Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic dynamics of a 11-year ex situ managed Itasenpara bitterling population

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  • 2 Altmetric

Abstract

EX situ conservation management is an effective method that conserves endangered species that are on the decline owing to anthropogenic alteration of natural habitats. This entails the management of a captive population while maintaining its genetic variability and preventing its adaptation to the captive environment. However, implementation of such efforts is largely limited to experimental animals and zoo-managed animals with pedigree information. In this study, ex situ management of endangered Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) was conducted, while practicing recommended conservation procedures, for the purpose of conserving this species. In this 11 year long study, we conducted multi-locus microsatellite DNA analyses to evaluate the genetic dynamics of an ex situ captive population of A. longipinnis, as well as the wild A. longipinnis population of the Kiso River. Genetic diversity generally varied between yearly cohorts in each of the captive sub-populations, and some showed a stable increasing trend with generations. When all sub-populations were considered as one population, genetic diversity was maintained at a high value, while effective population size generally reached target values, thereby preventing inbreeding. These results were achieved by maintaining multiple captive sub-populations and exchanging individuals between them. Simultaneously, the introduction of additional individuals from the wild population produced genetic variability in the captive population. These fluctuating patterns of genetic diversity in the captive A. longipinnis population were desirable compared to previously predicted values. Consequently, these findings show that the current ex situ conservation program is suitable for maintaining the genetic composition of the captive population of A. longipinnis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, YY, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Barbanti A, Martin C, Blumenthal JM, Boyle J, Broderik AC, Collyer L, Ebanks-Petrie G, Godley BJ, Mustin W, Ordóñez V, Pascual M, Carreras C (2019) How many came home? Evaluating ex situ conservation of green turtles in the Cayman Islands. Mol Ecol 28:1637–1651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi N, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996–2004) GENETIX 4.05, Logiciel Sous Windows TM Pour la Génétique des Populations. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France

  • Castric V, Bernatchez L, Belkhir K, Bonhomme F (2002) Heterozygote deficiencies in small lacustrine populations of brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill (Pisces, Salmonidae): a test of alternative hypotheses. Heredity 89:27–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson DA, Burland TM, Douglas A, Le Comber SC, Bradshaw M (2003) Isolation of microsatellite loci in the freshwater fish, the bitterling Rhodeus sericeus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:199–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resourc 4:359–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquharson KA, Hogg CJ, Grueber CE (2021) Offspring survival changes over generations of captive breeding. Nat Commun 12:3045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J (2005) The R commander: a basic-statistics graphical user interface to R. J Stat Softw 14:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol Ecol 17:325–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin IR, Frankham R (1998) How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential? Anim Conserv 1:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz AC, Bertouille S, Eloy MC, Licoppe A, Chaumont F, Flamand MC (2012) Comparative landscape genetic analyses show a Belgian motorway to be a gene flow barrier for red deer (Cervus elaphus), but not wild boars (Sus scrofa). Mol Ecol 21:3445–3457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyze spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Note 2:618–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa K, Kanao S, Miyazaki Y, Mukai T, Nakajima J, Takaku K, Taniguchi Y (2019) Acheilognathus longipinnis: the IUCN red list of threatened species 2019. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed on 7 July 2020

