Community Mental Health Journal

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 223–228 | Cite as

Psychiatric Disposition of Patients Brought in by Crisis Intervention Team Police Officers

  • Gordon Strauss
  • Mark Glenn
  • Padma Reddi
  • Irfan Afaq
  • Anna Podolskaya
  • Tatyana Rybakova
  • Osman Saeed
  • Vital Shah
  • Baljit Singh
  • Andrew Skinner
  • Rif S. El-Mallakh

Abstract

Background: As part of an effort to improve police interactions with mentally ill citizens, and improve mental health care delivery to subjects in acute distress, the University of Louisville, in conjunction with the Louisville Metro Police, established the crisis intervention team (CIT). CIT is composed of uniformed officers who receive extensive training in crisis intervention and psychiatric issues and who are preferentially called to investigate police calls that may involve a mentally ill individual. Methods: In an effort to determine the characteristics of the individuals brought to the emergency psychiatric service (EPS) by CIT officers, a comparative (CIT vs. mental inquest warrant [MIW, a citizen-initiated court order to bring someone for psychiatric evaluation because of concerns regarding dangerousness] vs non-CIT/non-MIW), descriptive evaluation was performed. Results: With the exception of a higher rate of schizophrenic subjects brought in by CIT (43.0% vs. 22.1, non-CIT, P=.002), the demographics, diagnosis, and disposition of CIT-referred subjects were not different in any way from non-CIT patients. Subjects referred on MIWs were more likely to be admitted to a psychiatric hospital than non-MIW patients (71.6 vs. 34.8, P <.0001), but CIT-referred hospitalization rates were not different from hospitalization rates of self-referred subjects (20.7 vs. 33.3, ns). Conclusions: CIT officers appear to do a good job at identifying patients in need of psychiatric care.

Keywords

crisis intervention team (CIT) emergency psychiatry police 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borum, R., Deane, M., Steadman, H., Morrissey, J. 1998Police perspectives on responding to mentally ill people in crisis: Perceptions of program effectivenessBehavioral Science and Law16393405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DuPont, R., Cochren, S. 2000Police response to mental health emergencies—barriers to changeJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law28338344Google Scholar
  3. El-Mallakh, R.S., Wulfman, G., Smock, W., Blaser, E. 2003Implementation of a crisis intervention program for police response to mental health emergencies in LouisvilleJournal of the Kentucky Medical Association101241243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Klinkenberg, W.D., Caslyn, R.J. 1999Predictors of receiving aftercare 1, 3, and 18 months after a psychiatric emergency room visitPsychiatric Quarterly703951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Steadman, H.J. 1992Boundry spanners: A key component for the effective interactions of justice and mental health systemsLaw and Human Behavior167587Google Scholar
  6. Steadman, H.J., Deane, M.W., Borum, R., Morrissey, J. 2000Comparing outcomes of major models of police responses to mental health emergenciesPsychiatric Services51645648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Steadman, H.J., Morrissey, J.P., Braff, J.,  et al. 1986Psychiatric evaluations of police referrals in a general hospital emergency roomInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry83947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon Strauss
    • 1
  • Mark Glenn
    • 1
  • Padma Reddi
    • 1
  • Irfan Afaq
    • 1
  • Anna Podolskaya
    • 1
  • Tatyana Rybakova
    • 1
  • Osman Saeed
    • 1
  • Vital Shah
    • 1
  • Baljit Singh
    • 1
  • Andrew Skinner
    • 1
  • Rif S. El-Mallakh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Louisville School of MedicineLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations