Abstract
Finite difference is the most widely used method for seismic wavefield modeling. However, most finite-difference implementations discretize the Earth model over a fixed grid interval. This can lead to irregular model geometries being represented by ‘staircase’ discretization, and potentially causes mispositioning of interfaces within the media. This misrepresentation is a major disadvantage to finite difference methods, especially if there exist strong and sharp contrasts in the physical properties along an interface. The discretization of undulated seabed bathymetry is a common example of such misrepresentation of the physical properties in finite-difference grids, as the seabed is often a particularly sharp interface owing to the rapid and considerable change in material properties between fluid seawater and solid rock. There are two issues typically involved with seabed modeling using finite difference methods: firstly, the travel times of reflections from the seabed are inaccurate as a consequence of its spatial mispositioning; secondly, artificial diffractions are generated by the staircase representation of dipping seabed bathymetry. In this paper, we propose a new method that provides a solution to these two issues by positioning sharp interfaces at fractional grid locations. To achieve this, the velocity model is first sampled in a model grid that allows the center of the seabed to be positioned at grid points, before being interpolated vertically onto a regular modeling grid using the windowed sinc function. This procedure allows undulated seabed bathymetry to be represented with improved accuracy during modeling. Numerical tests demonstrate that this method generates reflections with accurate travel times and effectively suppresses artificial diffractions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alford, R.M., Kelly, K.R., Boore, D.M.: Accuracy of finite-difference modeling of the acoustic wave equation. Geophysics 39(5), 834–842 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440470
Backus, G.E.: Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. J. Geophys. Res. 67(11), 4427–4440 (1962)
Baysal, E., Kosloff, D.D., Sherwood, J.W.C.: Reverse time migration. Geophysics 48(11), 1514–1524 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441434
Berkhout, A.J.: Seismic Migration Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wave Field Extrapolation. A. Theoretical aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1982)
Brown, D.: A note on the numerical solution of the wave equation with piecewise smooth coefficients. Math. Comput. 42(166), 369–391 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/2007591
Chung, E.T., Engquist, B.: Optimal discontinuous Galerkin methods for wave propagation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44(4), 2131–2158 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1137/050641193
Chung, E.T., Engquist, B.: Optimal discontinuous Galerkin methods for the acoustic wave equation in higher dimensions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47(4), 3820–3848 (2009)
Cohen, G., Fauqueux, S.: Mixed finite elements with mass-lumping for the transient wave equation. J. Comput. Acoust. 8(1), 171–188 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218396X0000011X
Chu, C., Stoffa, P.: Determination of finite-difference weights using scaled binomial windows. Geophysics 77(3), W17–W26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0336.1
Dumbser, M., Käser, M., de la Puente, J.: Arbitrary high-order finite volume schemes for seismic wave propagation on unstructured meshes in 2D and 3D. Geophys. J. Int. 171(2), 665–694 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03421.x
Etienne, V., Chaljub, E., Virieux, J., Glinsky, N.: An hp-adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite-element method for 3D elastic wave modeling. Geophys. J. Int. 183(2), 941–962 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04764.x
Fogarty, T.R., LeVeque, R.J.: High-resolution finite-volume methods for acoustic waves in periodic and random media. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 106(1), 17–28 (1999)
Fornberg, B.: The pseudospectral method: accurate representation of interfaces in elastic wave calculations. Geophysics 53(4), 625–637 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442497
Gardner, G., Gardner, L., Gregory, A.: Formation velocity and density—the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics 39(5), 770–780 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440465
He, X., Yang, D., Wu, H.: A weighted Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method for wavefield modeling. Geophys. J. Int. 200(3), 1389–1410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu487
Hestholm, S., Ruud, B.: 2D finite-difference elastic wave modeling including surface topography. Geophys. Prospect. 42(4), 371–390 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1994.tb00216.x
Hestholm, S., Ruud, B.: 3D finite difference elastic wave modeling including surface topography. Geophysics 63(2), 613–622 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444360
Hicks, G.: Arbitrary source and receiver positioning in finite-difference schemes using Kaiser windowed sinc functions. Geophysics 67(1), 156–165 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1451454
Hu, W.: An improved immersed boundary finite-difference method for seismic wave propagation modeling with arbitrary surface topography. Geophysics 81(5), T311–T322 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0094.1
Kaiser, J.K.: Nonrecursive digital filter design using the I0-sinh window function. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 20–23. IEEE (1974). Reprinted in Oppenheim, A. V. (ed.), Selected papers in digital signal processing, II. IEEE Press, 123–126 (1976)
Käser, M., Dumbser, M.: An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes—I. The two-dimensional isotropic case with external source terms. Geophys. J. Int. 166(2), 855–877 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03051.x
Komatitsch, D., Coute, F., Mora, P.: Tensorial formulation of the wave equation for modeling curved interfaces. Geophys. J. Int. 127(1), 156–168 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb01541.x
Komatitsch, D., Tsuboi, S., Tromp, J.: The spectral-element method in seismology. In: Seismic Earth: Array Analysis of Broadband Seismograms, pp. 205–227. American Geophysical Union (2013). https://doi.org/10.1029/157GM13
Komatitsch, D., Vilotte, J.-P.: The spectral element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88(2), 368–392 (1998)
Levander, A.R.: Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics 53(11), 1425–1436 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442422
LeVeque, R., Li, Z.: The immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31(4), 1019–1044 (1994)
Levin, S.A.: Principle of reverse-time migration. Geophysics 49(4), 581–583 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441693
Liu, Y.: Globally optimal finite-difference schemes based on least squares. Geophysics 78(4), T113–T132 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0480.1
Lombard, B., Piraux, J., Gelis, C., Virieux, J.: Free and smooth boundaries in 2-D finite-difference schemes for transient elastic waves. Geophys. J. Int. 172(1), 252–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03620.x
Lysmer, J., Drake, L.A.: A finite element method for seismology. Methods Comput. Phys. 11, 181–216 (1972)
Mansur, W. J., Brebbia, C. A.: Numerical implementation of the boundary elementmethod for two-dimensional transient scalar wave propagation problems. Appl. Math. Model 6(4), 299–306 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(82)80038-3
Mansur, W.J., Brebbia, C.A.: Formulation of the boundary element method for transient problems governed by the scalar wave equation. Appl. Math. Model. 6(4), 307–311 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(82)80039-5
McMechan, G.A.: Migration by extrapolation of time-dependent boundary values. Geophys. Prospect. 31(3), 413–420 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01060.x
Muir, F., Dellinger, J., Etgen, J., Nichols, D.: Modeling elastic fields across irregular boundaries. Geophysics 57(9), 1189–1193 (1992)
Mulder, W.A.: Higher-ordermass-lumped finite elements for the wave equation. J. Comput. Acoust. 9(2), 671–680 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218396X0100067X
Pratt, R.G.: Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain. Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics 64(3), 888–901 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444597
Pratt, R.G., Shipp, R.M.: Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain. Part 2: Fault delineation in sediments using crosshole data. Geophysics 64(3), 902–914 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444598
Rao, Y., Wang, Y.: Seismic waveform simulation with pseudo-orthogonal grids for irregular topographic models. Geophys. J. Int. 194(3), 1778–1788 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt190
Robertsson, J.O.A.: A numerical free-surface condition for elastic/viscoelastic finite-difference modeling in the presence of topography. Geophysics 61(5), 1921–1934 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444107
Schoenberg, M., Muir, F.: A calculus for finely layered anisotropic media. Geophysics 54(4), 581–589 (1989)
Symes, W., Terentyev, I.: Subgrid modeling via mass lumping in constant density acoustics. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009, pp. 2572–2576 (2009)
Symes, W.W., Vdovina, T.: Interface error analysis for numerical wave propagation. Comput. Geosci. 13(3), 363–371 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-008-9124-8
Tarantola, A.: Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics 49(7), 1259–1266 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441754
Virieux, J.: SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 49(11), 1933–1942 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441605
Virieux, J.: P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 51(4), 889–901 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442147
Vossen, R.v., Robertsson, J.O.A., Chapman, C.H.: Finite-difference modeling of wave propagation in a fluid–solid configuration. Geophysics 67(2), 618–624 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1468623
Wang, Y., Liang, W., Nashed, Z., Li, X., Liang, G., Yang, C.: Seismic modeling by optimizing regularized staggered-grid finite-difference operators using a time-space-domain dispersion-relationship-preserving method. Geophysics 79(4), T277–T285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0078.1
Warner, M. et al.: Anisotropic 3D full-waveform inversion. Geophysics 78(2), R59–R80 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0338.1
Whitmore, N.D.: Iterative depth migration by backward time propagation. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1983, pp. 382–385 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1893867
Wu, D., Yao, G., Cao, J., Wang, Y.: Least-squares RTM with L1 norm regularisation. J. Geophys. Eng. 13(4), 666–673 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/13/5/666
Yao, G., Wu, D., Debens, H.A.: Adaptive finite difference for seismic wavefield modeling in acoustic media. Sci. Rep. 6, 30302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30302
Yao, G., Jakubowicz, H.: Least-squares reverse-time migration in a matrix-based formulation. Geophys. Prospect. 64(3), 611–621 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12305
Yao, G., Wu, D.: 2015. Least-squares reverse-time migration for reflectivity imaging. Sci. China Earth Sci. 58(11), 1982–1992 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5143-1
Zhang C., Symes W.W.: Fourth order, full-stencil immersed interface method for elastic waves with discontinuous coefficients. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1998, pp. 1929–1932 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820315
Zhang, W., Chen, X.: Traction image method for irregular free surface boundaries in finite difference seismic wave simulation. Geophys. J. Int. 167(1), 337–353 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03113.x
Zhang, C., LeVeque, R.J.: The immersed interface method for acoustic wave equations with discontinuous coefficients. Wave Motion 25(3), 237–263 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2125(97)00046-2
Zhang, J., Liu, T.: Elastic wave modeling in 3D heterogeneous media: 3D grid method. Geophys. J. Int. 150(3), 780–799 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01743.x
Zhang, J., Yao, Z.: Optimized finite-difference operator for broadband seismic wave modeling. Geophysics 78(1), A13–A18 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0277.1
Zhang, W., Zhuang, Y., Chung, E.T.: A new spectral finite volume method for elastic wave modeling on unstructured meshes. Geophys. J. Int. 206(1), 292–307 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw148
Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, G.: A stable TTI reverse time migration and its implementation. Geophysics 76(3), WA3–WA11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3554411
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the editor’s and two anonymous reviewers’ very useful suggestions and comments to complete the literature reviews and the theory of this presented method.
Funding
This work was partially supported by the NSFC (Grant No. 41504106) State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting Grant (No. PRP/indep-3-1508), and Science Foundation of China University of petroleum, Beijing (No. 2462015YJRC012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, G., da Silva, N.V., Debens, H.A. et al. Accurate seabed modeling using finite difference methods. Comput Geosci 22, 469–484 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9705-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9705-5