Conserving adaptive potential: lessons from Tasmanian devils and their transmissible cancer
- 765 Downloads
Maintenance of adaptive genetic variation has long been a goal of management of natural populations, but only recently have genomic tools allowed identification of specific loci associated with fitness-related traits in species of conservation concern. This raises the possibility of managing for genetic variation directly relevant to specific threats, such as those due to climate change or emerging infectious disease. Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) face the threat of a transmissible cancer, devil facial tumor disease (DFTD), that has decimated wild populations and led to intensive management efforts. Recent discoveries from genomic and modeling studies reveal how natural devil populations are responding to DFTD, and can inform management of both captive and wild devil populations. Notably, recent studies have documented genetic variation for disease-related traits and rapid evolution in response to DFTD, as well as potential mechanisms for disease resistance such as immune response and tumor regression in wild devils. Recent models predict dynamic persistence of devils with or without DFTD under a variety of modeling scenarios, although at much lower population densities than before DFTD emerged, contrary to previous predictions of extinction. As a result, current management that focuses on captive breeding and release for maintaining genome-wide genetic diversity or demographic supplementation of populations could have negative consequences. Translocations of captive devils into wild populations evolving with DFTD can cause outbreeding depression and/or increases in the force of infection and thereby the severity of the epidemic, and we argue that these risks outweigh any benefits of demographic supplementation in wild populations. We also argue that genetic variation at loci associated with DFTD should be monitored in both captive and wild populations, and that as our understanding of DFTD-related genetic variation improves, considering genetic management approaches to target this variation is warranted in developing conservation strategies for Tasmanian devils.
KeywordsCaptive breeding Conservation genomics Emerging infectious disease Supplementation Wildlife cancer
This work was supported by NSF Grant DEB-1316549 and NIH Grant R01-GM126563 as part of the joint NSF-NIH-USDA Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases program.
- Brüniche-Olsen A, Jones ME, Burridge CP, Murchison EP, Holland BR, Austin JJ (2018) Ancient DNA tracks the mainland extinction and island survival of the Tasmanian devil. J Biogeogr 2014:1–14Google Scholar
- CBSG/DPIPWE/ARAZPA (2009) The save the Tasmanian Devil Program: strategic framework for an insurance meta-population. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, HobartGoogle Scholar
- DPIPWE (2018) Wild devil recovery project. Tasmanian Government. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania. https://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/wildlife-management/save-the-tasmanian-devil-program/about-the-program/wild-devil-recovery-project. Accessed 6 Sept 2018
- Gilpin ME, Soulé ME (1986) Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. In: Soule ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 19–34Google Scholar
- Huxtable SJ, Lee DV, Wise P, Save the Devil Program (2015) Metapopulation management of an extreme disease scenario. In: Armstrong DP, Hayward MW, Moro D, Seddon PJ (eds) Advances in reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 141–154Google Scholar
- Luikart G, Kardos M, Hand BK, Rajora OP, Aitken SN, Hohenlohe PA (2018) Population genomics: advancing understanding of nature. In: Rajora OP (ed) Population genomics: concepts, approaches, and applications. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
- Margres MJ, Ruiz-Aravena M, Hamede RK et al (2018b) The genomic basis of tumor regression in Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii). Genom Biol Evol 10:3012–3025Google Scholar
- Pearse AM, Swift K, Hodson P, Hua B, McCallum H, Pyecroft S, Taylor R, Eldridge MD, Belov K (2012) Evolution in a transmissible cancer: a study of the chromosomal changes in devil facial tumor (DFT) as it spreads through the wild Tasmanian devil population. Cancer Genet 205:101–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siddle HV, Kreiss A, Tovar C, Yuen CK, Cheng Y, Belov K, Swift K, Pearse AM, Hamede R, Jones ME, Skjødt K (2013) Reversible epigenetic down-regulation of MHC molecules by devil facial tumour disease illustrates immune escape by a contagious cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:5103–5108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siska V, Eriksson A, Mehlig B, Manica A (2018) A metapopulation model of the spread of the Devil Facial Tumour Disease predicts the long term collapse of its host but not its extinction. arXiv:1806.05449Google Scholar
- Soulé ME, Wilcox B (1980) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar