Abstract
Despite the global crisis facing migratory benthic fishes, conservation genetic knowledge of these species remains scarce. In this study, we conducted a population genetic analysis using seven microsatellite loci to obtain basic information for determining conservation units and priorities of Cottus hangiongensis in Shiretoko, a mountainous peninsula where sculpin habitats are thought to be in decline throughout the region. The genetic structure was clearly divided between west and east coastal populations, and there was little recent migration between them. The western populations, which are closer to the center of the species’ range, had significantly higher genetic diversity than the eastern populations. However, a bottleneck analysis and the inference of demographic history using approximate Bayesian computation showed that only the west group had experienced a significant recent bottleneck, probably due to recent habitat losses. These results suggest that the western and eastern populations should be different conservation units and that the western populations should be prioritized for conservation despite their high genetic diversity. This study contributes to the conservation genetics of diadromous sculpin and reiterates the importance of analyzing not only the current levels but also temporal changes in assessing genetic diversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Genotype data generated in this study is available at Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17429417).
References
Baek SY, Kang JH, Jo SH et al (2018) Contrasting life histories contribute to divergent patterns of genetic diversity and population connectivity in freshwater sculpin fishes. BMC Evol Biol 18:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1171-8
Dennenmoser S, Rogers SM, Vamosi SM (2014) Genetic population structure in prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) reflects isolation-by-environment between two life-history ecotypes. Biol J Linn Soc 113:943–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12384
Dennenmoser S, Vamosi SM, Nolte AW, Rogers SM (2017) Adaptive genomic divergence under high gene flow between freshwater and brackish-water ecotypes of prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) revealed by Pool-Seq. Mol Ecol 26:25–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13805
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221895
Englbrecht CC, Largiadèr CR, Hänfling B, Tautz D (1999) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the European bullhead Cottus gobio L. (Osteichthyes) and their applicability to related taxa. Mol Ecol 8:1966–1969. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00778-6.x
Estoup A, Angers B (1998) Microsatellites and minisatellites for molecular ecology: theoretical and empirical consideration. In: Carvalho G (ed) Advances in molecular ecology. NATO Press, Amsterdam, Holland, pp 55–86
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
Goto A (1981) Life history and distibution of a River Sculpin, Cottus hangiongensis. Bull Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ 32:10–21 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Goto A (1984) Comparative ecology of young-of-the-year between two amphidromous species of Cottus in Hokkaido: 1. Upstream migration and growth. Bull Fish Sci Hokkaido Univ 35:133–143
Goto A, Yokoyama R, Sideleva VG (2015) Evolutionary diversification in freshwater sculpins (Cottoidea): a review of two major adaptive radiations. Environ Biol Fishes 98:307–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-014-0262-7
Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486
Hänfling B, Weetman D (2006) Concordant genetic estimators of migration reveal anthropogenically enhanced source-sink population structure in the river sculpin, Cottus gobio. Genetics 173:1487–1501. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.054296
Hohenlohe PA, Funk WC, Rajora OP (2021) Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management. Mol Ecol 30:62–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15720
Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332
Junker J, Peter A, Wagner CE et al (2012) River fragmentation increases localized population genetic structure and enhances asymmetry of dispersal in bullhead (Cottus gobio). Conserv Genet 13:545–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-011-0306-x
Kanno K, Onikura N, Kurita Y et al (2018) Morphological, distributional, and genetic characteristics of Cottus pollux in the Kyushu Island, Japan: indication of fluvial and amphidromous life histories within a single lineage. Ichthyol Res 65:462–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-018-0637-4
Kitagawa T, Muraoka K, Nakamura K, Goto A (2021) Environmental preference of juvenile amphidromous Cottus fishes in brackish-water river mouth. Ecol Civ Eng 24:27–38. https://doi.org/10.3825/ece.21-00002 (in Japanese)
Kopelman NM, Mayzel J, Jakobsson M et al (2015) Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Resour 15:1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12387
Laikre L, Hoban S, Bruford MW et al (2020) Post-2020 goals overlook genetic diversity. Science 367:1083–1085. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2748
Limburg KE, Waldman JR (2009) Dramatic declines in north Atlantic diadromous fishes. BioScience 59:955–965. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.7
Lucek K, Keller I, Nolte AW, Seehausen O (2018) Distinct colonization waves underlie the diversification of the freshwater sculpin (Cottus gobio) in the Central European Alpine region. J Evol Biol 31:1254–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13339
Meirmans PG, Hedrick PW (2011) Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol Ecol Resour 11:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02927.x
Micheletti SJ, Storfer A (2015) A test of the central–marginal hypothesis using population genetics and ecological niche modelling in an endemic salamander (Ambystoma barbouri). Mol Ecol 24:967–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13083
Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan (2020) Red List of Japan. Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst Biol 51:238–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150252899752
