Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The common ground in landscape effects on gene flow in two newt species in an agroecosystem

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maintaining habitat connectivity is crucial for maintaining genetic diversity and reducing the risk of inbreeding depression in numerous species. Human-modified habitats pose a threat to population persistence, particularly for amphibians that require both aquatic and terrestrial habitats and often exhibit low dispersal capacity. In this study, we investigated the genetic structure and variation of two sympatric newt species, Triturus cristatus and Lissotriton vulgaris, in an urbanized and agricultural landscape. Using a multiscale resistance modeling approach, we evaluated how landscape features affect gene flow in both species. Our results confirmed that the less abundant T. cristatus exhibited more genetically distinct demes than the more common L. vulgaris, which showed a more subtle structure. Additionally, levels of genetic variation were lower in T. cristatus than in L. vulgaris, but with a similar spatial distribution pattern across shared ponds. We found that the proportion of managed grassland in the study area played a major role in reducing the level of connectivity in both species. Furthermore, considering multiple spatial scales proved to be effective in improving the fit of the landscape resistance models, with the largest scale (900 m) providing the best fit. In T. cristatus, areas with low proportions of trees or high proportions of crop fields negatively affected genetic connectivity. Notably, resistance surfaces optimized for each species were highly correlated. The intensively managed grassland lacked the structural heterogeneity necessary for newts. Therefore, switching to a more traditional management approach in the landscape to increase spatial patchiness at the scale of dispersal would benefit both species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The genotypic data and non-smoothed rasters generated in this study are available in the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bk3j9kdhz.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank R. Van Heghe, A. Martens, K. Van der Aa, K. Van Laer, N. Van Hoyweghen, L. Verschaeve, A. Vanden Broeck and S. Neyrinck for their assistance in sampling. We are grateful for the support of the municipal environmental services of Temse and Kruibeke and for their assistance in informing the owners of the ponds of the sampling campaign. Specifically, we want to thank J. Mortier and E. van Vlassenrode to grant us access to the Mercator high-voltage substation of Elia, J. De Laender for providing official permission to sample the ponds in the provincial park Roomacker, and De Vlaamse Waterweg and all the other owners that kindly allowed us to visit their grounds multiple times. Finally, we like to acknowledge Natuurpunt for sharing data on the occurrences of the species included in this study from waarnemingen.be and from the Hyla-database (INBODATAVR-173). The constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KC and RS conceived the study design. KC wrote the original draft. KC conducted the analyses. All authors conducted field work. AVB conducted laboratory work. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Cox.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest or competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The sampling permit ANB BL FF V19-00209-212 was provided by the Agency for Nature and Forest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cox, K., Schepers, R., Van Breusegem, A. et al. The common ground in landscape effects on gene flow in two newt species in an agroecosystem. Conserv Genet 24, 807–826 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-023-01539-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-023-01539-w

Keywords

Navigation