Computational Geosciences

, Volume 18, Issue 3–4, pp 325–341 | Cite as

Numerical convergence study of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geomechanics

  • Andro MikelićEmail author
  • Bin Wang
  • Mary F. Wheeler


In this paper, we consider algorithms for modeling complex processes in porous media that include fluid and structure interactions. Numerous field applications would benefit from a better understanding and integration of porous flow and solid deformation. Important applications in environmental and petroleum engineering include carbon sequestration, surface subsidence, pore collapse, cavity generation, hydraulic fracturing, thermal fracturing, wellbore collapse, sand production, fault activation, and waste disposal, while similar issues arise in biosciences and chemical sciences as well. Here, we consider solving iteratively the coupling of flow and mechanics. We employ mixed finite element method for flow and a continuous Galerkin method for elasticity. For single-phase flow, we demonstrate the convergence and convergence rates for two widely used schemes, the undrained split and the fixed stress split. We discuss the extension of the fixed stress iterative coupling scheme to an equation of state compositional flow model coupled with elasticity and a single-phase poroelasticity model on general hexahedral grids. Computational results are presented.


Poroelasticity Iterative coupling Contraction mapping Compositional flow Multipoint flux mixed finite element method 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



A. Mikelić would like to thank the Institute for Computational Engineering and Science (ICES), UT Austin for hospitality in April 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012. The research by M. F. Wheeler and B. Wang were partially supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences through the DOE Energy Frontier Research Center: The Center for Frontiers of Subsurface Energy Security (CFSES) under contract no. DE-SC0001114. The authors would also like to thank Dr. B. Ganis and Dr. R. Liu for their help in setting up the unstructured grid example.


  1. 1.
    Abousleiman, Y., Cheng, A.H.D., Cui, L., Detournay, E., Roegiers, J.C.: Mandel’s problem revisited. Géotechnique 46, 187–195 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biot, M.A.: General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 155–164 (1941)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charlez, P.A.: Rock Mechanics: Theoretical Fundamentals, vol. 1. Editions Technip, Paris (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, H.Y., Teufel, L.W., Lee, R.L.: Coupled fluid flow and geomechanics in reservoir study—I. Theory and governing equations, paper SPE 30752 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, Dallas (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chin, L.Y., Raghavan, R., Thomas, L.Y.: Fully-coupled geomechanics and fluid-flow analysis of wells with stress-dependent permeability, paper SPE 48857 presented at the SPE International Conference and Exhibition, Beijing (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coussy, O.: Mechanics of Porous Continua. Wiley, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dean, R.H., Gai, X., Stone, C.M., Minkoff, S.E.: A comparison of techniques for coupling porous flow and geomechanics. SPE J. 11, 132–140 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dean, R.H., Schmidt, J.H.: Hydraulic-fracture predictions with a fully coupled geomechanical reservoir simulator. SPE J. 14, 707–714 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gai, X.: A coupled geomechanics and reservoir flow model in parallel computers. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geertsma, J.: The effect of fluid pressure decline on volumetric changes of porous rocks. Trans. AIME 210, 331–340 (1957)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Hypre user’s manual (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, J., Tchelepi, H.A., Juanes, R.: Stability, accuracy, and efficiency of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics. SPE J. 16(2), 249–262 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, J., Tchelepi, H.A., Juanes, R.: Rigorous coupling of geomechanics and multiphase flow with strong capillarity, paper SPE 141268 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lange, T., Shparlinski, I.E.: Distribution of some sequences of points on elliptic curves. J. Math. Cryptol. 1, 1–11 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, R.: Discontinuous Galerkin for mechanics. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mainguy, M., Longuemare, P.: Coupling fluid flow and rock mechanics: formulation of the partial coupling between reservoir and geomechanical simulators. Oil & Gas Sci. Technol. 57(4), 355–367 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mikelić, A., Wheeler, M.F.: Convergence of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geomechanics. Comput Geosci 17, 479–496 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pan, F.: Development and application of a coupled geomechanics model for a parallel compositional reservoir simulator. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pan, F., Sepehrnoori, K., Chin, L.Y.: A new solution procedure for a fully coupled geomechanics and compositional reservoir simulator, paper SPE 119029 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phillips, P.J., Wheeler, M.F.: A coupling of mixed and continuous Galerkin finite elements methods for poroelasticity I: The continuous in time case. Comput. Geosci. 11, 131–144 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raghavan, R., Chin, L.Y.: Productivity changes in reservoirs with stress-dependent permeability, SPE Reserv. Eval. & Eng. 7(4), 308–315 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Settari, A., Walters, D.A.: Advances in coupled geomechanics and reservoir modeling with applications to reservoir compaction, paper SPE 51927 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas, S.G.: On some problems in the simulation of flow and transport through porous media. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tran, D., Nghiem, L., Buchanan, L.: An overview of iterative coupling between geomechanical deformation and reservoir flow, paper SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA 97879 presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Canada (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wheeler, M.F., Xue, G., Yotov, I.: Accurate cell-centered discretizations for modeling multiphase flow in porous media on general hexahedral and simplicial grids. SPE J. 17(3), 779–793 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, X., Zienkiewicz, O.C.: Multiphase flow in deforming porous media and finite element solutions. Comput. Struct. 45(2), 211–227 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.Institut Camille JordanUniversité Lyon 1Villeurbanne CedexFrance
  3. 3.Center for Subsurface Modeling, The Institute for Computational Engineering and SciencesThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations