Abstract
Geostatistical seismic inversion uses stochastic sequential simulation and co-simulation as techniques to generate and perturb subsurface elastic models. These steps are computational demanding and, depending on the size of the inversion grid, time consuming. This paper introduces a technique to achieve considerable reductions in the consumption of computational resources of geostatistical seismic inversion without compromising the quality of the inverse elastic models. We achieve these improvements by reducing one of the dimensions of the data domain to a periodic function approximated by a Fourier series of n terms. Then, instead of simulating over the entire original data volume, in the original data domain, we simulate independently each term of the series over the area of interest. If the number of terms in the series is considerably smaller than the size of the collapsed data domain, then the computational overhead of the inversion procedure decreases. Symbolic regression is used to obtain automatically the approximation to the periodic function that captures the behavior of the property in the reduced dimension. The advantages related to the use of symbolic regression over alternative machine learning algorithms are discussed. We use the method to simulate acoustic impedance in a geostatistical seismic inversion of a synthetic dataset representing a hydrocarbon reservoir, where the true acoustic impedance model is available. Results demonstrate a considerable speedup over traditional methods while achieving similar performance in terms of the misfit between real and synthetic seismic and a good representation of the true impedance model. The frequency content of the resulting inverted data is discussed and compared with the one inferred from traditional methods, demonstrating an expected reduction of the high-frequency component.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azevedo, L., Nunes, R., Soares, A., Mundin, E.C., Neto, G.S.: Integration of well data into geostatistical seismic amplitude variation with angle inversion for facies estimation. Geophysics. 80(6), M113–M128 (2015)
Azevedo, L., Soares, A.: Geostatistical Methods for Reservoir Geophysics. Springer (2017)
Azevedo, L., Nunes, R., Soares, A., Neto, G.S., Martins, T.S.: Geostatistical seismic amplitude-versus-angle inversion. Geophys. Prospect. 66(S1), 116–131 (2018)
Bosch, M., Mukerji, T., Gonzalez, E.F.: Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review. Geophysics. 75(5), 75A165–75A176 (2010)
Buland, A., Omre, H.: Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics. 68(1), 185–198 (2003)
Deutsch, V.C, Journel, A.: GSLIB. Geostatistical Software Library and User Guide. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, (1992)
Dimitrakopoulos, R., Luo, X.: Generalized Sequential Gaussian Simulation on Group Size ν and Screen-Effect Approximations for Large Field Simulations. Math. Geol. 36(5), 567–591 (2004)
Doyen, P.: Seismic Reservoir Characterization: An Earth Modeling Perspective. EAGE, (2007)
Ferreirinha, T., Nunes, R., Azevedo, L., Soares, A., Pratas, F., Tomás, P., Roma, N.: Acceleration of stochastic seismic inversion in OpenCL-based heterogeneous platforms. Comput. Geosci. 78, 26–36 (2015)
de Figueiredo, L.P., Bordignon, F., Grana, D., Roisenberg, M., Rodrigues, B.B.: Impact of seismic-inversion parameters on reservoir pore volume and connectivity. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts (2018)
de Figueiredo, L., Grana, D., Roisenberg, M., Rodrigues, B.: Multimodal McMC meethod for non-linear petrophysical seismic inversion. Geophysics, Just-accepted Articles (2019).
González, E.F., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G.: Seismic inversion combining rock physics and multiple-point geostatistics. Geophysics. 73(1), R11–R21 (2008)
Grana, D., Della Rossa, E.: Probabilistic petrophysical properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion. Geophysics. 75(3), O21–O37 (2010)
Grana, D., Mukerji, T., Dvokin, J., Mavko, G.: Stochastic inversion of facies from seismic data based on sequential simulations and probability perturbation method. Geophysics. 77(4), M53–M72 (2012)
Grana, D., Fjeldstad, T., Omre, H.: Bayesian Gaussian mixture linear inversion for geophysical inverse problems. Math. Geosci. 49, 1–37 (2017)
Grujic, O., da Silva, C., Caers, J.: “Functional Approach to Data Mining, Forecasting, and Uncertainty Quantification in Unconventional Reservoirs,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (2015)
Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Le Ravalec-Dupin, M., Noetinger, B.: Optimization with the gradual deformation method. Math. Geol. 34(2), 125–142 (2002)
Liu, M., Grana, D.: Stochastic nonlinear inversion of seismic data for the estimation of petroelastic properties using the ensemble smoother and data reparameterization. Geophysics. 83(3), 1 MJ–1Z13 (208)
Mariethoz, G.: A general parallelization strategy for random path based geostatistical simulation methods. Comput. Geosci. 36(7), 953–958 (2010)
Menafoglio, A., Grujic, O., Caers, J.: Universal Kriging of functional data: Trace-variography vs cross-variography? Application to gas forecasting in unconventional shales. Spat. Stat. 15, 39–55 (2016)
Menafoglio, A., Secchi, P., Dalla Rosa, M.: A Universal Kriging predictor for spatially dependent functional data of a Hilbert Space. Electronic Journal of Statistics. 7, 2209–2240 (2013)
Nerini, D., Monestiez, P., Manté, C.: Cokriging for spatial functional data. J. Multivar. Anal. 101(2), 409–418 (2010)
Nunes, R., Almeida, J.A.: Parallelization of Sequential Gaussian, Indicator and Direct Simulation Algorithms. Comput. Geosci. 36(8), 1042–1052 (2010)
Ramsay, J.O., Silverman, B.W.: Functional data analysis. Springer (2006)
Reyes, A., Giraldo, R., Mateu, J.: Residual Kriging for Functional Spatial Prediction of Salinity Curves. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. 44(4), 798–809 (2015)
Russell, B.: Introduction to seismic inversion methods. SEG (1998).
Searson, D.P.: GPTIPS 2: an open-source software platform for symbolic data mining. in Handbook of Genetic Programming Applications. Springer, New York (2015)
Soares, A.: Direct Sequential Simulation and Cosimulation. Math. Geol. 33(8), 911–926 (2001)
Soares, A., Diet, J., Guerreiro, L.: Stochastic Inversion with a Global Perturbation Method, in EAGE Petroleum Geostatistics, Cascais (2007)
Soares, A., Nunes, R., Azevedo, L.: Integration of Uncertain Data in Geostatistical Modeling. Math. Geosci. 49(2), 253–273 (2017)
Sambridge, M.: Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm-I. Searching a parameter space. Geophys. J. Int. 138(2), 479–494 (1999)
Sen, M.K., Stoffa, P.L.: Nonlinear one dimensional seismic waveform inversion using simulated annealing. Geophysics. 56(10), 1624–1638 (1991)
Sen, M., Stoffa, P.: Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion: Elsevier Science Publ. Co., Inc. (1995)
Srinivasan, B.V., Duraiswami, R., Murtugudde, R.: Efficient kriging for real-time spatio-temporal interpolation. in 20th Conference on Probablility and Statistics in Atmospheric Sciences (2010).
Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier (1987)
Vardy, M.E.: Deriving shallow-water sediment properties using post-stack acoustic impedance inversion. Near Surface Geophysics. 13(2), 143–154 (2015)
Vargas, H., Caetano, H., Filipe, M.: Parallelization of Sequential Simulation Procedures. in EAGE Conference on Petroleum Geostatistics, Cascais, Portugal (2007)
Yang, X., Zhu, P.: Stochastic seismic inversion based on an improved local gradual deformation method. Comput. Geosci. 109, 75–86 (2017)
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the CERENA (strategic project FCT-UID/ECI/04028/2019). We also thank the two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor of Computational Geosciences for their comments that helped to improve the paper throughout the revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nunes, R., Azevedo, L. & Soares, A. Fast geostatistical seismic inversion coupling machine learning and Fourier decomposition. Comput Geosci 23, 1161–1172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09877-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09877-w