Advertisement

The conservation genomics of the endangered distylous gypsophile Oreocarya crassipes (Boraginaceae)

  • James I. CohenEmail author
Research Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The Chihuahuan Desert includes many endemic angiosperm species, some having very restricted geographic ranges. One of these species is Oreocarya crassipes (I. M. Johnst.) Hasenstab & M. G. Simpson, an endangered distylous gypsophile from the Trans-Pecos region in southern Brewster County, Texas, USA. The species is known from 10 populations, and this small number of populations, human development in the area, a distylous breeding system, and edaphic requirements threaten the long-term viability of the species. Using both hundreds of single nucleotide polymorphisms identified via tunable genotyping-by-sequencing (tGBS) and 10 microsatellite loci, patterns of genetic diversity, demography, selection, and migration were examined for 192 individuals from four populations of O. crassipes. From the sampled individuals, two populations (clusters) were identified via multiple methodologies and with both types of data. With SNP data, population substructure was further resolved among one of these populations to identify two distinct groups of individuals. Multiple individuals recognized as having mixed ancestry, along with Fst values and AMOVA results, provide evidence of genetic exchange among populations, which is less common for gypsophiles than non-gypsophiles, and the rate of migration among populations has been increasing recently. The Fst values for O. crassipes are more similar to those of other rare species than to other gypsophiles. Additionally, while distyly specifically does not necessarily impact the population genetics of the species, allogamy, which is facilitated by distyly, seems to have played a role in the genetic structure of O. crassipes.

Keywords

Boraginaceae Chihuahuan Desert Conservation genomics Distyly Genotyping-by-sequencing Gypsum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

D. Garcia, J.-M. Choi, M. Williams, and B. Warnock provided wonderful assistance with field work. J. Wells, B. Gardiner, and H. Mills and the O2 Ranch allowed access to property for sampling plants, and the project would not have been possible without their cooperation. C. Ritzi and students identified floral visitors. L. G. Ruane and four reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript. A. M. Powell and C. D. Kellogg supported and encouraged the successful completion of the project. Funding for the project came from four sources: primarily from a traditional Section 6 Grant from the Texas Parks and Wildlife (TX E-160-R), from Texas A&M International University and Kettering University, and from the National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation Program (Award Number 1725938) for the KUHPC.

Supplementary material

10592_2019_1212_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (11.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 11971 kb)

References

  1. Barrett SC (1992) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett S, Shore J (2008) New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett SC, Jesson LK, Baker AM (2000) The evolution and function of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants. Ann Bot 85:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beerli P (2009) How to use MIGRATE or why are Markov chain Monte Carlo programs difficult to use. Popul Genet Anim Conserv 17:42–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beerli P, Palczewski M (2010) Unified framework to evaluate panmixia and migration direction among multiple sampling locations. Genetics 185:313–326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bresowar GE, McGlaughlin ME (2014) Characterization of microsatellite markers isolated from members of Oreocarya (Boraginaceae). Conserv Genet Resour 6:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bresowar GE, McGlaughlin ME (2015) Morphological and genetic discrepancies in populations of Oreocarya paradoxa and O. revealii: the impact of edaphic selection on recent diversification in the Colorado Plateau. Am J Bot 102:1647–1658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Casper BB (1985) Self-compatibility in distylous Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae). New Phytol 99:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casper BB (1988) Post-dispersal seed predation may select for wind dispersal but not seed number per dispersal unit in Cryptantha flava. Oikos 52(1):27–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casper BB, Wiens D (1981) Fixed rates of random ovule abortion in Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae) and its possible relation to seed dispersal. Ecology 62:866–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caye K, Jay F, Michel O, Francois O (2017) Fast inference of individual admixture coefficients using geographic data. bioRxiv.  https://doi.org/10.1101/080291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coates BS, Sumerford DV, Miller NJ, Kim KS, Sappington TW, Siegfried BD, Lewis LC (2009) Comparative performance of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for population genetic analysis. J Hered 100:556–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen JI (2010) “A case to which no parallel exists”: the influence of Darwin’s different forms of flowers. Am J Bot 97:701–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen JI (2014) A phylogenetic analysis of morphological and molecular characters of Boraginaceae: evolutionary relationships, taxonomy, and patterns of character evolution. Cladistics 30:139–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen JI, Rodriguez H, Hutcheson H (In review) Distyly in Oreocarya crassipes (Boraginaceae), an endangered species. Southwest NatGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole CT (2003) Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:213–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674–3676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. De Meeûs T, Goudet J (2007) A step-by-step tutorial to use HierFstat to analyse populations hierarchically structured at multiple levels. Infect Genet Evol 7:731–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Earl DA (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elias SA, Van Devender TR (1990) Fossil insect evidence for late Quaternary climatic change in the Big Bend region, Chihuahuan Desert, Texas. Quat Res 34:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer MC, Rellstab C, Leuzinger M, Roumet M, Gugerli F, Shimizu KK, Holderegger R, Widmer A (2017) Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation–an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri. BMC Genom 18:69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foll M (2012) Bayescan v2. 1 user manual. Ecology 20:1450–1462Google Scholar
  26. Foll M, Gaggiotti O (2008) A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180:977–993CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Frichot E, François O (2015) LEA: an R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods Ecol Evol 6:925–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Funk WC, McKay JK, Hohenlohe PA, Allendorf FW (2012) Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends Ecol Evol 27:489–496CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ganders FR (1979) The biology of heterostyly. NZ J Bot 17:607–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gitzendanner MA, Soltis PS (2000) Patterns of genetic variation in rare and widespread plant congeners. Am J Bot 87:783–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Goudet J (2005) Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Resour 5:184–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herbert J (2006) Future climate change scenarios for Big Bend National Park, Texas. Southwest Geogr 10:36–51Google Scholar
  33. Hernandez HM, Barcenas RT (1995) Endangered cacti in the Chihuahuan Desert: I. Distribution patterns. Conserv Biol 9:1176–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Jeffries DL, Copp GH, Lawson Handley L, Olsén KH, Sayer CD, Hänfling B (2016) Comparing RADseq and microsatellites to infer complex phylogeographic patterns, an empirical perspective in the Crucian carp, Carassius carassius, L. Mol Ecol 25:2997–3018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST (2005) Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genet 6:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Kerley GI, Whitford WG (2000) Impact of grazing and desertification in the Chihuahuan Desert: plant communities, granivores and granivory. Am Midl Nat 144:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kopelman NM, Mayzel J, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA, Mayrose I (2015) Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Resour 15:1179–1191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee J-H, Kim WT (2011) Regulation of abiotic stress signal transduction by E3 ubiquitin ligases in Arabidopsis. Mol Cells 31:201–208CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu J-M, Zhao J-Y, Lu P-P, Chen M, Guo C-H, Xu Z-S, Ma Y-Z (2016) The E-subgroup pentatricopeptide repeat protein family in Arabidopsis thaliana and confirmation of the responsiveness PPR96 to abiotic stresses. Front Plant Sci 7:1825PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Maddox JC, Carlquist S (1985) Wind dispersal in Californian desert plants: experimental studies and conceptual considerations. Aliso 11:77–96Google Scholar
  44. Meeus S, Honnay O, Jacquemyn H (2012) Strong differences in genetic structure across disjunct, edge, and core populations of the distylous forest herb Pulmonaria officinalis (Boraginaceae). Am J Bot 99:1809–1818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH (2004) GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Resour 4:792–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meyer SE (1986) The ecology of gypsophile endemism in the eastern Mojave Desert. Ecology 67:1303–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meyer S, Garcia-Moya E (1986) Gypsum grasslands of northern San Luis Potosi, Mexico: patterns of vegetation, soil, and seasonal moisture availability. Occasional Papers of the Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute, AlpineGoogle Scholar
  48. Michaud G, Monger H, Anderson D (2013) Geomorphic-vegetation relationships using a geopedological classification system, northern Chihuahuan Desert, USA. J Arid Environ 90:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore MJ, Jansen RK (2007) Origins and biogeography of gypsophily in the Chihuahuan Desert plant group Tiquilia subg. Eddya (Boraginaceae). Systematic Botany 32:392–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moore MJ, Mota JF, Douglas NA, Olvera HF, Ochoterena H (2014) The ecology, assembly and evolution of gypsophile floras. In: Rajakaruna N, Boyd RS, Harris T (eds) Plant ecology and evolution in harsh environments. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 97–128Google Scholar
  51. Muldavin EH (2002) Some floristic characteristics of the northern Chihuahuan Desert: a search for its northern boundary. Taxon 51:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nybom H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol 13:1143–1155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Ott A, Liu S, Schnable JC, Yeh C-TE, Wang K-S, Schnable PS (2017) tGBS® genotyping-by-sequencing enables reliable genotyping of heterozygous loci. Nucleic Acids Res 45:e178–e178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Pavlik BM, Nickrent DL, Howald AM (1993) The recovery of an endangered plant. I. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conserv Biol 7:510–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Resour 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pina-Martins F, Silva DN, Fino J, Paulo OS (2017) Structure_threader: an improved method for automation and parallelization of programs structure, fastStructure and MavericK on multicore CPU systems. Mol Ecol Resour 17:e268–e274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet J (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Powell AM, Turner B (1977) Aspects of the plant biology of the gypsum outcrops of the Chihuahuan Desert. In: Transactions of a symposium on biological resources of the Chihuahuan desert US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Transactions Proceedings Series, pp 315–325Google Scholar
  59. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  61. Raj A, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2014) fastSTRUCTURE: variational inference of population structure in large SNP data sets. Genetics 197:573–589CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Ratnieks FL, Shackleton K (2015) Does the waggle dance help honey bees to forage at greater distances than expected for their body size? Front Ecol Evol 3:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raymond M (1995) GENEPOP: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. Vers. 1.2. J Hered 86:248–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Resour 4:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rothberg JM, Hinz W, Rearick TM, Schultz J, Mileski W, Davey M, Leamon JH, Johnson K, Milgrew MJ, Edwards M (2011) An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature 475:348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Service USFaW (1993) Draft Terlingua Creek Cat’s-eye (Cryptantha crassipes) Recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, AustinGoogle Scholar
  68. Shao J-W, Chen W-L, Peng Y-Q, Zhu G-P, Zhang X-P (2009) Genetic diversity within and among populations of the endangered and endemic species Primula merrilliana in China. Biochem Syst Ecol 37:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shibayama Y, Kadono Y (2007) Reproductive success and genetic structure of populations of the heterostylous aquatic plant Nymphoides indica (L.) Kuntze (Menyanthaceae). Aquat Bot 86:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ (1999) Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 14:401–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Rossum F, De Sousa SC, Triest L (2006) Morph-specific differences in reproductive success in the distylous Primula veris in a context of habitat fragmentation. Acta Oecol 30:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Verity R, Nichols RA (2016) Estimating the number of subpopulations (K) in structured populations. Genetics 115:180992Google Scholar
  73. Villarreal-Quintanilla JA, Bartolomé-Hernández JA, Estrada-Castillón E, Ramírez-Rodríguez H, Martínez-Amador SJ (2017) El elemento endémico de la flora vascular del Desierto Chihuahuense. Acta Bot Mex 18:65–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang L, Ware D (2014) CloudSTRUCTURE: infer population STRUCTURE on the cloud. arXiv preprint arXiv:14084081
  75. Warnock BJ (2012) Final report—population biology, habitat description and delineation and conservation of Terlingua Creek Cat’s-eye (Cryptantha crassipes). Texas Parks and Wildlife, Texas, p 29Google Scholar
  76. Williams MT, Warnock BJ, Betz JM, Beck JJ, Gardner DR, Lee ST, Molyneux RJ, Colegate SM (2011) Detection of high levels of pyrrolizidine-N-oxides in the endangered plant Cryptantha crassipes (Terlingua Creek Cat’s-eye) using HPLC-ESI-MS. Phytochem Anal 22:532–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wu TD, Nacu S (2010) Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads. Bioinformatics 26:873–881CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Yuan N, Sun Y, Comes HP, Fu CX, Qiu YX (2014) Understanding population structure and historical demography in a conservation context: population genetics of the endangered kirengeshoma palmata (hydrangeaceae). Am J Bot 101:521–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Zheng X, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS (2012) A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics 28:3326–3328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied BiologyKettering UniversityFlintUSA

Personalised recommendations