Abstract
EX situ conservation management is an effective method that conserves endangered species that are on the decline owing to anthropogenic alteration of natural habitats. This entails the management of a captive population while maintaining its genetic variability and preventing its adaptation to the captive environment. However, implementation of such efforts is largely limited to experimental animals and zoo-managed animals with pedigree information. In this study, ex situ management of endangered Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) was conducted, while practicing recommended conservation procedures, for the purpose of conserving this species. In this 11 year long study, we conducted multi-locus microsatellite DNA analyses to evaluate the genetic dynamics of an ex situ captive population of A. longipinnis, as well as the wild A. longipinnis population of the Kiso River. Genetic diversity generally varied between yearly cohorts in each of the captive sub-populations, and some showed a stable increasing trend with generations. When all sub-populations were considered as one population, genetic diversity was maintained at a high value, while effective population size generally reached target values, thereby preventing inbreeding. These results were achieved by maintaining multiple captive sub-populations and exchanging individuals between them. Simultaneously, the introduction of additional individuals from the wild population produced genetic variability in the captive population. These fluctuating patterns of genetic diversity in the captive A. longipinnis population were desirable compared to previously predicted values. Consequently, these findings show that the current ex situ conservation program is suitable for maintaining the genetic composition of the captive population of A. longipinnis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, YY, upon reasonable request.
References
Barbanti A, Martin C, Blumenthal JM, Boyle J, Broderik AC, Collyer L, Ebanks-Petrie G, Godley BJ, Mustin W, Ordóñez V, Pascual M, Carreras C (2019) How many came home? Evaluating ex situ conservation of green turtles in the Cayman Islands. Mol Ecol 28:1637–1651
Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi N, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996–2004) GENETIX 4.05, Logiciel Sous Windows TM Pour la Génétique des Populations. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France
Castric V, Bernatchez L, Belkhir K, Bonhomme F (2002) Heterozygote deficiencies in small lacustrine populations of brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill (Pisces, Salmonidae): a test of alternative hypotheses. Heredity 89:27–35
Dawson DA, Burland TM, Douglas A, Le Comber SC, Bradshaw M (2003) Isolation of microsatellite loci in the freshwater fish, the bitterling Rhodeus sericeus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:199–202
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resourc 4:359–361
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567
Farquharson KA, Hogg CJ, Grueber CE (2021) Offspring survival changes over generations of captive breeding. Nat Commun 12:3045
Fox J (2005) The R commander: a basic-statistics graphical user interface to R. J Stat Softw 14:1–42
Frankham R (2008) Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol Ecol 17:325–333
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Franklin IR, Frankham R (1998) How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential? Anim Conserv 1:69–73
Frantz AC, Bertouille S, Eloy MC, Licoppe A, Chaumont F, Flamand MC (2012) Comparative landscape genetic analyses show a Belgian motorway to be a gene flow barrier for red deer (Cervus elaphus), but not wild boars (Sus scrofa). Mol Ecol 21:3445–3457
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyze spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Note 2:618–620
Hasegawa K, Kanao S, Miyazaki Y, Mukai T, Nakajima J, Takaku K, Taniguchi Y (2019) Acheilognathus longipinnis: the IUCN red list of threatened species 2019. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed on 7 July 2020
Ikeya K, Sagawa S, Ohara K (2012) The efforts of the ex situ conservation of endangered deep body bitterling in Nobi-Plain, Japan. Reintroduction 2:121–128 (in Japanese)
Ikeya K, Yamazaki OK, Kubo T (2021) Practice and future of ex situ conservation of endangered deep bodied bitterling in the Kiso River, Japan. Reintroduction 9:23–38 (in Japanese with English abstract)
IUCN (2014) Guidelines on the use of ex situ management for species conservation: Version 2.0. IUCN Species Survival commission, Gland, Switzerland
Jeon HB, An J, Kweon SM, Kim S, Yu JN, Kim BJ, Kawase S, Suk HY (2016) Development of novel microsatellite loci and analyses of genetic diversity in the endangered Tanakia somjinensis. Bioch Syst Ecol 66:344–350
Johnson MS, Black R (1984) The Wahlund effect and the geographical scale of variation in the intertidal limpet Siphonaria sp. Mar Biol 79:295–302
Kalinowski ST (2005) HP-Rare: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189
Karlsson S, Mork J (2005) Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and temporal instability in allele frequencies at microsatellite loci in a local population of Atlantic cod. ICES J Marine Sci 62:1588–1596
Kitanishi S, Nishio M, Uehara K, Ogawa R, Yokoyama T, Edo K (2013) Patterns of genetic diversity of mitochondrial DNA within captive populations of the endangered itasenpara bitterling: implications for a reintroduction program. Environ Biol Fish 96:567–572
Kleinman-Ruiz D, Soriano L, Casas-Marce M, Szychta C, Sánchez I, Fernández J, Godoy JA (2019) Genetic evaluation of the Iberian lynx ex situ conservation programme. Heredity 123:647–661
Kopelman NM, Mayzel Z, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA, Mayrose I (2015) CLUMPAK: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Res 15:1179–1191
Lacy RC (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conserv Biol 1:143–158
Lande R (1995) Mutation and conservation. Conserv Biol 9:782–791
Leberg PL, Firmin BD (2008) Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol Ecol 17:334–343
Li CC, Horvitz DG (1953) Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J Hum Genet 5:107–117
Montgomery ME, Woodworth LM, England PR, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2010) Widespread selective sweeps affecting microsatellites in Drosophila populations adapting to captivity: Implications for captive breeding programs. Biol Conserv 143:1842–1849
Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet 7:783–787
