Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 243–257 | Cite as

Consumer and Family Views on Evidence-Based Practices and Adult Mental Health Services

  • Anna Scheyett
  • Erin McCarthy
  • Christina Rausch


Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an important construct in mental health services. Though much has been written about them, there is little in the literature that fully explores consumers’ and family members’ views regarding EBPs. Using a focus group methodology, this study asked the question “What are consumers’ and family member’s views of EBPs within the larger context of their mental health service needs and their experiences with the mental health service system?” Results indicate that consumers and families have limited knowledge of EBPs, are generally supportive of EBPs, but have questions and concerns that are grounded in systemic and contextual considerations.


evidence-based practice community mental health services consumers families of persons with mental illnesses mental health systems. 


  1. Anthony W. (2003a). Research on evidence-based practices: Future directions in an era of recovery. Community Mental Health Journal 39(2):101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony W. (2003b). Studying evidence-based processes, not practices. Psychiatric Services 54(1):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond G., Becker D., Drake R., Rapp C.A., Meisler N., Lehman A., Bell M.D., Blyler C.R. (2001). Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services 52(3):313–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridging science and services: Evidence-based practices in adult mental health services in North Carolina. (2004). Retrieved July 20, 2004, from
  5. Calhoun, M. (2002, April 2003). Grant results report: Evidence-based care for persons with serious mental illness. Retrieved June 24, 2003, from
  6. Dixon L., McFarlane W., Lefley H., Lucksted A., Cohen M., Falloon I., Mueser K., Miklowitz D., Solomon P., Sondheimer D. (2001). Evidence-based practicess for services to families of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Services 52(7):903–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drake R., Essock S., Shaner A., Carey K., Minkoff K., Kola L., Lynde D., Osher F.C., Clark R.E., Rickards L. (2001a). Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services 52(4):469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drake R., Goldman H., Leff S., Lehman A., Dixon L., Mueser K., Torrey W.C. (2001b). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services 52(1):179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Essock S., Goldman H., VanTosh L., Anthony W.A., Appell C.R., Bond G.R., Dixon L.B., Dunakin L.K., Ganju V., Gorman P.G., Ralph R.O., Rapp C.A., Teague G.B., Drake R.E. (2003). Evidence-based practices: Setting the context and responding to concerns. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 26:919–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evidence-based care for persons with serious mental illness. (2004). Retrieved July 18, 2004, from
  11. Frese F., Stanley J., Kress K., Vogel-Scibilia S. (2001). Integrating evidence-based practices and the recovery model. Psychiatric Services 52(11):1462–1468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ganju V. (2001). Bridging the gap between research and service with evidence-based practices. National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser B., Strauss A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, AldineGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammaker R. (1996). A multi-perspective survey of mental health consumer needs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 23(3):261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hesse-Biber S., Leavy P. (2004). Distinguishing qualitative research. In: Hesse-Biber S., Leavy P. (eds). Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–15Google Scholar
  16. Mellman T., Miller A., Weissman E., Crismon E.L., Essock S., Marder S. (2001). Evidence-based pharmogologic treatment for people wiht severe mental illness: A focus on guidelines and algorithms. Psychiatric Services 52(5):619–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morgan D. (2004). Focus Groups. In: Hesse-Biber S., Leavy P. (eds). Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 263–285Google Scholar
  18. Morgan D., Krueger R. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In: Morgan D. (eds). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage, pp. 3–19Google Scholar
  19. Mueser K., Corrigan P.W., Hilton D., Tanzman B., Schaub A., Gingerich S., Essock S.M., Tarrier N., Morey B., Vogel-Scibilia S., Herz M.I. (2002). Illness management and recovery: A review of the research. Psychiatric Services 53(10):1272–1284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muhr T. (1994). ATLAS/ti manual: Computer aided text interpretation and theory building. Berlin, AuthorGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullen, E. J. (2002). Evidence-based social work-theory and practice: Historical and reflective perspective. Retrieved April 1, 2003, from
  22. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. (2004). Blueprint for change: State reform plan 2004 for the Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services. Raleigh, NCGoogle Scholar
  23. Padgett D. (2004). Coming of age. In: Padgett D. (eds). The qualitative research experience. Belmont, CA Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, pp. 297–315Google Scholar
  24. Phillips S., Burns B., Edgar E., Mueser K., Linkins K., Rosenheck R.A., Drake R.E., McDonel Herr E.C. (2001). Moving assertive community treatment into standard practice. Psychiatric Services 52(6):771–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogers S., Danley K. (1994). The residential needs and preferences of persons with serious mental illness. Journal of Mental Health Administration 21(1):42–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sadler J. Fulford B. (2004). Should patients and their families contribute to the DSM process. Psychiatric Services 55:133–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tanenbaum S. (2003). Evidence-based practice in mental health: Practical weaknesses meet political strengths. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9(2):287–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Scheyett
    • 1
  • Erin McCarthy
    • 2
  • Christina Rausch
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Durham County Department of Social ServicesChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.NC Bridging Science and ServiceChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations