Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic data integration for structural modeling: model screening approach using a distance-based model parameterization

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel history-matching method where reservoir structure is inverted from dynamic fluid flow response. The proposed workflow consists of searching for models that match production history from a large set of prior structural model realizations. This prior set represents the reservoir structural uncertainty because of interpretation uncertainty on seismic sections. To make such a search effective, we introduce a parameter space defined with a “similarity distance” for accommodating this large set of realizations. The inverse solutions are found using a stochastic search method. Realistic reservoir examples are presented to prove the applicability of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thore, P., Shtuka, A., Lecour, M., Ait-Ettajer, T., Cognot, R.: Structural uncertainties: determination, management, and applications. Geophysics 67, 840–852 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lecour, M., Cognot, R., Duvinage, I., Thore, P., Dulac, J.-C.: Modeling of stochastic faults and fault networks in a structural uncertainty study. Pet. Geosci. 7(Supplement), 31–42 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Samson, P., Dubrule, O., Euler, N.: Quantifying the impact of structural uncertainties on gross-rock volume estimates. Paper presented at European 3-D Reservoir Modelling Conference, Stavanger, Norway, SPE 35535, 16–17 April (1996)

  4. Corre, B., Thore, P., de Feraudy, V., Vincent, G.: Integrated uncertainty assessment for project evaluation and risk analysis. Paper presented at SPE European Petroleum Conference, Paris, France, SPE 65205, 24–25 October (2000)

  5. Charles, T., Guéméné, J.M., Corre, B., Vincent, G., Dubrule, O.: Experience with the quantification of subsurface uncertainties. Paper presented at SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, SPE 68703, 17–19 April (2001)

  6. Holden, L., Mostad, P., Nielsen, B.F., Gjerde, J., Townsend, C., Ottesen, S.: Stochastic structural modeling. Math. Geology 35(8), 899–914 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Clapp, R.G.: Multiple realizations and data variance: successes and failures. Stanford Exploration Project Report 113 (2003)

  8. Clapp, R. G.: Multiple realizations: model variance and data uncertainty. Stanford Exploration Project Report 108 (2001)

  9. Grubb, H., Tura, A., Hanitzsch, C.: Estimating and interpreting uncertainty in migrated images and AVO attributes. Geophysics 66, 1280–1216 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rivenæs, J.C., Otterleti, C., Zachariassen, E., Dart, C., Sjoholm, J.: A 3D stochastic model integrating depth, fault and property uncertainty for planning robust wells, Njord Field, offshore Norway. Pet. Geosci. 11, 57–65 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki, S., Caers, J.: History matching with an uncertain geological scenario. Paper presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, SPE 102154, 24–27 September (2006)

  12. Earth Decision: GOCAD Earth Decision Suite 2.1 User Guide. Earth Decision, Houston TX (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, L., Caumon, G.: Perturbation of fault network geometry on a stratigraphic grid. In: Proceedings of the 26th Gocad Meeting, Nancy School of Geology, Nancy, France, 6–9 June (2006)

  14. Srivastava, R. M.: Reservoir characterization with probability field simulation. Paper presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, SPE24753, 4–7 October (1992)

  15. Sambridge, M.: Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm-I: searching a parameter space. Geophys. J. Int. 138(2), 479–494 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sambridge, M.: Geophysical inversion with a neighborhood algorithm-II: appraising the ensemble. Geophys. J. Int. 138(3), 727–746 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Demyanov, V., Subbey, S. Christie, M.: Uncertainty assessment in PUNQ-S3: neighbourhood algorithm framework for geostatistical modeling. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Cannes, France, 31 Aug–2 Sept (2004)

  18. Christie, M., Demyanov, V., Erbas, D.: Uncertainty qualification for porous media flows. J. Comp. Phys. 217(1), 143–158 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Huttenlocher, D.P., Klanderman, G.A., Rucklidgo, W.J.: Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance. IEEE Trans. PAMI 15, 850–863 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dubuisson, M. P., Jain, A. K.: A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, A, 566–568, Jerusalem, Israel, October 9–13 (1994)

  21. Caers, J.: History matching under training-image based geological constraints. SPE J. 8, (3), 218–226 (2003) (SPE paper no. 74716)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satomi Suzuki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, S., Caumon, G. & Caers, J. Dynamic data integration for structural modeling: model screening approach using a distance-based model parameterization. Comput Geosci 12, 105–119 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-007-9063-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-007-9063-9

Keywords

Navigation