Body size, inbreeding, and lifespan in domestic dogs

Abstract

Inbreeding poses a real or potential threat to nearly every species of conservation concern. Inbreeding leads to loss of diversity at the individual level, which can cause inbreeding depression, and at the population level, which can hinder ability to respond to a changing environment. In closed populations such as endangered species and ex situ breeding programs, some degree of inbreeding is inevitable. It is therefore vital to understand how different patterns of breeding and inbreeding can affect fitness in real animals. Domestic dogs provide an excellent model, showing dramatic variation in degree of inbreeding and in lifespan, an important aspect of fitness that is known to be impacted by inbreeding in other species. There is a strong negative correlation between body size and lifespan in dogs, but it is unknown whether the higher rate of aging in large dogs is due to body size per se or some other factor associated with large size. We used dense genome-wide SNP array data to calculate average inbreeding for over 100 dog breeds based on autozygous segment length and found that large breeds tend to have higher coefficients of inbreeding than small breeds. We then used data from the Veterinary medical Database and other published sources to estimate life expectancies for pure and mixed breed dogs. When controlling for size, variation in inbreeding was not associated with life expectancy across breeds. When comparing mixed versus purebred dogs, however, mixed breed dogs lived about 1.2 years longer on average than size-matched purebred dogs. Furthermore, individual pedigree coefficients of inbreeding and lifespans for over 9000 golden retrievers showed that inbreeding does negatively impact lifespan at the individual level. Registration data from the American Kennel Club suggest that the molecular inbreeding patterns observed in purebred dogs result from specific breeding practices and/or founder effects and not the current population size. Our results suggest that recent inbreeding, as reflected in variation within a breed, is more likely to affect fitness than historic inbreeding, as reflected in variation among breeds. Our results also indicate that occasional outcrosses, as in mixed breed dogs, can have a substantial positive effect on fitness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Abegglen LM, Caulin AF, Chan A et al (2015) Potential mechanisms for cancer resistance in elephants and comparative cellular response to DNA damage in humans. JAMA 314:1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.13134

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Austad SN, Fischer KE (2016) Sex differences in lifespan. Cell Metab 23:1022–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.019

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bannasch D, Young A, Myers J et al (2010) Localization of canine brachycephaly using an across breed mapping approach. PLoS ONE 5:e9632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009632

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellumori TP, Famula TR, Bannasch DL et al (2013) Prevalence of inherited disorders among mixed-breed and purebred dogs: 27,254 cases (1995–2010). J Am Vet Med Assoc 242:1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.242.11.1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernaerts F, Talavera J, Leemans J et al (2010) Description of original endoscopic findings and respiratory functional assessment using barometric whole-body plethysmography in dogs suffering from brachycephalic airway obstruction syndrome. Vet J 183:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernardi G (1988) Longevity and morbidity in the Irish wolfhound in the United States—1966 to 1986. Harp Hound 1:78–84

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borge KS, Tønnessen R, Nødtvedt A, Indrebø A (2011) Litter size at birth in purebred dogs-A retrospective study of 224 breeds. Theriogenology 75:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyko AR, Boyko RH, Boyko CM et al (2009) Complex population structure in African village dogs and its implications for inferring dog domestication history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:13903–13908. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902129106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyko AR, Quignon P, Li L et al (2010) A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs. PLoS Biol 8:49–50. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000451

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brosnahan MM, Paradis MR (2003) Demographic and clinical characteristics of geriatric horses: 467 cases (1989-1999). J Am Vet Med Assoc 223:93–98. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Calder WA (1984) Size, function, and life history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cassinello J (2005) Inbreeding depression on reproductive performance and survival in captive gazelles of great conservation value. Biol Conserv 122:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daniels TJ, Bekoff M (1989) Population and social biology of free-ranging dogs, Canis familiaris. J Mammal 70:754–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication. D. Appleton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delaneau O, Marchini J, Zagury J-F (2012) A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes. Nat Methods 9:179–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1785

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dobson JM (2013) Breed-predispositions to cancer in pedigree dogs. ISRN Vet Sci 2013:941275. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/941275

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Eigenmann JE, Patterson DF, Froesch ER (1984) Body size parallels insulin-like growth factor I levels but not growth hormone secretory capacity. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 106:448–453

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fay JC, Wu CI (2000) Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155:1405–1413

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fitzpatrick JL, Evans JP (2009) Reduced heterozygosity impairs sperm quality in endangered mammals. Biol Lett 5:320–323. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0734

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleming JM, Creevy KE, Promislow DEL (2011) Mortality in North American dogs from 1984 to 2004: an investigation into age-, size-, and breed-related causes of death. J Vet Intern Med 25:187–198

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Genoscoper Laboratories Oy MyDogDNA Technical Sheet–Design, Technology, and Performance Data

  22. Galis F, Van Der Sluijs I, Van Dooren TJM et al (2007) Do large dogs die young? J Exp Zool B 308B:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilmore KM, Greer KA (2015) Why is the dog an ideal model for aging research? Exp Gerontol 71:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2015.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Greer KA, Canterberry SC, Murphy KE (2007) Statistical analysis regarding the effects of height and weight on life span of the domestic dog. Res Vet Sci 82:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gusev A, Lowe JK, Stoffel M et al (2009) Whole population, genome-wide mapping of hidden relatedness. Genome Res 19:318–326. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.081398.108

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayward J, Castelhano M, Oliveira K et al (2016) Complex disease and phenotype mapping in the domestic dog. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10460

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hedrick PW, Kalinowski ST (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoffman JM, Creevy KE, Promislow DEL (2013) Reproductive capability is associated with lifespan and cause of death in companion dogs. PLoS ONE 8:e61082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061082

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hollingsworth MJ, Smith JM (1955) The effects of inbreeding on rate of development and on fertility in Drosophila subobscura. J Genet 53:295–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02993984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Holzenberger M, Dupont J, Ducos B et al (2003) IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature 421:182–187

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hughes AL, Yeager M (1998) Natural selection at major histocompatibility complex loci of vertebrates. Annu Rev Genet 32:415–435. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.415

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hyde RR (1913) Inheritance of the length of life in Drosophila. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 23:113–123

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kaeberlein M, Creevy KE, Promislow DEL (2016) The dog aging project: translational geroscience in companion animals. Mamm Genome. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-016-9638-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Khlat M, Khoury M (1991) Inbreeding and diseases: demographic, genetic, and epidemiologic perspectives. Epidemiol Rev 13:28–41

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Klein JP, Moeschberger LP (2003) Survival analysis: statistical methods for censored and truncated data. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kraus C, Pavard S, Promislow DEL (2013) The size-life span trade-off decomposed: why large dogs die young. Am Nat 181:492–505. https://doi.org/10.1086/669665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Larson G, Karlsson EK, Perri A et al (2012) Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8878–8883. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203005109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Leroy G (2011) Genetic diversity, inbreeding and breeding practices in dogs: results from pedigree analyses. Vet J 189:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Leroy G (2014) Inbreeding depression in livestock species: review and meta-analysis. Anim Genet 45:618–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12178

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Marsden CD, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, O’Brien DP et al (2016) Bottlenecks and selective sweeps during domestication have increased deleterious genetic variation in dogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:152–157. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512501113

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Michell AR (1999) Longevity of British breeds of dog and its relationships with sex, size, cardiovascular variables and disease. Vet Rec 145:625–629. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.145.22.625

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller RA, Austad SN (2005) Growth and aging. Why do big dogs die young? Handb Biol Aging. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088387-5/50022-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Miller RA, Harper JM, Galecki A, Burke DT (2002) Big mice die young: early life body weight predicts longevity in genetically heterogeneous mice. Aging Cell 1:22–29

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. O’Neill DG, Church DB, McGreevy PD et al (2013) Longevity and mortality of owned dogs in England. Vet J 198:638–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Olsson M, Meadows JRS, Truvé K et al (2011) A novel unstable duplication upstream of HAS2 predisposes to a breed-defining skin phenotype and a periodic fever syndrome in Chinese Shar-Pei dogs. PLoS Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Patronek GJ, Waters DJ, Glickman LT (1997) Comparative longevity of pet dogs and humans: implications for gerontology research. J Gerontol A 52:B1717–B1718

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pearl R, Parker SL, Gonzalez BM (1923) Experimental studies on the duration of life. VII. The Mendelian inheritance of duration of life in crosses of wild type and quintuple stocks of Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat 57:153–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Peters RH (1986) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  49. Peto R (1977) Epidemiology, multistage models, and short-term mutagenicity tests. Orig Hum Cancer 4:1403–1428

    Google Scholar 

  50. Poncet CM, Dupre GP, Freiche VG et al (2005) Prevalence of gastrointestinal tract lesions in 73 brachycephalic dogs with upper respiratory syndrome. J Small Anim Pract 46:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2005.tb00320.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Proschowsky HF, Rugbjerg H, Ersbùll AK (2003) Mortality of purebred and mixed-breed dogs in Denmark. Prev Vet Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00010-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing

  53. Read AF, Harvey PH (1989) Life history differences among the eutherian radiations. J Zool 219:329–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02584.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rowell JL, McCarthy DO, Alvarez CE (2011) Dog models of naturally occurring cancer. Trends Mol Med 17:380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2011.02.004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Saint Bernard Club of America (1993) SBCA Health Survey. Saint Fancier 59–73

  56. Samaras TT, Elrick H, Storms LH (2003) Is height related to longevity? Life Sci 72:1781–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(02)02503-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sewalem A, Kistemaker GJ, Miglior F, Van Doormaal BJ (2006) Analysis of inbreeding and its relationship with functional longevity in Canadian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 89:2210–2216. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72291-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Shannon LM, Boyko RH, Castelhano M et al (2015) Genetic structure in village dogs reveals a Central Asian domestication origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:13639–13644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516215112

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sutter NB, Eberle MA, Parker HG et al (2004) Extensive and breed-specific linkage disequilibrium in Canis familiaris extensive and breed-specific linkage disequilibrium in Canis familiaris. Genome Res. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3147604

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Sutter NB, Bustamante CD, Chase K et al (2007) A single IGF1 allele is a major determinant of small size in dogs. Science (80-) 316:112–115

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tryfonidou MA, Holl MS, Vastenburg M et al (2003) Hormonal regulation of calcium homeostasis in two breeds of dogs during growth at different rates. J Anim Sci 81:1568–1580

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Van Oosterhout CC, Zijlstra WG, van Heuven MK, Brakefield PM (2000) Inbreeding depression and genetic load in laboratory metapopulations of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evolution (NY) 1:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wayne RK, Ostrander EA (1999) Origin, genetic diversity, and genome structure of the domestic dog. BioEssays 21:247–257

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Young JK, Olson KA, Sukh Amgalanbaatar RP, Berger J (2011) Is wildlife goint to the dogs? Impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. Bioscience 61:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam R. Boyko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Adam Boyko is the co-founder and Chief Science Officer of Embark Veterinary.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 30 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 26869 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yordy, J., Kraus, C., Hayward, J.J. et al. Body size, inbreeding, and lifespan in domestic dogs. Conserv Genet 21, 137–148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-019-01240-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Domestic dog
  • Inbreeding
  • Canine aging
  • Lifespan