). CIDI-SF 12 months DSM-IV version–v1.1. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is dedicated to Pierluigi Morosini, who passed away in September 2008, a leader in Psychiatric Epidemiology and in the improvement of the quality of healthcare. The authors wish to thank all of the health professionals who participated in this research. We are also grateful to the hospital’s Medical Director for coordinating the local data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonella Gigantesco.

Appendix Questionnaire “Working Conditions in Healthcare Providers”

Appendix Questionnaire “Working Conditions in Healthcare Providers”

Item

(scale: “very poor”, “poor”, “acceptable”, “good”, “excellent”)

As far as your work is concerned, how do you rate the following?

  1. (1)

    Wages

  2. (2)

    Advancement opportunities

  3. (3)

    Opportunity to learn new things and skills

  4. (4)

    Availability of training courses

  5. (5)

    Availability of learning material (e.g., books, journals, audiovisual materials)

  6. (6)

    Encouragement by managers to acquire and implement new skills

  7. (7)

    Encouragement by managers to make suggestions for improvement

  8. (8)

    Involvement in decision-making that is relevant to one’s job

  9. (9)

    Superiors’ willingness to listen to employees’ problems and provide help

  10. (10)

    Fairness in work quality recognition and promotions

  11. (11)

    Superiors’ consistency in making requests

  12. (12)

    Opportunity to work on a variety of tasks or projects

  13. (13)

    Availability of information (e.g., about meetings, courses, organizational changes)

  14. (14)

    Professional relationships with colleagues

  15. (15)

    Clarity of job responsibilities

  16. (16)

    Feeling of usefulness

  17. (17)

    Personal relationships with colleagues

  18. (18)

    Relationships with administrative staff

  19. (19)

    Physical space and furnishings

  20. (20)

    Available equipment

(scale: “very much”, “much”, “moderately”, “little”, “not at all”)

To what extent are the following features present in your job?

  1. (21)

    Job-related risk of injury or illness

  2. (22)

    Too much or too heavy or too fast work

  3. (23)

    Physical effort

  4. (24)

    Psychological distress

  5. (25)

    Uncomfortable physical position

  6. (26)

    Inconvenient shifts

  7. (27)

    Inconvenient working hours

  8. (28)

    Work at night or during holidays

  9. (29)

    How much more autonomy would you like to have in your work?

(scale: “no, qualifications much too low”, “no, qualifications low”, “yes”, “no, qualifications high”, “no, qualifications much too high”)

  1. (30)

    Does your job correspond to your professional qualifications?

(scale: “never, or at most one day”, “5–2 days”, “10–6 days”, “most days”, “always”)

  1. (31)

    In the last 30 working days, how often were you pleased to go to work?

  2. (32)

    How often, at the end of the workday, did you feel mentally exhausted?

  3. (33)

    How often has your work made you anxious or tense?

(scale: “not at all”, “little” “somewhat” “much”, “very much”)

  1. (34)

    How much do you wish to change your place of work?

  2. (35)

    How much do you wish to change your kind of job?

  3. (36)

    How much have you been a victim of mobbing?

(quantitative scale: number of days or hours)

  1. (37)

    In the past 12 months, how many days have you been absent for illness?

  2. (38)

    In the past 12 months, how many days have you been absent for other reasons (e.g., family reasons)?

  3. (39)

    On average, for how many hours of the day do you feel that you are not doing anything useful?

(Analogical scale from 1 to 10 with three anchor points corresponding to 1 “my workplace condition is the worst possible”, 6 “I have a barely acceptable condition of work”, and 10 “my workplace condition is the best possible”)

  1. (40)

    Please place an “x” on the number that best corresponds to your opinion about your work condition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gigantesco, A. Justice at Work and Psychiatric Morbidity Among the Personnel of an Italian Hospital. Community Ment Health J 47, 341–350 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9318-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9318-0

Keywords

Navigation