Abstract
Social supports for youth and families receiving mental health services are important for family success and sustainability of systems of care. The goal of our study was to determine what help and support families and youth receive and from whom they receive it. We surveyed youth and families enrolled in community wraparound care coordination to determine the support they receive. The social supports questionnaire measures include: the kinds of help and support that the parent/caregiver and youth received from people in the past 6 months, and the kinds of people who helped the parent/caregiver and youth in the past 6 months. Results show that social support networks are weak for both family and youth. Variations in scores suggest that wraparound family teams should focus on strategies that enhance the development of social supports. Data collected at 6-month followup were analyzed to determine if families and youth have increased their social support networks and expanded the kinds of people that provide support to them. Our research question is “What kinds of help and social support do youth and families receive and from whom do they receive it?”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, D. B., Jr., Nelson, L., Hebbeler, K., & Spiker, D. (2007). Modeling the impact of formal and informal supports for young children with disabilities and their families. Pediatrics, 120, 992–1001.
Bertera, E. (2007). The role of positive and negative social exchanges between adolescents, their peers and family as predictors of suicide ideation. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24, 523–538.
Bruns, E. J., Walker, J. S., Adams, J., Miles, P., Osher, T. W., Rast, J., et al. (2004). Ten principles of the wraparound process. Portland: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University.
Cutrona, C. E., & Cole, V. (2000). Optimizing support in the natural network. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 278–308). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dalder, G. (2006). Common practice challenges and promising coaching solutions. Focal Point Winter, 2006(20), 26–28.
Jivanjee, P., Kruzich, J., & Gordon, L. (2008). Community integration of transition-age individuals: Views of young with mental health disorders. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 35(4), 402–417.
Jorm, A. F., Morgan, A. J., & Wright, A. (2008). Interventions that are helpful for depression and anxiety in young people: A comparison of clinicians’ beliefs with those of youth and their parents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 111, 227–234.
Kessler, R. C., Nelson, C. B., McGonagle, K. A., Liu, J., Swartz, M., & Blazer, D. G. (1996). Comorbidity of DSM-III-R major depressive disorder in the general population: Results from the US national comorbidity survey. British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement, 168(30), 17–30.
Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 127–139.
Sheffield, J. K., Fiorenza, E., & Sofronoff, K. (2004). Adolescents’ willingness to seek psychological help: Promoting and preventing factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 495–507.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Children’s Mental Health Services, National Evaluation, Data Profile Report (2008). Family Voices Network, Erie County, NY. Prepared by the National Evaluation Team at Macro International Inc., December 2008.
Sweet, J. A., Bumpass, L. L., Call, V. R. A. (1988). The design and content of the national survey of families and households. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin.
Walker, J., & Aue, N. (2006). Focal Point, Winter 2006. Strengthening social support. Portland: Research and Training Center, Portland State University.
Walsh, F. (2002). A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications. Family Relations, 51(2), 130–137.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the youth, parents, caregivers and Erie County for their input and participation without whom this project would not have been possible. This research was funded by The Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, Children’s Mental Health Services Grant SM-03-009 and Erie County, NY Departments of Mental Health and Social Services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kernan, J.B., Morilus-Black, M. Social Supports for Youth and Families. Community Ment Health J 46, 258–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9266-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9266-8