Skip to main content
Log in

Inclusion of variable characteristic length in microemulsion flash calculations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent developments in predicting microemulsion phase behavior for use in chemical flooding are based on the hydrophilic-lipophilic deviation (HLD) and net-average curvature (NAC) equation-of-state (EoS). The most advanced version of the HLD-NAC EoS assumes that the three-phase micelle characteristic length is constant as parameters like salinity and temperature vary. In this paper, we relax this assumption to improve the accuracy and thermodynamic consistency of these flash calculations. We introduce a variable characteristic length in the three-phase region based on experimental data that is monotonic with salinity or other formulation variables, such as temperature and pressure. The characteristic length at the boundary of the three-phase region is then used for flash calculations in the two-phase lobes for Winsor type I/II. The functional form of the characteristic length is made consistent with the Gibbs phase rule. The improved EoS can capture asymmetric phase behavior data around the optimum, whereas current HLD-NAC based models cannot. The variable characteristic length formulation also resolves the thermodynamic inconsistency of existing phase behavior models that give multiple solutions for the optimum. We show from experimental data and theory that the inverse of the characteristic length varies linearly with formulation variables. This important result means that it is easy to predict the characteristic length in the three-phase region, which also improves the estimation of surrounding two-phase lobes. The results show that the optimum solubilization ratio can change significantly by a factor of two when variable characteristic length is included as temperature and pressure change. This can in turn greatly impact the interfacial tension (IFT) at optimum. This improved physical understanding of microemulsion phase behavior should aid in the design of surfactant blends and improve recovery predictions in a chemical flooding simulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarra, M.G., Høiland, H., Skauge, A.: Phase behavior and salt partitioning in two-and three-phase anionic surfactant microemulsion systems: part I, phase behavior as a function of temperature. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 215(2), 201–215 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acosta, E.J.: The HLD–NAC equation of state for microemulsions formulated with nonionic alcohol ethoxylate and alkylphenol ethoxylate surfactants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 320(1), 193–204 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Acosta, E., Szekeres, E., Sabatini, D.A., Harwell, J.H.: Net-average curvature model for solubilization and supersolubilization in surfactant microemulsions. Langmuir. 19(1), 186–195 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anklam, M.R., Prud'Homme, R.K., Warr, G.G.: Shear thinning in ternary bicontinuous and water-in-oil microemulsions. AICHE J. 41(3), 677–682 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Austad, T., Strand, S.: Chemical flooding of oil reservoirs 4. Effects of temperature and pressure on the middle phase solubilization parameters close to optimum flood conditions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 108(2–3), 243–252 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barakat, Y., Fortney, L.N., Schechter, R.S., Wade, W.H., Yiv, S.H., Graciaa, A.: Criteria for structuring surfactants to maximize solubilization of oil and water: II. Alkyl benzene sodium sulfonates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 92(2), 561–574 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourrel, M., and Schechter, R. S.: Microemulsions and Related Systems: Formulation, Solvency, and Physical Properties. Editions Technip (2010)

  8. Broens, M., Unsal, E.: Emulsification kinetics during quasi-miscible flow in dead-end pores. Adv. Water Resour. 113, 13–22 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Camilleri, D., Fil, A., Pope, G.A., Rouse, B.A., Sepehrnoori, K.: Comparison of an improved compositional micellar/polymer simulator with laboratory core floods. SPE Reserv. Eng. 2(04), 441–451 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou, S.I., Bae, J.H.: Phase-behavior correlation for high-salinity surfactant formulations. SPE Reserv. Eng. 3(03), 778–790 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, H.T.: Factors determining emulsion type: Hydrophile—lipophile balance and beyond. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 91, 9–24 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Araujo Cavalcante Filho, J.S., Delshad, M., Sepehrnoori, K.: Estimation of foam–flow parameters for local equilibrium methods by use of steady-state flow experiments and optimization algorithms. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 21(01), 160–173 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Gennes, P.G., Taupin, C.: Microemulsions and the flexibility of oil/water interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 86(13), 2294–2304 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dria, M.A., Schechter, R.S., Lake, L.W.: An analysis of reservoir chemical treatments. SPE Prod. Eng. 3(01), 52–62 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh, S., Johns, R.T.: An equation-of-state model to predict surfactant/oil/brine-phase behavior. SPE J. 21(04), 1–106 (2016a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghosh, S., Johns, R.T.: Dimensionless equation of state to predict microemulsion phase behavior. Langmuir. 32(35), 8969–8979 (2016b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffin, W.C.: Classification of surface-active agents by ‘HLB’. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 1(5), 311–326 (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hand, D.B.: Dineric distribution. J. Phys. Chem. 34(9), 1961–2000 (1930)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Healy, R.N., Reed, R.L., Stenmark, D.G.: Multiphase microemulsion systems. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 16(03), 147–160 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huh, C.: Interfacial tensions and solubilizing ability of a microemulsion phase that coexists with oil and brine. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 71(2), 408–426 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jennings, A.A., Kirkner, D.J.: Instantaneous equilibrium approximation analysis. J. Hydraul. Eng. 110(12), 1700–1717 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khorsandi, S., Johns, R.T.: Robust flash calculation algorithm for microemulsion phase behavior. J. Surfactant Deterg. 19(6), 1273–1287 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khorsandi, S., and Johns, R. T.: Extension of HLD-NAC Flash Calculation Algorithm to Multicomponent Mixtures of Microemulsion and Excess Phases. Paper presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.2118/190207-MS

  24. Kilpatrick, P.K., Scriven, L.E., Davis, H.T.: Thermodynamic modeling of quaternary systems: oil/brine/surfactant/alcohol. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 25(03), 330–342 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krishnan, K., Chapman, B., Bates, F.S., Lodge, T.P., Almdal, K., Burghardt, W.R.: Effects of shear flow on a polymeric bicontinuous microemulsion: equilibrium and steady state behavior. J. Rheol. 46(2), 529–554 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magzymov, D., Purswani, P., Karpyn, Z.T., Johns, R.T.: Modeling the effect of reaction kinetics and dispersion during low-salinity Waterflooding. SPE J. 26(05), 3075–3093 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Magzymov, D., Qiao, C., and Johns, R. T.: Impact of Surfactant Mixtures on Microemulsion Phase Behavior. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE (2016). https://doi.org/10.2118/181651-MS

  28. Pope, G.A., Nelson, R.C.: A chemical flooding compositional simulator. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 18(05), 339–354 (1978)

  29. Rosen, M. J., Kunjappu, J.T: Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena. John Wiley & Sons (2012)

  30. Roshanfekr, M.: Effect of Pressure and Methane on Microemulsion Phase Behavior and its Impact on Surfactant-Polymer Flood Oil Recovery (University of Texas at Austin, Doctoral dissertation), http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-12-2548 (2010)

  31. Roshanfekr, M., Johns, R.T.: Prediction of optimum salinity and solubilization ratio for microemulsion phase behavior with live crude at reservoir pressure. Fluid Phase Equilib. 304(1–2), 52–60 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rossen, W.R., Brown, R.G., Davis, H.T., Prager, S., Scriven, L.E.: Thermodynamic modeling of pseudoternary phase behavior. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 22(06), 945–961 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rubinstein, M., Colby, R.H.: Polymer Physics (Vol. 23). Oxford university press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Salager, J.L., Marquez, N., Graciaa, A., Lachaise, J.: Partitioning of ethoxylated octylphenol surfactants in microemulsion− oil− water systems: influence of temperature and relation between partitioning coefficient and physicochemical formulation. Langmuir. 16(13), 5534–5539 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Salager, J.L., Morgan, J.C., Schechter, R.S., Wade, W.H., Vasquez, E.: Optimum formulation of surfactant/water/oil systems for minimum interfacial tension or phase behavior. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 19(02), 107–115 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sandler, S. I.: Chemical, Biochemical, and Engineering Thermodynamics. John Wiley and Sons (2017)

  37. Skauge, A., Fotland, P.: Effect of pressure and temperature on the phase behavior of microemulsions. SPE Reserv. Eng. 5(04), 601–608 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Somasundaran, P., Hanna, H.S.: Adsorption of sulfonates on reservoir rocks. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 19(04), 221–232 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Strey, R.: Microemulsion microstructure and interfacial curvature. Colloid Polym. Sci. 272(8), 1005–1019 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Trogus, F.J., Schechter, R.S., Pope, G.A., Wade, W.H.: Adsorption of mixed surfactant systems. J. Pet. Technol. 31(06), 769–778 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Unsal, E., Broens, M., Armstrong, R.T.: Pore scale dynamics of microemulsion formation. Langmuir. 32(28), 7096–7108 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Unsal, E., Rücker, M., Berg, S., Bartels, W.B., Bonnin, A.: Imaging of compositional gradients during in situ emulsification using X-ray micro-tomography. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 550, 159–169 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Widom, B.: Lattice model of microemulsions. J. Chem. Phys. 84(12), 6943–6954 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Winsor, P.A.: Hydrotropy, solubilisation and related emulsification processes. Trans. Faraday Soc. 44, 376–398 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu, W., Wang, P., Delshad, M., Wang, C., Pope, G. A., and Sharma, M. M.: Modeling Non-equilibrium Mass Transfer Effects for a Gas Condensate Field. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (1998). https://doi.org/10.2118/39746-MS

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the member companies of the Enhanced Oil Recovery JIP in the EMS Energy Institute, at the Pennsylvania State University for their financial support. The authors also greatly acknowledge the funding support from the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. Dr. Russell T. Johns holds the George E. Trimble Chair in Earth and Mineral Sciences at Penn State.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daulet Magzymov.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magzymov, D., Johns, R.T. Inclusion of variable characteristic length in microemulsion flash calculations. Comput Geosci 26, 995–1010 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10158-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10158-2

Keywords

Navigation