Abstract
Habitat fragmentation from urban development leaves species vulnerable to inbreeding depression and genomic erosion. Restoring gene flow can reduce inbreeding and preserve genetic diversity, but a common concern is that genomic incompatibilities may lead to outbreeding depression. The introduction of deleterious genetic load is less commonly considered. The endangered Pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus) persists in three isolated populations in southern California. Mitochondrial and microsatellite data indicated that effective population sizes were extremely small (Ne< 50), and continued declines prompted a conservation breeding program founded by individuals from each population. We tracked genetic diversity and individual fitness (measured by reproductive success) in a captive setting over six generations of admixture. Although we observed an increase in fitness in the F1 and F2 generations relative to the founding populations, inbreeding depression alone did not explain the fitness patterns, and outbreeding depression was difficult to rule out as reproductive success waned after F2. However, reproductive success was consistently higher in admixed individuals than founders from Dana Point, the smallest population with the lowest heterozygosity. Across generations, we saw a strong negative correlation between individual reproductive success and ancestry to Dana Point, leading to a rapid decrease of Dana Point alleles. Although the genomic underpinnings remain to be determined, reduced fitness associated with Dana Point ancestry is consistent with high deleterious genetic load in this population, and thus any facilitated migration should be unidirectional. Our findings highlight that, even in the absence of outbreeding depression, there may be a cost to restoration of gene flow if populations harbor high genetic load.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Alexander LF, Riddle BR (2005) Phylogenetics of the New World rodent family Heteromyidae. J Mammal 86:366–379
Barmentlo SH, Meirmans PG, Luijten SH et al (2018) Outbreeding depression and breeding system evolution in small, remnant populations of Primula vulgaris: consequences for genetic rescue. Conserv Genet 19:545–554
Brehme CS, Adsit-Morris DT, Edgarian TK, Fisher RN (2018) Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton Pacific Pocket Mouse Monitoring Results and Trend Analysis for 2017
Brehme CS, Adsit-Morris DT, Tracey JA et al (2017) Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton Pacific Pocket Mouse Monitoring Results for 2016: 5-year Trend Analysis and Monitoring Program Evaluation. MCB, Camp Pendleton. DRAFT Prepared for Environmental Security Department, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton
Brylski PV, Hays L, Avery J (1998) Pacific Pocket Mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus) Recover Plan
Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621
Coulon A (2010) GENHET: an easy-to-use R function to estimate individual heterozygosity. Mol Ecol Resour 10:167–169
David P, Pujol B, Viard F et al (2007) Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol Ecol 16:2474–2487
de Oliveira AK, Cordeiro AR (1980) Adaptation of Drosophila willistoni experimental populations to extreme pH medium. Heredity 44:111
Edmands S (2007) Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol 16:463–75
Egan SP, Funk DJ (2009) Ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric host forms of Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19426–19431
Ehiobu NG, Goddard ME (1990) Heterosis in crosses between geographically separated populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Theor Appl Genet 80:569–575
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Fenster CB, Galloway LF (2000) Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Conserv Biol 14:1406–1412
Frankham R (2015) Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Mol Ecol 24:2610–8
Frankham R (2016) Genetic rescue benefits persist to at least the F3 generation, based on a meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 195:33–36
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MDB et al (2011) Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 25:465–475
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Ralls K et al (2017) Genetic management of fragmented animal and plant populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Frankham R, Bradshaw CJA, Brook BW (2014) Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol Conserv 170:56–63
French NR, Maza BG, Aschwanden AP (1967) Life spans of Dipodomys and Perognathus in the Mojave Desert. J Mammal 48:537–548
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620
Harris K, Nielsen R (2016) The genetic cost of Neanderthal introgression. Genetics 203:881–891
Hayden P, Gambino J, Lindberg RG (1966) Laboratory breeding of the little pocket mouse Perognathus longimembris. J Mammal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1377682
Hedrick PW, Adams JR, Vucetich JA (2011) Reevaluating and broadening the definition of genetic rescue. Conserv Biol 25:1069–1070
Hedrick PW, Fredrickson R (2010) Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conserv Genet 11:615–626
Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A (2016) Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 31:940–952
Ivy JA, Miller A, Lacy RC, Dewoody JA (2009) Methods and prospects for using molecular data in captive breeding programs: an empirical example using parma wallabies (Macropus parma). J Hered 100:441–454
Johnson WE, Onorato DP, Roelke ME et al (2010) Genetic restoration of the Florida panther. Science 329:1641–1645
Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403
Juric I, Aeschbacher S, Coop G (2016) The strength of selection against Neanderthal introgression. PLoS Genet 12:e1006340