Mota M, Rochard E, Antunes C (2016) Status of the diadromous fish of the Iberian Peninsula: past, present and trends. Limnetica 35:1–18. https://doi.org/10.23818/limn.35.01
Mukai T, Nakamura S, Nishida M (2009) Genetic population structure of a reef goby, Bathygobius cocosensis, in the northwestern Pacific. Ichthyol Res 56:380–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-009-0111-4
Mussmann SM, Douglas MR, Chafin TK, Douglas ME (2019) BA3-SNPs: contemporary migration reconfigured in BayesAss for next-generation sequence data. Methods Ecol Evol 10:1808–1813. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13252
Nakajima S, Hirota SK, Matsuo A et al (2020) Genetic structure and population demography of white-spotted charr in the upstream watershed of a large dam. Water 12:2406. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092406
Nakajima S, Sueyoshi M, Hirota SK et al (2021) A strategic sampling design revealed the local genetic structure of cold-water fluvial sculpin: a focus on groundwater-dependent water temperature heterogeneity. Heredity 127:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-021-00468-z
Nakamura F, Komiyama E (2010) A challenge to dam improvement for the protection of both salmon and human livelihood in Shiretoko, Japan’s third Natural Heritage Site. Landsc Ecol Eng 6:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-009-0083-6
National Institute of Biological Resources (2011) Red data book of endangered fishes in Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon
Navascués M, Leblois R, Burgarella C (2017) Demographic inference through approximate-Bayesian-computation skyline plots. PeerJ 5:e3530. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3530
Nolte AW, Stemshorn KC, Tautz D (2005) Direct cloning of microsatellite loci from Cottus gobio through a simplified enrichment procedure. Mol Ecol Notes 5:628–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01026.x
Nunziata SO, Lance SL, Scott DE et al (2017) Genomic data detect corresponding signatures of population size change on an ecological time scale in two salamander species. Mol Ecol 26:1060–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13988
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/90.4.502
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9788-0
Reusch TBH, Ehlers A, Hammerli A, Worm B (2005) Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2826–2831. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500008102
Roni P, Hanson K, Beechie T (2008) Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North Am J Fish Manag 28:856–890. https://doi.org/10.1577/m06-169.1
Ruppert JLW, James PMA, Taylor EB et al (2017) Riverscape genetic structure of a threatened and dispersal limited freshwater species, the Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.). Conserv Genet 18:925–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-017-0938-6
Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004) Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15261–15264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403809101
Takahashi G, Kuwahara T, Yamakawa M (2005) Dams in the Shiretoko Peninsula-issues in river management and environmental conservation. Jpn J Conserv Ecol 10:139–149. https://doi.org/10.18960/hozen.10.2_139 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Takahashi Y, Suyama Y, Matsuki Y et al (2016) Lack of genetic variation prevents adaptation at the geographic range margin in a damselfly. Mol Ecol 25:4450–4460. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13782
Takizawa T (1982) Characteristics of the Soya warm current in the Okhotsk sea. J Oceanogr Soc Jpn 38:281–292
Teixeira JC, Huber CD (2021) The inflated significance of neutral genetic diversity in conservation genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2015096118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015096118
Terui A, Miyazaki Y (2017) Combined effects of immigration potential and habitat quality on diadromous fishes. Limnology 18:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-016-0495-6
Tsukagoshi H, Sakai K, Yamamoto K, Goto A (2013) Non-indigenous amphidromous sculpin Cottus pollux small-egg type (Teleostei: Cottidae) detected in rivers entering the Sea of Japan off Honshu Island, Japan. Ichthyol Res 60:93–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-012-0316-9
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408641
Willi Y, Kristensen TN, Sgrò CM et al (2022) Conservation genetics as a management tool: the five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2105076119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105076119
Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191
Xiao Y, Zhang Y, Yanagimoto T et al (2011) Population genetic structure of the point-head flounder, Cleisthenes herzensteini, in the Northwestern Pacific. Genetica 139:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-010-9536-y
Yamakawa U, Kaneko S, Imai R et al (2019) Development of microsatellite markers for the endangered sleeper Eleotris oxycephala (Perciformes: Eleotridae). Genes Genet Syst 94:219–224. https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.19-00007
Yue GH, David L, Orban L (2007) Mutation rate and pattern of microsatellites in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Genetica 129:329–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-006-0003-8
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Takahiro Nobetsu and Taihei Yamada for providing us with local information. We also thank Kaiji Suzuki for his help in the field sampling and Uchu Yamakawa for his advice on ocean currents.
Funding
This study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant Number 21H03647).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YA, SN, and FN conceived and designed the study. YA performed the field sampling. YA and SN performed the laboratory work. SN analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, with contributions from YA and FN. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Aoki, Y., Nakajima, S. & Nakamura, F. Genetic structure and diversity of amphidromous sculpin in Shiretoko, a mountainous peninsula in Japan. Conserv Genet 23, 1063–1071 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-022-01472-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-022-01472-4