Nishio M, Soliman T, Yamazaki Y (2012) Occurrence and spawning locations of the Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) in the Moo River, Toyama, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 59:147–153 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Nishio M, Kawamoto T, Kawakami R, Edo K, Yamazaki Y (2015) Life history and reproductive ecology of the endangered Itasenpara bitterling Acheilognathus longipinnis (Cyprinidae) in the Himi region, central Japan. J Fish Biol 87:616–633
Ogawa R (2008) Acheilognathus longipinnis: a symbol fish of flood plains with natural hydrometeorological environments. Jpn J Ichthyol 55:144–148 (in Japanese with English Abstract)
Okazaki T, Watanabe M, Inamura O, Kitagawa T, Tabe M, Nagata Y (2006) Genetic relationships among regional populations of the deepbodied bitterling, Acheilognathus longipinnis, inferred from mitochondrial DNA analysis. DNA Polymorph 14:276–280 (in Japanese)
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 153:945–959
Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275
Rabier R, Robert A, Lacroix F, Lesobre L (2020) Genetic assessment of a conservation breeding program of the houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata undulata) in Morocco, based on pedigree and molecular analyses. Zoo Biol 39:422–435
Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical test. Evolution 43:223–225
Roques S, Berrei P, Rochard E, Acolas ML (2018) Genetic monitoring for the successful re-stocking of a critically endangered diadromous fish with low diversity. Biol Conserv 221:91–102
Ruiz-López RERS, Espeso G, Gomendio M (2009) Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us? Mol Ecol 18:1352–1364
Shirai Y, Ikeda S, Tajima S (2009) Isolation and characterization of new microsatellite markers for rose bitterlings, Rhodeus ocellatus. Mol Ecol Res 9:1031–1033
Slatkin M (2008) Linkage disequilibrium—understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nat Rev Genet 9:477–485
Wang J (2012) Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data. Genetics 191:183–194
Willoughby JR, Fernandez NB, Lamb MC, Ivy JA, Lacy RC, Dewoody A (2015) The impacts of inbreeding, drift and selection on genetic diversity in captive breeding populations. Mol Ecol 24:98–110
Witzenberger KA, Hochkirch A (2011) Ex situ conservation genetics: a review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species. Biodivers Conserv 20:1843–1861
Wood J, Ballou JD, Callicrate T, Fant JB, Griffith MP, Kramer AT, Lacy RC, Meyer A, Sullivan S, Traylor-Holzer K, Walsh SK, Havens K (2021) Applying the zoo model to conservation of threatened exceptional plant species. Conserv Biol 34:1416–1425
Wright BR, Hogg CJ, McLennan EA, Belov K, Grueber CE (2021) Assessing evolutionary processes over time in a conservation breeding program: a combined approach using molecular data, simulations and pedigree analysis. Biodivers Conserv 30:1011–1029
Yamazaki Y, Nakamura T, Nishio M (2010) Genetic population structures of the Itasenpara bitterling, Acheilognathus longipinnis, in the Toyama and Osaka regions. Jpn J Ichthyol 57:143–148 (in Japanese with English Abstract)
Yamazaki Y, Ikeya K, Goto T, Chimura Y (2017) Population viability analysis predicts decreasing genetic diversity in ex-situ populations of the Itasenpara bitterling Acheilognathus longipinnis from the Kiso River, Japan. Ichthyol Res 64:54–63
Yamazaki Y, Uehara K, Ikea K, Nishio M (2020) Interpopulational and intrapopulational genetic diversity of the endangered Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) with reference to its demographic history. Conserv Genet 21:55–64
Yamazaki Y, Kitamura J, Ikeya K, Mori S (2021) Fine-scale genetic structure of the endangered bitterling in the middle river basin of the Kiso River, Japan. Genetica 149:179–190
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the members of the Gifu World Freshwater Aquarium, the Gifu Prefectural Research Institute for Fisheries and Aquatic Environments, the Hekinan Seaside Aquarium, and the Higashiyama Zoo and Botanical Garden for their support in rearing fish and completing the experiments. We also thank the Conservation Council for Itasenpara (endangered bitterling) of the Kiso River System, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), and the Ministry of the Environment of Japan. This research was carried out as part of the program for Rehabilitation of Natural Habitats and Maintenance of Viable Population for Itasenpara bitterling (Acheilognathus longipinnis) by the Chubu Regional Environment Office, Ministry of the Environment. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YY completed laboratory work and data analysis, performed the research, and wrote the manuscript. KI corresponded with the administrative agency regarding collection permission, and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted with respect for the conservation of the target endangered species. The DNA sample used was a part of the fin extracted from an individual, and the individual was continued to captive.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10592_2022_1484_MOESM1_ESM.pptx
Frequency distribution of pairwise relatedness coefficients among individuals of five ex situ captive sub-populations and one wild population of Acheilognathus longipinnis derived from the Kiso River. Population abbreviations are shown in Table 1. Supplementary file1 (PPTX 173 KB)
10592_2022_1484_MOESM2_ESM.pptx
Two-dimensional plot of microsatellite allele composition based on axis one and three of ex situ captive and wild Acheilognathus longipinnis populations in the Kiso River for cohort levels assessed via factorial correspondence analysis. Supplementary file2 (PPTX 42 KB)
10592_2022_1484_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Allele frequency, probability of departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P), genetic diversity, and composition of clusters by STRUCTURE software with K = 2 and K = 5 for five ex situ captive sub-populations and one wild population of Acheilognathus longipinnis. Supplementary file3 (XLSX 39 KB)
10592_2022_1484_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx
Pairwise FST estimates (below diagonal) of ex situ captive sub-populations and one wild population of Acheilognathus longipinnis. Supplementary file4 (XLSX 18 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yamazaki, Y., Ikeya, K. Genetic dynamics of a 11-year ex situ managed Itasenpara bitterling population. Conserv Genet 24, 73–83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-022-01484-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-022-01484-0