This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and material
Abascal F, Corvelo A, Cruz F, Villanueva-Cañas JL, Vlasova A, Marcet-Houben M et al (2016) Extreme genomic erosion after recurrent demographic bottlenecks in the highly endangered Iberian lynx. Genome Biol 17:1–19
Allendorf FW, Luikart G, Aitken SN (2013) Conservation and the Genetics of Populations, 2a edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK
Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229
Bürger R, Wagner GP, Stettinger F (1998) How much heritable variation can be maintained in finite populations by mutation–selection balance? Evolution 43:1748–1766
Caballero A (2020) Quantitative Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Caballero A, García-Dorado A (2013) Allelic diversity and its implications for the rate of adaptation. Genetics 195:1373–1384
Caballero A, Villanueva B, Druet T (2020) On the estimation of inbreeding depression using different measures of inbreeding from molecular markers. Evol Appl 14:416–428
Castro-Prieto A, Wachter B, Sommer S (2011) Cheetah paradigm revisited: MHC diversity in the World’s largest free-ranging population. Mol Biol Evol 28:1455–1468
Davydov EV, Goode DL, Sirota M, Cooper GM, Sidow A (2010) Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++. PLoS Comput Biol 6:1001025
Frankham R (1980) The founder effect and response to artificial selection in Drosophila. In: Robertson A (ed) Selection Experiments in Laboratory and Domestic Animals. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, Slough, England, pp 87–90
Frankham R (2012) How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination. Heredity 108:167–178
Frankham R (2015) Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Mol Ecol 24:2610–2618
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to Conservation Genetics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Ralls K, Eldridge MDB, Dudash MR, Fenster CB, Sunnucks P (2019) A Practical Guide for Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
García-Dorado A (2003) Tolerant versus sensitive genomes: the impact of deleterious mutation on fitness and conservation. Conserv Genet 4:311–324
García-Dorado A (2007) Shortcut predictions for fitness properties at the MSD balance and for its build-up after size reduction under different management strategies. Genetics 176:983–997
García-Dorado A (2012) Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: Inbreeding, purging, mutations, and standard selection. Genetics 190:1461–1476
García-Dorado A (2015) On the consequences of ignoring purging on genetic recommendations for minimum viable population rules. Heredity 115:185–187
García-Dorado A, Avila V, Sánchez-Molano E, Manrique A, López-Fanjul C (2007) The build up of mutation–selection–drift balance in laboratory Drosophila populations. Evolution 61:653–665
Hedrick PW, García-Dorado A (2016) Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 31:940–952
Hill WG, Rasbash J (1986) Models of long term artificial selection in finite populations. Genet Res 48:41–50
James JW (1970) The founder effect and response to artificial selection. Genet Res 16:241–250
Kardos M, Åkesson M, Fountain T, Flagstad Ø, Liberg O, Olason P et al (2018) Genomic consequences of intensive inbreeding in an isolated wolf population. Nat Ecol Evol 2:124–131
Kyriazis CC, Wayne RK, Lohmueller KE (2020) Strongly deleterious mutations are a primary determinant of extinction risk due to inbreeding depression. Evol Lett 5:33–47
Latter BDH, Mulley JC, Reid D et al (1995) Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139:287–297
Mittell EA, Nakagawa S, Hadfield JD (2015) Are molecular markers useful predictors of adaptive potential? Ecol Lett 18:772–778
Morin PA, Archer FI, Avila CD, Balacco JR, Bukhman YV, Chow W et al (2021) Reference genome and demographic history of the most endangered marine mammal, the vaquita. Mol Ecol Resour 21:1008–1020
Ørsted M, Hoffmann AA, Sverrisdóttir E, Nielsen KL, Kristensen TN (2019) Genomic variation predicts adaptive evolutionary responses better than population bottleneck history. Plos Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008205
Pérez-Pereira N, Pouso R, Rus A, Vilas A, López-Cortegano E, García-Dorado A, Quesada H, Caballero A (2021). Long-term exhaustion of the inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, submitted.
Ralls K, Sunnucks P, Lacy RC, Frankham R (2020) Genetic rescue: A critique of the evidence supports maximizing genetic diversity rather than minimizing the introduction of putatively harmful genetic variation. Biol Conserv 251:108784
Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237
Reed DH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (2003) Inbreeding and extinction: The effect of environmental stress and lineage. Conserv Genet 3:301–307
Robertson A (1960) A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 153:234–249
Robinson JA, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Fan Z, Kim BY, Marsden CD, Lohmueller KE, Wayne RK (2016) Genomic flatlining in the endangered island fox. Curr Biol 26(9):1183–1189
Sabeti PC, Varilly P, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Hostetter E et al (2007) Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 449:913–918
Santiago E, Novo I, Pardiñas AF, Saura M, Wang J, Caballero A (2020) Recent Demographic history inferred by high-resolution analysis of linkage disequilibrium. Mol Biol Evol 37:3642–3653
Santos J, Pascual M, Simões P, Fragata I et al (2012) From nature to the laboratory: the impact of founder effects on adaptation. J Evol Biol 25:2607–2622
Teixeira JC, Huber CD (2021) The inflated significance of neutral genetic diversity in conservation genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2015096118
Vilas A, Pérez-Figueroa A, Quesada H, Caballero A (2015) Allelic diversity for neutral markers retains a higher adaptive potential for quantitative traits than expected heterozygosity. Mol Ecol 24:4419–4432
Van der Valk T, de Manuel M, Marques-Bonet T, Guschanski K (2019). Estimates of genetic load in small populations suggest extensive purging of deleterious alleles. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/696831.
Westbury MV, Hartmann S, Barlow A, Wiesel I, Leo V, Welch R et al (2018) Extended and continuous decline in effective population size results in low genomic diversity in the world’s rarest hyena species, the brown hyena. Mol Biol Evol 35:1225–1237
Woodworth LM, Montgomery ME, Briscoe DA et al (2002) Rapid genetic deterioration in captivity: Causes and conservation implications. Conserv Genet 3:277–288
We thank Dick Frankham, Mike Bruford and an anonymous referee for useful comments on the manuscript.
PGC2018-095810-B-I00 and CGL2016-75904-C2-1-P, PID2020-114426 GB-C21 from Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, MINECO, Spanish Government), Xunta de Galicia (ED431C 2016–037) and Fondos Feder: “Unha maneira de facer Europa”.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
Consent for publication
All authors have approved the manuscript for publication.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
García-Dorado, A., Caballero, A. Neutral genetic diversity as a useful tool for conservation biology. Conserv Genet 22, 541–545 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-021-01384-9