Monitoring the Dissemination of Peer Support in the VA Healthcare System

Abstract

This study illustrates a monitoring system for peer support programs, focusing on Vet-to-Vet, a program for veterans with chronic psychiatric disorders. The sample consisted of 1,847 anonymous surveys from 38 veteran peer support programs. Program satisfaction and recovery orientation were positively associated with duration and frequency of participation in peer support. Program satisfaction was also associated with the Vet-to-Vet model and location at a VA medical center (vs. other model & location types). Payment for peer facilitators was positively associated with recovery orientation, spirituality, and engagement in meaningful activity. Additional research using experimental design methods is needed to determine the impact of peer support on mental health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Burti, L., Amaddeo, F., Ambrosi, M., Bonetto, C., Christofalo, D., Ruggeri M., et al. (2005). Does additional care provided by a consumer self-help group improve psychiatric outcome? A study in an Italian community-based psychiatric service. Community Mental Health Journal, 41(6), 705–718.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, S. M., Roland, M. O., & Buetow, S. A. (2000). Defining quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1611–1625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chinman, M. (2002). Service providers’ views of psychiatric mutual support groups. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corrigan, P. W., Calabrese, J. D., Diwan, S. E., Keogh, C. B., Keck, L., & Mussey, C. (2002). Some recovery processes in mutual-help groups for persons with mental illness; I: Qualitative analysis of program materials and testimonies. Community Mental Health Journal, 38(4), 287.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corrigan, P. W., Slopen, N., Gracia, G., Phelan, S., Keogh, C. B., & Keck, L. (2005). Some recovery processes in mutual-help groups for persons with mental illness; II: Qualitative analysis of participant interviews. Community Mental Health Journal, 41(6), 721–735.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurtz, L. F. (1997). Self-help and support groups: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mead, S., Hilton, D., & Curtis, L. (2001). Peer support: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(2), 134–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Min, S. Y., Whitecraft, J., Rothbard, A. B., & Salzer, M. S. (2007). Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: A survival analysis. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 30(3), 207–213.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Proceeds of the Mutual Learning: A VA Peer Support & Education Conference. (2005). Available online: http://www.veteranrecovery.org/announce/Suggested_Practices_from_Conference.htm.

  10. Resnick, S. G., Armstrong, M., Sperrazza, M., Harkness, L., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2004a). A model of consumer–provider partnership: Vet-to-Vet. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 28(2), 185–187.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Resnick, S. G., Fontana, A., Lehman, A. F., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2005). An empirical conceptualization of the recovery orientation. Schizophrenia Research, 75, 119–128.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Resnick, S. G., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2006). Recovery and positive psychology: Parallel themes and potential synergies. Psychiatric Services, 57(1), 120–122.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Resnick, S. G., Rosenheck, R. A., & Lehman, A. F. (2004b). An exploratory analysis of correlates of recovery. Psychiatric Services, 55(5), 540–547.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenheck, R. A., Wilson, N., & Meterko, M. (1997). Consumer satisfaction with inpatient mental health treatment: Influence of patient and hospital factors. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scheid, T., & Greenley, J. R. (1997). Evaluations of organizational effectiveness in mental health programs. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 403–426.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56(3), 216–217.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shepherd, M. D., Schoenberg, M., Slavich, S., Wituk, S., Warren, M., & Meissen, G. (1999). Continuum of professional involvement in self-help groups. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart, M. J. (1990). Professional interface with mutual-aid self-help groups: A review. Social Science & Medicine, 31(10), 1143–1158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra G. Resnick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barber, J.A., Rosenheck, R.A., Armstrong, M. et al. Monitoring the Dissemination of Peer Support in the VA Healthcare System. Community Ment Health J 44, 433–441 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-008-9146-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Peer support
  • Recovery
  • Vet-to-Vet
  • Program evaluation