Kardos M, Taylor HR, Ellegren H et al (2016) Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild. Evol Ecol 9:1205–1218
Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A et al (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6196–6200
Kopelman NM, Mayzel J, Jakobsson M et al (2015) Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Resour 15:1179–1191
Kyriazis CC, Wayne RK, Lohmueller KE (2019) High genetic diversity can contribute to extinction in small populations. bioRxiv 678524
Lacy RC, Ballou JD, Pollak JP (2012) PMx: software package for demographic and genetic analysis and management of pedigreed populations. Methods Ecol Evol 3:433–437
Lynch M (1991) The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45:622–629
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Madsen T, Shine R, Olsson M, Wittzell H (1999) Restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/46941
McKnight ML, Lee MR (2006) Karyotypic variation in the pocket mice Perognathus amplus and P. longimembris. J Mammal 73:625–629
Miller JM, Poissant J, Hogg JT, Coltman DW (2012) Genomic consequences of genetic rescue in an insular population of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Mol Ecol 21:1583–1596
Oliver T, Schmidt B, Nathan D et al (2005) Using reconfigurable hardware to accelerate multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW. Bioinformatics 21:3431–3432
Paradis E (2010) Pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics 26:419–420
Patton JL (1967) Chromosome studies of certain pocket mice genus Perognathus (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). J Mammal 48:27–37
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Ralls K, Ballou JD, Dudash MR et al (2018) Call for a paradigm shift in the genetic management of fragmented populations. Conserv Lett 11:1–6
Robinson JA, Räikkönen J, Vucetich LM et al (2019) Genomic signatures of extensive inbreeding in Isle Royale wolves, a population on the threshold of extinction. Sci Adv 5:eaau0757
Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106
Rundle HD (2002) A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 56:322–329
Service USF (1994) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of endangered status for the Pacific Pocket Mouse. Fed Regist 59:49752–49764
Service USF and W (1998) Pacific Pocket Mouse (Perognathus logimembris pacificus) recovery plan
Service USF and W (2010) Pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus) 5-year review: summary and evaluation
Shier DM (2014) Captive breeding, anti-predator behavior and reintroduction of the Pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus) for the years 2012–2014
Shier DM (2017) Captive breeding, anti-predator behavior and reintroduction of the pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus): 2015 Annual Report with revised genetics section
Spencer WD (2005a) Recovery research for the endangered Pacific pocket mouse: an overview of collaborative studies. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report
Spencer WD (2005b) Recovery research for the endangered Pacific pocket mouse: an overview of collaborative studies. Planning in Biodiversity Bringing Research Management Together 107
Spencer WD, Schaefer C, Dodd S et al (2001) Pacific pocketmouse studies program. Phase III report, final
Spencer WD, Schaefer C, Dodd S et al (2000) Pacific pocket mouse studies program; Phase II report. Foothill/Eastern Transp. Corridor Agency US Fish Wildl. Serv. 44 pp
Stoffel MA, Esser M, Kardos M et al (2016) inbreedR: an R package for the analysis of inbreeding based on genetic markers. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1331–1339
Swei A, Brylski PV, Spencer WD et al (2003) Hierarchical genetic structure in fragmented populations of the little pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris) in southern California. Conserv Genet 4:501–514
Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P (2010) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal. Evol Int J Org Evol 64:1202–1217
Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595
Tallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS (2004) The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 19:489–496
Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:631
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO‐CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538
Wang J (2011) COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Mol Ecol Resour 11:141–145
Waples RS, Do CHI (2008) LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Resour 8:753–756
Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA et al (1998) Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science 282:1695
Whiteley AR, Fitzpatrick SW, Funk WC, Tallmon DA (2015) Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 30:42–9
Whitlock R, Stewart GB, Goodman SJ et al (2013) A systematic review of phenotypic responses to between-population outbreeding. Environ Evid 2:13
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by California Department of Fish and Wildlife Traditional Sect. 6 Program, United States Fish and Wildlife Service contract F15AC00734 and San Diego Zoo Global. We thank Mark Pavelka, Shauna Dodd, Maryke Swartz, Amaranta Kozuch, and Cheryl Brehme for sampling PPM, and Jamie Ivy for breeding recommendations in the conservation breeding program. We thank Sarah Hendricks, Rachel Chock and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that greatly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilder, A.P., Navarro, A.Y., King, S.N.D. et al. Fitness costs associated with ancestry to isolated populations of an endangered species. Conserv Genet 21, 589–601 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-020-01272-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-020-01272-8