  • Ikeya K, Sagawa S, Ohara K (2012) The efforts of the ex situ conservation of endangered deep body bitterling in Nobi-Plain, Japan. Reintroduction 2:121–128 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeya K, Yamazaki OK, Kubo T (2021) Practice and future of ex situ conservation of endangered deep bodied bitterling in the Kiso River, Japan. Reintroduction 9:23–38 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2014) Guidelines on the use of ex situ management for species conservation: Version 2.0. IUCN Species Survival commission, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon HB, An J, Kweon SM, Kim S, Yu JN, Kim BJ, Kawase S, Suk HY (2016) Development of novel microsatellite loci and analyses of genetic diversity in the endangered Tanakia somjinensis. Bioch Syst Ecol 66:344–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MS, Black R (1984) The Wahlund effect and the geographical scale of variation in the intertidal limpet Siphonaria sp. Mar Biol 79:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-Rare: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson S, Mork J (2005) Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and temporal instability in allele frequencies at microsatellite loci in a local population of Atlantic cod. ICES J Marine Sci 62:1588–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitanishi S, Nishio M, Uehara K, Ogawa R, Yokoyama T, Edo K (2013) Patterns of genetic diversity of mitochondrial DNA within captive populations of the endangered itasenpara bitterling: implications for a reintroduction program. Environ Biol Fish 96:567–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman-Ruiz D, Soriano L, Casas-Marce M, Szychta C, Sánchez I, Fernández J, Godoy JA (2019) Genetic evaluation of the Iberian lynx ex situ conservation programme. Heredity 123:647–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman NM, Mayzel Z, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA, Mayrose I (2015) CLUMPAK: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Res 15:1179–1191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conserv Biol 1:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1995) Mutation and conservation. Conserv Biol 9:782–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leberg PL, Firmin BD (2008) Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol Ecol 17:334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Horvitz DG (1953) Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J Hum Genet 5:107–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery ME, Woodworth LM, England PR, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2010) Widespread selective sweeps affecting microsatellites in Drosophila populations adapting to captivity: Implications for captive breeding programs. Biol Conserv 143:1842–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet 7:783–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishio M, Soliman T, Yamazaki Y (2012) Occurrence and spawning locations of the Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) in the Moo River, Toyama, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 59:147–153 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishio M, Kawamoto T, Kawakami R, Edo K, Yamazaki Y (2015) Life history and reproductive ecology of the endangered Itasenpara bitterling Acheilognathus longipinnis (Cyprinidae) in the Himi region, central Japan. J Fish Biol 87:616–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa R (2008) Acheilognathus longipinnis: a symbol fish of flood plains with natural hydrometeorological environments. Jpn J Ichthyol 55:144–148 (in Japanese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki T, Watanabe M, Inamura O, Kitagawa T, Tabe M, Nagata Y (2006) Genetic relationships among regional populations of the deepbodied bitterling, Acheilognathus longipinnis, inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis. DNA Polymorph 14:276–280 (in Japanese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 153:945–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabier R, Robert A, Lacroix F, Lesobre L (2020) Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses. Zoo Biol 39:422–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical test. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roques S, Berrei P, Rochard E, Acolas ML (2018) Genetic monitoring for the successful re-stocking of a critically endangered diadromous fish with low diversity. Biol Conserv 221:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-López RERS, Espeso G, Gomendio M (2009) Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us? Mol Ecol 18:1352–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirai Y, Ikeda S, Tajima S (2009) Isolation and characterization of new microsatellite markers for rose bitterlings, Rhodeus ocellatus. Mol Ecol Res 9:1031–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin M (2008) Linkage disequilibrium—understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nat Rev Genet 9:477–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2012) Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data. Genetics 191:183–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby JR, Fernandez NB, Lamb MC, Ivy JA, Lacy RC, Dewoody A (2015) The impacts of inbreeding, drift and selection on genetic diversity in captive breeding populations. Mol Ecol 24:98–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Witzenberger KA, Hochkirch A (2011) Ex situ conservation genetics: a review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species. Biodivers Conserv 20:1843–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood J, Ballou JD, Callicrate T, Fant JB, Griffith MP, Kramer AT, Lacy RC, Meyer A, Sullivan S, Traylor-Holzer K, Walsh SK, Havens K (2021) Applying the zoo model to conservation of threatened exceptional plant species. Conserv Biol 34:1416–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright BR, Hogg CJ, McLennan EA, Belov K, Grueber CE (2021) Assessing evolutionary processes over time in a conservation breeding program: a combined approach using molecular data, simulations and pedigree analysis. Biodivers Conserv 30:1011–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Nakamura T, Nishio M (2010) Genetic population structures of the Itasenpara bitterling, Acheilognathus longipinnis, in the Toyama and Osaka regions. Jpn J Ichthyol 57:143–148 (in Japanese with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Ikeya K, Goto T, Chimura Y (2017) Population viability analysis predicts decreasing genetic diversity in ex-situ populations of the Itasenpara bitterling Acheilognathus longipinnis from the Kiso River, Japan. Ichthyol Res 64:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Uehara K, Ikea K, Nishio M (2020) Interpopulational and intrapopulational genetic diversity of the endangered Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) with reference to its demographic history. Conserv Genet 21:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Kitamura J, Ikeya K, Mori S (2021) Fine-scale genetic structure of the endangered bitterling in the middle river basin of the Kiso River, Japan. Genetica 149:179–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the members of the Gifu World Freshwater Aquarium, the Gifu Prefectural Research Institute for Fisheries and Aquatic Environments, the Hekinan Seaside Aquarium, and the Higashiyama Zoo and Botanical Garden for their support in rearing fish and completing the experiments. We also thank the Conservation Council for Itasenpara (endangered bitterling) of the Kiso River System, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), and the Ministry of the Environment of Japan. This research was carried out as part of the program for Rehabilitation of Natural Habitats and Maintenance of Viable Population for Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) by the Chubu Regional Environment Office, Ministry of the Environment. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YY completed laboratory work and data analysis, performed the research, and wrote the manuscript. KI corresponded with the administrative agency regarding collection permission, and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Yamazaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted with respect for the conservation of the target endangered species. The DNA sample used was a part of the fin extracted from an individual, and the individual was continued to captive.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10592_2022_1484_MOESM1_ESM.pptx

Frequency distribution of pairwise relatedness coefficients among individuals of five ex situ captive sub-populations and one wild population of Acheilognathus longipinnis derived from the Kiso River. Population abbreviations are shown in Table 1. Supplementary file1 (PPTX 173 KB)

10592_2022_1484_MOESM2_ESM.pptx

Two-dimensional plot of microsatellite allele composition based on axis one and three of ex situ captive and wild Acheilognathus longipinnis populations in the Kiso River for cohort levels assessed via factorial correspondence analysis. Supplementary file2 (PPTX 42 KB)

10592_2022_1484_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx

Allele frequency, probability of departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P), genetic diversity, and composition of clusters by STRUCTURE software with K = 2 and K = 5 for five ex situ captive sub-populations and one wild population of Acheilognathus longipinnis. Supplementary file3 (XLSX 39 KB)

10592_2022_1484_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx

Pairwise FST estimates (below diagonal) of ex situ captive sub-populations and one wild population of Acheilognathus longipinnis. Supplementary file4 (XLSX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamazaki, Y., Ikeya, K. Genetic dynamics of a 11-year ex situ managed Itasenpara bitterling population. Conserv Genet 24, 73–83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-022-01484-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-022-01484-0

Keywords

Navigation